Aneirin
Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006 From: Tamaris Status: offline
|
In 1859 it was predicted that photography would be able to visually document future wars correctly by generating precise documentation of battles, fortifications, landscapes, soldiers and military officers (from Mary Warner's; Photography, a cultural history). Louis Daguerre the creator of the first commercial photographic process and successful camera, the daguerrotype said that; images produced by the camera were an absolute truth and infinately more accurate than any painting by the human hand. Photography was assumed by the general public to be accurate and was taken as a mechanical impression of reality, i.e, the camera never lies. Oh but it does, it can do anything the photographer desires of it and yes, totally distort truth. The first instance of this was the work of Haley Sims and Alexander Gardner of the American civil war period for the tableau; Soldiers of the Battlefield and later; The Home of the sharpshooter, Battlefield images were taken after the battle and arranged such that the general public saw the horror of war away from the golden reports of the past, the first anti war imagery. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/cwphtml/cwpcam/cwcam1.html Zoom on a hundred years or so, reportage photography, made famous in the Vietnam period, anti war imagery at it's best, the works of Tim Page, combining gritty realism with artistry; http://timpageimage.com.au/index.php?node=image&page=display&directory=Nam/ The present day, photography is everywhere, everyone or near everyone has access to an image capturing device, or at least can get one and with the change in media to digital, the modern world is there anything that is not documented. And so the use of photography has become an important tool in the education of the general public, the belief that the camera never lies is used to political advantage, imagery is staged and manipulated to tell a story and this fact is used very much by those who have reason to manipulate the viewer in the direction they want them to go, digital imagery is the worst for this, as images can be altered by adding or subtracting pixels in editing programs, very easily and by anyone. Given this fact that modern photography is even easier to fake, who actually believes the camera never lies ? What about reportage photography, are we being manipulated by photography, to believe something is as is seen, not necessarily how it was taken, Is public oppinion being steered by clever and creative media specialists ? Or do you go by the old adage, believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see, if you do how do you discern truth in an increasingly false world ?
< Message edited by Aneirin -- 12/17/2008 6:53:36 AM >
_____________________________
Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
|