Lorr47 -> RE: Is There Really a Credit Crunch? (12/25/2008 10:07:32 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
Are you claiming that scum sucking maggots sometimes tell the truth? How can you tell when the CEO is being honest or being a maggot? Even pathological liars tell the truth on occasion, so it would not surprise me that scum sucking maggots occasionally tell the truth (Democrats, lawyers, and politicians excepted). I am not a "democrat" per se or a politician. I have become an ultra liberal but given my beliefs the democratic party would not want to be associated with me. I believe when I characterized myself the other night I said: from the Corp to SDS to Libertarian to Anarchist. I consider violence an acceptable means to effectuate an end to human suffering. I consider Obama the best last chance to achieve those ends peacefully. Calling me a "politician?" Where is my glove and the dueling pistols. Are the bank CEOs being totally honest and forthcoming about their lending? I honestly do not know, and I am not certain I have reliable means to make that determination. You are being disingenuous: In numerous threads you call bankers dishonest, lying and scum sucking maggots and then when you need "authority" you cite bankers as an honest source of irrefutable fact? But therein lies the question. If CEOs are being honest, and some banks are lending to some people/businesses, why are other banks not able to lend to those same borrowers, and why are some borrowers no longer able to borrow? Is it truly a "credit crunch" if sub-prime borrowers are no longer allowed to borrow funds where there is a substantial risk of not being repaid? Is it a "credit crunch" or are credit standards merely returning to some baseline norm from which they should never have departed? I believe one of my first examples above was my daughter. Let's use my daughter's experience. Let's see. Is she a "sub prime" maggot who has preyed on your poor mortgage brokers and bankers? Well maybe not. Her net worth is over $1,000,000; she owns her own home worth $500,000 free and clear; she is purchasing another home of comparable worth nearby for her x husband so her daughter has a nice place for visitation; and she owns her business outright; including the building, free and clear. Oh yes, when American Express said that it wouldn't have the money to loan this year, she took the money out of a savings account. How does she fit into your category of a sub prime maggot borrower preying on your poor bankers and who is not a good risk? The difference between me and you is that I continuously hate bankers, wall street types and most conservatives (excepting Pat Buchanan and Greenspan). I seldom switch. (And yes my daughter contributed to Obama, worked at Obama's office up to the election and worked with Obama's office on election day on the street getting the vote out. She has great karma.) Or is the "credit crunch" an expression of the inevitable pain felt in the marketplace as credit availability contracts towards said baseline norm? Are we seeing too little credit, or the come-down from too much? The intellectual honesty of your question reminds me of another conservative on this site who called the CEOs of the Auto makers "Liberals." In any case, are you angling for a statement that this entire economic crises is merely a correction? By your definition is a depression merely a correction? I almost made it to mid night and then you went and did it again. I was more conservative than you less than a decade ago. Then I started working with the poor. As I started to hate the causes of the suffering; I started hating conservatives. You do not appreciate what is happening because you are not suffering yourself and you do not see those who are suffering. Name one way this depression impacts you. Hippiekinkster: " Average people who are one paycheck away from crashing are invisible to righties except when they want their vote or their money." Well put. Amen. CL, Merry Christmas.
|
|
|
|