References ?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

References ?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> References ?

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

References ? - 12/29/2008 9:54:19 AM

Aneirin

Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline

I notice that on here many when they reply to a thread, often quote links to material posted elsewhere on the web, obviously to illustrate their answer, but I have to ask about these references, because they are posted elsewhere by others, who is to say that what these linked posters actually post is correct, (going on the assumption that a lot of what is posted on the web is of dubious value ) ?

Why in fact do people feel the need to seek out and link to material elsewhere, is it that they feel they must be right, unchallengeable in their posting ?

Often I have seen posted, people ask to see a link to material before they will take anyone's point of view, and often if it is the poster's own experience, they are ignored or thought to be lying unless they can provide back up via a link, why?

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

Post #: 1

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 9:56:50 AM

JustDarkness

Posts: 1461
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

yes sadly.

People post links to help you mostly. It doesn't say "don't think...this is the truth". Best is always to have several sources and cross check them.

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 2

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 10:27:43 AM

DesFIP

Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline

Sometimes when the post includes writing that is more formal in speech, the assumption is that the person is in fact not writing what they think, but plagiarizing. This is frowned upon and will get responses demanding that links be given.

But not everyone is that good as a writer, or at organizing their thoughts so they will link to something that expresses their feelings. And they link because they don't want to plagiarize.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!

(in reply to JustDarkness)

Post #: 3

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 10:34:09 AM

SimplyIsaac

Posts: 376
Joined: 12/20/2008
Status: offline

Personally, I blame college.
We live in a world now where you can't have an opinion on anything unless you can quote your sources of information in a book or report somewhere.

The relevance of personal experience and opinion means nothing much these days...unless you put in your time at a socialist institution or wrote a book somewhere.

Edited to add: I know, I've been in college! Opinion=nothing. Correct answer=regurgitate data

< Message edited by SimplyIsaac -- 12/29/2008 10:58:55 AM >

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 4

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 10:48:29 AM

beargonewild

Posts: 22716
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

From what I have noticed is a few posters need a link or three as validation before believing the other person's word. My take is many have become so distrustful of people and forget how to give an anonymous person the benefit of the doubt until proven differently.

_____________________________

Do Not Rile da Chosen Bear

Promiscuous boy you already know
That I’m all yours what you waiting for?

Resident MANWHORE ~1000 Bear pts~

10 NZ points
Whips~n~Cuffs

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 5

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 10:52:44 AM

Aszhrae

Posts: 1030
Joined: 3/31/2008
Status: offline

quote:

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

It seems a standard practice these days to ask for pieces of paper, proof, background and letters of referral.
It is a learned trait in a world that believes less in honor and respect of self and others, where proof is required by external sources.
I have found those of a higher education, College or University, tend to provide links to substantiate their points of text. They have been conditioned to think in facts, trusting only reason and not their heart.
Back in '01, I ran away from the present couple and went to stay with a couple in Jacksonville, Fla. While I was there, I found employment very quickly. They could care less of my country of origin, citizenship or whether or not I had a piece of paper as proof. Their attitude was, 'You say you can do this. Show me.' Proof is in an individuals expertise.
These days, its all about your location and the mentality of your peers.
Over the years I have found that those individuals that place more trust in the dollar, tend to put less trust in the word of others.

I can build houses but I can not excavate the land to ready it for the footings. Do you trust my word or do you require references? Of course you would make such a request because it is your house that you asked me to build.
The problem with society is that it wants pieces of paper first before experience.
My father was in construction and my current master is also in construction. My experience is 27 years. Here it is not enough, they want a piece of paper, but when I was stateside on the run, I only had 20 years, but the employer accepted my word.

There are those that others have come before that have ruined it for the rest of us that are value our word. They have sowed the seeds of dishonesty and thus the individual mistrusts everyone, no matter how sincere their motivations might be.

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 6

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 10:54:11 AM

SimplyIsaac

Posts: 376
Joined: 12/20/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

From what I have noticed is a few posters need a link or three as validation before believing the other person's word. My take is many have become so distrustful of people and forget how to give an anonymous person the benefit of the doubt until proven differently.

Yep, that too. Then you have those people who have way too much time on their hands and just like going around and around and around in circles...even when you present the data...

(in reply to beargonewild)

Post #: 7

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 11:00:42 AM

CalifChick

Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline

Too many bullshit artists with too much reliance on Wikipedia.

Cali

_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to SimplyIsaac)

Post #: 8

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 11:06:54 AM

oceanwynds

Posts: 1044
Joined: 8/24/2006
Status: offline

I prefer personal experiences verses references, though if of interest to me i will click on the link. I just look at people with references as sharing information. It is one way though for me, to keep out all the crazy drama played out on these posts. I rather read a reference then this person is no good or that person is no good, and blah blah blah. Personal attacks on people, or groups of people, is something seen in these posts to frequestly.

oceanwynds

(in reply to CalifChick)

Post #: 9

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 12:55:01 PM

Raechard

Posts: 3513
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline

There is an internet fact to support every position, see link below:

www.wikipedia.org\growth-of-internet.html

no seriously...

http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm

_____________________________

えへまにんへえや
Nobody wants to listen to the same song over and over again!

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 10

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 2:07:19 PM

Vendaval

Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline

Much depends on the type of discussion and whether people are using debate tactics to further their argument. In some instances I go with the flow and just state a personal opinion or observation, in others I post references and sources.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE

http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 11

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 3:21:08 PM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

I notice that on here many when they reply to a thread, often quote links to material posted elsewhere on the web, obviously to illustrate their answer, but I have to ask about these references, because they are posted elsewhere by others, who is to say that what these linked posters actually post is correct, (going on the assumption that a lot of what is posted on the web is of dubious value ) ?

Why in fact do people feel the need to seek out and link to material elsewhere, is it that they feel they must be right, unchallengeable in their posting ?

Often I have seen posted, people ask to see a link to material before they will take anyone's point of view, and often if it is the poster's own experience, they are ignored or thought to be lying unless they can provide back up via a link, why?

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

So if I tell you that grass is really blue and not green you'll take my word that you are colorblind without asking me for any proof?

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 12

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 3:30:46 PM

Lynnxz

Posts: 4813
Joined: 10/3/2006
From: Atlanta
Status: offline

Every once in a while I will use a reference in an argument, but it's usually something that I've seen before, not the first thing that pops up in google. I've got about five inches of research devoted towards studies done on prostitution on the desk actually, and I'm pretty sure I've used a couple of them in an argument here. They are reliable sources though, a concept a few people here don't understand.

Wikipedia, blogs, and the rantings of crazed conspiracy theorists with nothing to back them up are 'not' resources.

_____________________________

HBIC

(in reply to rulemylife)

Post #: 13

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 3:55:55 PM

MzMia

Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline

Well, I often use "references", but! I try to only use references with
a certain amount of credibility!

I never use Wikipedia, yahoo, etc.
I really try to only use first rate credible sources. {Usually MAJOR newspapers like
the Washington Post or Crooks and liars}.
Well, Crooks and Liars is a credible source of information? right?

I try to explain myself and make my point, hopefully you will
understand what the
point is..........{without having to "check" the references}.
My references are almost always used for "clarity" or another source for information.

I have also recently tried to start more posts, with NO references!

Hopefully, you can understand whatever it is I am posting about, regardless of whether you read a link/reference or not!

< Message edited by MzMia -- 12/29/2008 4:13:57 PM >

_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain

What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to Lynnxz)

Post #: 14

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:05:22 PM

thishereboi

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

I need more info....maybe if you could give me a couple links...

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 15

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:18:07 PM

Hippiekinkster

Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

I notice that on here many when they reply to a thread, often quote links to material posted elsewhere on the web, obviously to illustrate their answer, but I have to ask about these references, because they are posted elsewhere by others, who is to say that what these linked posters actually post is correct, (going on the assumption that a lot of what is posted on the web is of dubious value ) ?

Why in fact do people feel the need to seek out and link to material elsewhere, is it that they feel they must be right, unchallengeable in their posting ?

Often I have seen posted, people ask to see a link to material before they will take anyone's point of view, and often if it is the poster's own experience, they are ignored or thought to be lying unless they can provide back up via a link, why?

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

It's not a matter of being right; it's a matter of being factual.
It's not that I think anyone is lying; it's that an assertion is nothing more than an opinion.
http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalarguments/a/importance.htm

An excellent compendium of logical fallacies. An interesting exercise is to see how many different ones you can identify in the "political" threads.
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 16

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:39:53 PM

Aneirin

Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline

What is wrong with oppinions though, surely when someone asks a question, they are seeking the oppinions of others, not oppinions in general, on the world wide web. If someone sought the oppinion of the world wide web, they would search the web, not ask questions here.

I post here, to stimulate conversation, I ask questions here, because from experience, I have found people here, those that engage on the forums, largely they appear to be of a more flexible and higher level of understanding than other forums I regularly visit. So here, I spend the majority of my web time, rather than other places, and this is the only forum where I have stayed in my four years of internet access. Other forums I have joined, well, most have faded away, here, I like it here, and like most of you people, most of the time.

_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)

Post #: 17

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:52:05 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

People are sometimes mistaken when recalling a fact. If you use good references, then your comment is supported. Now the question is, are they verifiable sources? This is one of the problems as a wiki editor. Come across some article that someone has modified or created, and it is linked to a bunch of member.aol or geocties web pages as a verifiable resource.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

I notice that on here many when they reply to a thread, often quote links to material posted elsewhere on the web, obviously to illustrate their answer, but I have to ask about these references, because they are posted elsewhere by others, who is to say that what these linked posters actually post is correct, (going on the assumption that a lot of what is posted on the web is of dubious value ) ?

Why in fact do people feel the need to seek out and link to material elsewhere, is it that they feel they must be right, unchallengeable in their posting ?

Often I have seen posted, people ask to see a link to material before they will take anyone's point of view, and often if it is the poster's own experience, they are ignored or thought to be lying unless they can provide back up via a link, why?

Have we evolved so far that we no longer take a person at their word anymore ?

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Aneirin)

Post #: 18

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:53:43 PM

MzMia

Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline

I agree with Orion!!
There is a big difference between a source such as "The Washington Post",
and sites like Joe'sBullshitblog.com.

< Message edited by MzMia -- 12/29/2008 6:54:13 PM >

_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain

What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 19

RE: References ? - 12/29/2008 6:58:14 PM

Aneirin

Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline

Could it be if we all used offsite references to explain our thoughts, we could in fact lose the ability to explain ourselves ?

Could it be also that there is a hint of laziness in gathering words from other people's minds to speak on behalf of us ?

I hate to see the day when it may come that from post to post within a thread, it is just a mass of links to other places, other people, and other people's thoughts, not the person posting that link.

_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 20

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> References ?

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.111