MichMasochist -> RE: wondering about symbols, ways to indentify oneself discreetly, but more public (3/1/2006 2:14:00 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: valeca quote:
ORIGINAL: MichMasochist Left arm = submissive or bottom. (masochist) >Thick band = interest in male dom or top. >Thin band = interest in female domme or top. >Both thick and thin bands = interest both genders. Right arm = Dominate or top. (Sadist) >Thick band = interest in male submissive or bottom. >Thin band = interest in female submisive or bottom. >Both thick and thin bands = interest in both genders. Both arms >thin bands -->interest in female domme or top or interest in female submisive or bottom. ----->If worn by a female, she would be telling everyone that she is a lesbian switch. ----->If worn by a male, he would be telling everyone that he is a heteroexual switch. >thick bands -->interest in male dom or top or interest in male submissive or bottom. ----->If worn by a female, she would be telling everyone that she is a heterosexual switch. ----->If worn by a male, he would be telling everyone that he is a homosexual switch. >Both thick and thin bands -->interest in both genders. -----> This person wearing the bands being a switch and bi sexual As example a woman wearing a thick band on her right arm and a thin band on her left arm would be signifying that: >She is a dominate, or top, (sadist) towards or for a male bottom or submissive, (masochist). While being a bottom or submissive, (masochist) toward or for a female top or domme. and may or may not be bi-sexually orientated. Let's face it the permutations to the equations are virtually unlimited. So let us not create a multi-dimentional array that is too complicated, or confusing. Let's leave it generalized, that a couple seeking out companionship can save time by seeing who is interested in what. Then to introduce themselves. From there on if the interested parties choose to discuse personal details, that are obviously of an intimate nature, they may follow threw with some comfort of know what the other party is open minded, towards. Taking the idea to leather bands with stainless steel studs for S&M. Stainless steel snaps for B&D. Plain leather for D&S. Starts to and complexity like the leathermen colored hanky code. Your a a munch looking for that some one special. You see her a few feet away. Hmmm, Thick band on the right arm. My thin band on the left arm. Lets walk over and introduce myself and get to know her. Then, if we click, find out just what area of BDSM she is interested in. These are all well thought out, but they're all geared toward people actively seeking their other half/complimentary partner. I may have missed it, but what about the people who aren't looking--those who are already in a relationship but would want to display their place in the 'commmunity'? Would that fall under the 'interest in' bands? quote:
Left arm = submissive or bottom. (masochist) >Thick band = interest in male dom or top. >Thin band = interest in female domme or top. >Both thick and thin bands = interest both genders. I ask because, for myself, that would send the wrong signal. Let's say a Dominant see's me wearing a thick band on my left arm. He see's that I have 'interest in male Dom's' and strikes up a convo checking for chemistry/interest/etc. I'm happily married to my Master and not seeking anything, but there was nothing to indicate that I was already taken--unless, of course, I was wearing my collar, in which case, there's no real need for an armband. But the whole idea was to have something discrete to wear in public--something other than a collar...lol. Well that confused even me... At first, I was enthralled with the idea of another symbol, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized I don't really need to advertise what, or who, I am. The only one who really needs to know my 'place' in the community is Master...and He doesn't need a symbol for that. I think I'm going to stick with the tried and true method--if I want to know whether someone is Dominant or submissive, I'll introduce myself and strike up a conversation. If I don't know you well enough to ask such a question, I don't need to know that sort of personal information about you until you're ready to offer it yourself. That said, I understand that others may want to let people know that sort of thing in advance, and I'd back their right to do so. Maybe I'll want to display it myself, one day, too. You make a good point. But then again others might not be so fortunate as you. For me however I would think, if you're collared you probably shoudn't be advertising. That would be my mistress' place to introduce me as her property. In any event it would serve as an ice breaker, means of finding someone, or as a conversation piece.
|
|
|
|