Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
Orion, Why don`t you answer your own question. What amount of time do you think is fair? Does one get blamed for the water rushing through the breach, just weeks after taking over from the breach maker? In general,most presidents get a year or more,if there`s shit going on.If things are improving(like under Clinton),this subject isn`t even on the radar. bush got a decent economy and left it a wreck,started a war,got 4000 plus GIs killed and stranded our army in Iraq and flubbed Afghanistan. He got a pass for 9/11,got a pass for mis-leading us into a war,pretty much no media critism,...untill Katrina. That was the watershed moment. When Scott McClellan spilled the beans,it was over for bush`s credibility. I`m I wrong or do I see people insisting that we treat Obama as if he`s also a liar,just to be fair? Is it suggested that Obama also be taken to have no credibility (as bush doesn`t),just to be or seem even handed? That`s not how it works. Even with healthy skepticism,don`t we all give every person a clean slate and believe them,at least until they demonstrate dis-honesty? This is about bush and neo-conservatives and transcends left/right politics. Good question.But the answer is as easy to predict as public opinion is.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 2/9/2009 7:21:01 PM >
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|