DavanKael
Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/6/2007 Status: offline
|
I think that the points discussed in the original post are entirely opinion-based and believe that what is right for you or something that you revere is your choice or orientation. I see nothing wrong with revering one thing more than another inherently; we all value certain things more than others, some to such a degree that they would fall within the realm of reverence: I know I certianly have my list. It would strike me as some bizarre form of political correctness or marginalization to say that all things are equal because we, as the filters, make that inherently not so. As for illusions, I think that we all have them, to one degree or another. Certainly, some serve us more positively than others but I believe it is human nature. Can we fight against our nature and attempt to divest ourselves of our illusions. Certainly, and if an individual choice is made to do so, I believe that is a valid selection. Taking the illusions of another is another thing entirely; unless there's some substantial reason for me to do so, I tend to leave people to their illusions; they tend to react (And behave poorly) when they are stripped away without their desire for such to be the case. I was out with some friends this evening who proclaimed me the 'anti-chick' and listed off a bunch of reasons why that is a really cool thing. To some others, those very same 'anti-chick' traits could be negatives. Obviously, those who find them to be positives and whose traits I value as positives are likely to be within my frame of reference and circle of contacts. I believe this all boils down to value and what value (or, when value is elevated to a substantial degree, reverence) we place on various traits. Davan
_____________________________
May you live as long as you wish & love as long as you live -Robert A Heinlein It's about the person & the bond,not the bondage -Me Waiting is 170NZ (Aka:Sex God Du Jour) pts Jesus,I've ALWAYS been a deviant -Leadership527,Jeff
|