CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
For me, when I'm working with people providing pastoral care, I consider their sexuality to be according to their -preferences-... for example, if a person finds both men and women sexually attractive, regardless of whether xhe acts on that or not, then xhe is bi-sexual. Xhe doesn't even have to have an equivalent level of preference for one or the other. My own female companion generally prefers males, and is most sexually attracted to males, but she has the -occasional- interest in females... maybe 3 or 4 in her entire life, but it's still there, so she's still bi. I, on the other hand, couldn't care less about what gender a person is. I'm about equally attracted (or repelled) by males and females. I'm also bi, but I'm not bi in the same sense as my companion is. I am also celibate for long periods of time, and sex has a very minimal role in my life... but whether I'm having sex with someone doesn't change the nature of my bisexuality. In the same way, if a person has a sexual encounter with a person of the same gender, but is completely repelled by the experience, and has no interest in people of that gender, then that person is het. For a person or persons in authority to that individual to insist on further compelling that person to experience more same-sex encounters when xhe is clearly not attracted and is repelled by the experience, is, at least to me, tantamount to raping that person.
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|