LadyTeazer
Posts: 225
Joined: 4/1/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: darchChylde Look at it this way: why is it a Mistress and not a Master, with the negative connotations associated with the term mistress (example: the other woman or a kept woman)? Yup. Exactly what he said. *nods head vigorously* That is the reason that I do not like to be referred to as "Mistress". I know that I am one definition of the word (a dominant woman), and not the other (the 'other' woman), but still, it has a very negative association to me. As for why there is no gender specific 'title' for a female sub versus a male one, I dunno. Being a hetero Domme, I never thought about it, really. Just a quick thought.... Could it be because a sub is seen as 'inferior' to a dominant, and therefore does not deserve a gender-specific reference? I most certainly do **not** believe that nonsense for a moment. Personally, I see a sub as My equal, but opposite. Two halves that form a whole. I cannot be dominant if I have no one to submit to me, he cannot be submissive if he has no one to dominate him. I know that many Dom/me's feel that a sub is inferior to them. And that's great. It just doesn't work for me. I mean, if I felt that a sub was inferior to me, why on earth would I want to have anything to do with him? I deserve the best, not second rate. Lady Teazer -- proud and happy Owner of [saberwolf34] and still a WOW - Wonderful Older Woman
|