RE: Realism in promises (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


StrangerThan -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 7:00:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

I see, over and over, relationships that are changing and shifting. I see people entering relationships, and leaving relationships, and I see so many people who come out of these changes feeling hurt, angry, lost, and burned. Many times, it seems to me that this comes out of promises made between Keeper and servant, like "I will love you -forever-", or "I will -always- take care of you", or "Unto death does us part", or "You are the only slave/Master/whatever for me", or "I will never leave you", or "I'll never love -anyone- but you". It seems to me, as we approach Valentine's Day, that perhaps many of the aches and pains of our BDSM relationships, and, in particular, our romantic BDSM relationships come out of this idea that we have the capacity to promise something that is an intangible, and is completely outside of our control.

I am curious to hear from people who make or have made these kinds of promises -- who promise "forever", and "always", and intimate that they will never change, and that the person they are with will never change, in their feelings towards one another. I am interested in the self-talk that people do when they are considering making such 'lifelong' promises, for which there can be no guarantee, when a promise intimates just such a guarantee -- something one should be able to count on. So... if you've made promises about loving forever, being faithful forever, or taking care of/keeping someone forever, what thought process goes through your mind, and how do you consider the dichotomy that human beings change, and that relationships mutate, people change and grow apart, and that we cannot always control who we end up becoming attracted to. I am also interested in how those who have succeeded thus far, and those whose relationships, made under such promises, have ended, feel about such promises going forward.


Aside from the phrasing, BDSM doesn't really belong in this thread. Well, I guess it could, but there's nothing sacred about broken BDMS relationships nor anything that specifically belongs to the world of kink in the overall question of should we promise or shouldn't we, and what real value does that promise have if we make it. Somewhat ironic that it comes with Valentine's Day in mind too since the premise of questioning the value of a promise is what one could use to advocate the death of that romantic forever.

My answer is going to be somewhat different.. I think.

When I found out Santa didn't exist, I didn't give up on the concept and value of giving from the heart nor of making that time special for others.

When I discovered daydreams only came true if you worked at making them come true, I didn't want to stop daydreaming. And when I discovered that some literal dreams would never come true, that I'd never be able to fly like Superman or swim like a merman, I didn't want to stop dreaming.

When I discovered that reality wasn't always as good as the fantasy that drove it, I didn't stop fantasizing.

When I discovered that sometimes folks lie, it didn't relieve the need in me to believe that truth is the stronger part of most people.

When I saw how so many people had been killed, enslaved or mistreated in the name of religion, it didn't make want to stop believing in God.

When I learned I could live alone and do so in a fulfilling and happy way, it didn't make me always want to be alone.

What those things did, was give me perspective. I married at a very young age because my girlfriend was pregnant. We both knew the marriage wasn't going to last, and in fact, discussed prior to it, how long we'd need to stay together. We did it because of parental pressures on her side, because of the fact that we both felt a responsibilty to the baby. We didn't decide on a number of years, we decided on goals, to put each other through college, to give the baby the best household we could during that time. It took 12 years. So I uttered those vows knowing I would break them. I don't regret a minute of it and it didn't make me want to give up on the idea of love lasting.

Yes, people change. Needs change. Life itself changes. But the two things that I've always believed drove a large part of human development was hope and imagination. If I can't hope for a love that lasts, or imagine one that does, it seems like something inside is broken. If I can only exist in one as long as it meets my every need, doesn't tempt me or try me then all I am really offering anyone is a transition. As many have so well noted here, traditional vows make us promise things we often have little control over. I don't think I would ever utter those again. At the same time, being a transition also means you're always in transition. Is that all you really want to be? A transition and in transition?

There are things I will say. I will say that I will take time every day to do the things I need to do to show you I love you. I will always listen. I will do whatever it takes to give you a place where happiness can exist. I will promise to never cheat on you. And yes, I will say I will love you forever. I can't promise to be with you forever. But I can promise that if I do the things above, if I give that place where happiness can be, where there is no need for secrecy or living double lives or hiding needs or desires, then forever is in my mind, until death. That is the hope. That is the grand design in the imagination.

I'm damned well not giving up on either one of them. Regardless of how long I live, whether it be tomorrow or 50 years from now, I want hope and imagination to leave when I leave and not before.

And I'm lucky. I found a good girl to vent that hope and imagination upon.  







CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 10:02:25 AM)

quote:

At the same time, being a transition also means you're always in transition. Is that all you really want to be? A transition and in transition?


See, I've learned a lot from the prospectives offered on this thread... whether applied to BDSM commitments or to other communions with which one becomes involved. I've determined, after all is said and done, that this just about encompasses my preference. I think I am comfortable and happy being a 'transition', -in- transition. Perhaps I am part gypsy -- I suspect on my mother's side, since her roots were, by far, as ephemeral and transitory as any one could wish for (if one wished for such things).

This conversation has really also clarified a few things for me on the BDSM front, in that I'm taking myself out of the 'searching for someone for the House' equation. My Darling is still looking, of course, but I think I'm liking the idea of embracing my inner gypsy... my inner 'transition'.

Thanks, everyone, for a thoughtful discussion.




Jeptha -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 10:32:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

...There are things I will say. I will say that I will take time every day to do the things I need to do to show you I love you. I will always listen. I will do whatever it takes to give you a place where happiness can exist. I will promise to never cheat on you. And yes, I will say I will love you forever. I can't promise to be with you forever. ...
I didn't see that last part (that I bolded) coming.

Yes, I totally agree. I can love, as one loves friend and family, forever. I believe in that kind of love.

The other part of the traditional vow, "to honor and to cherish" is the part that hasn't been emphasized as much as the rote "til death do us part" part.
It's interesting that you made that distinction.

As for me, if a partner did not wish to be with me, they would honor me with the truth, not with their martyrdom at honoring their version of their promise.

When the time comes, do me the honor of cutting my head off with a fucking sword.
Don't drag it out.
(note: this is a metaphor for making a clean break; not a reference to a literal sword.)
To *NOT* do that would be to dishonor and deceive me.

I want you with me because that is your desire; not because you are enslaved to your own ego and self image.




IrishMist -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 11:56:00 AM)

I have made only one promise in my life and that was to always love my family. It's the only promise I know I would never and could never break. Not even death could break that promise.

Other than that, I don't make promises to anyone. Even my family knows better than to ask for a promise or to make a promise. Promises are made to be broken. Life itself guarantees that.

I would rather a person tell me that they will do everything within their power to see that they stick to their word. To me, that holds more weight than someone trying to promise me something.




DavanKael -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 6:17:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

I think, for me, the question that this all boils down to is: Would you consider your relationship to be as strong/valid if there were NO contract, NO promise, NO piece of paper registered with the government, and NO promises, vague or ritualized, theoretically enforceable or not... made in front of witnesses or alone... and if you knew there never would be... BUT you also knew that the person you was completely committed, for the forseeable present, to the communion you have?


No, I wouldn't. 
  Davan




came4U -> RE: Realism in promises (2/15/2009 7:20:06 PM)

I discussed this a few months ago with a longtime friend/dominant.  It was hard for me to explain and not sure he got it in it's entirety.

I don't want any promises, ever.  I don't want to hear 'you will be my only sub', 'I will be faithful' etc, nor will I never ask someone to utter those words.

They either will be faithfully static in a relationship or they won't.  The also will know that if any shifty behaviour is noticed they risk a buh-bye immediately, no questions asked.  I am not a young wide-eyed fool who would accept these words truth or not and think it will make me feel some sort of artificial security.  The security I need is untold, unworded and all grown up in it's maturity.

I will also never utter those words to anyone either.  They either accept me as a faithful person or they don't.  If he wants 'ridiculous' promises like we are in highschool then he is barking up the wrong tree.

If it doesn't work out because of unfaithfulness or of the sort who cares?  They chose to take that risk, they can do so, just be man enough to know that if I find the 'affair' hurtful I am gone. Nexxxxxxxxxxxxxt. I don't get jealous, but I sure will not tolerate being lied to.  A friend lying is bad enough, but a lover lying is just intolerable (not to mention dangerous). 

People that insist on hearing all of these poetic words before and during a relationship always hit rock bottom when the words fail to live up to promises.  I won't hit rock bottom because I will not give a man the option of (someday) being proven a liar.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125