Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: History already vindicating Bush


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: History already vindicating Bush Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 8:12:17 AM   
Coldwarrior57


Posts: 297
Joined: 12/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What the hell is JFK doing at #6? Seriously! What in the world did JFK do that makes him the 6th best president in American history?
Camelot!
He was a good looking horn dog that got shot. thats what he did .


_____________________________

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 9:07:12 AM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Bill Clinton's ranking was helped by his good marks for "Crisis Management" ranking 15th versus W's rank of 25.  All Bush had to contend with was a recession, 9/11, and a democrat Congress that bordered on being traitors undermining the moral of our troops on the battlefield with furious attacks on the mission and that "all was lost", that we were involved in a "civil war"..and on and on...BS.



Imagine those traitorous bastards, criticizing "the mission" after it was proven that all the justifications given by the administration for "the mission" were false.



Yeah, and how unlucky for Bush that he "had to contend with" things that he was largely responsible for causing.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 9:08:23 AM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Now Obama has to deal with a worse recession,9/11(still un-resolved),Iraq(a bunch of un-necessary bushit),frozen credit markets,nationalized banks,the highest debt inherited by a pres.,etc.,etc.,etc.

There wasn`t one thing bush was involved with that he didn`t fuck up.Not one.

From dirtier air,to weaker protective systems,to Iraq and other foriegn policy failures,to the financial crisis......

~~~~~~~~~~

I`m curious.

If history is going to vindicate bush,what is it that`ll happen,what event(s) or conditions will there be for bush to be viewed as something other than a what he`s viewed as now,a failure?






Bingo!

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 10:11:27 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Bill Clinton's ranking was helped by his good marks for "Crisis Management" ranking 15th versus W's rank of 25.  All Bush had to contend with was a recession, 9/11, and a democrat Congress that bordered on being traitors undermining the moral of our troops on the battlefield with furious attacks on the mission and that "all was lost", that we were involved in a "civil war"..and on and on...BS.


Cory, there used to be a time when - even though I seldom agreed with you - your posts often had something about them that made them worth reading, some point of view that added to the discussion. That seems like an awfully long time ago.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 10:21:53 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mozartsfuneral

I think it's because people thought JFK was handsome...and because he died.


That's pretty much it, isn't it? That and the fact that he gave some of the best, most inspiring speeches of any president in American history.

Not a bad president, but really a rather unremarkable record in his short time in office. This is why I don't take this poll seriously. Any poll that has him ranked 6th is meaningless.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to mozartsfuneral)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 12:07:48 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What the hell is JFK doing at #6? Seriously! What in the world did JFK do that makes him the 6th best president in American history?


In no particular order:

-Cuban Missile Crisis

-created the Peace Corps

-Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

-the New Frontier programs

-proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed after his assassination

-used federal power to block states from stopping desegregation at the University of Mississippi and the University of
Alabama

-launched the Apollo Project promising to land a man on the moon within ten years,  which was accomplished within
that time frame

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 12:19:09 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Bill Clinton's ranking was helped by his good marks for "Crisis Management" ranking 15th versus W's rank of 25.  All Bush had to contend with was a recession, 9/11, and a democrat Congress that bordered on being traitors undermining the moral of our troops on the battlefield with furious attacks on the mission and that "all was lost", that we were involved in a "civil war"..and on and on...BS.



Imagine those traitorous bastards, criticizing "the mission" after it was proven that all the justifications given by the administration for "the mission" were false.



By "wrong" I'm sure you don't mean the "justifications" at the time of the launch of "shock and awe"..but after we defeated the fourth largest army in the world in a few weeks and did not find WMD's?  Gosh, if only all our leaders had the 20/20 hindsight of Barack Obama, Murtha, Reid, and the ever popular Ms Pelosi. 
Intel agencies around the world thought Sadaam was working on again developing the nuclear capacity that was dismantled after the first Gulf War.  I think even Sadaam thought he had them too!  Hillary Clinton voted yes..not because she loved the idea presented by Bush, but because Sadaam was a threat through hubbies administrations, and it was Bill Clinton who developed the concept of "regime change" in Iraq. 

So please...spare me the same ol same old.. "Bush lied'..."Cheney twisted the intel"...the "exposed poor Valerie"...a desk jockey at the CIA who occupation I am sure she made sure that everyone on the Georgetown cocktail circuit knew just how important she was at the agency.  Do you think Pakistan would have made a deal with the Taliban for Christs sake if Cheney was there...ewwwww they are sooo scared of our young President, and Amtrak Joe Biden.  Cheney would be on a plane to Pakistan in a few hours settling this issue.."pick one from column A..one from column B"...that would be their choice.

Say what you will..live in the past...solve the issues of five years ago..and neglect the present.  In a few weeks in office, this adminsitration has so screwed up already that the stock market is reacting to a joke of a Stimulus package with a plunge again today...gold is soaring...and our President is doing another "photo op" as he signs a bill four days after it was passed....but there was no time to allow Congress to read.  We are getting "Change"...to a world run by a community activist.  You do know that ACORN and similar groups got $4 billion in this "stimulus" BS...while $2 billion for veteran hospitals was eliminated.  So where is the democrat priority..Getting friggin votes...!!!   Sleep well my child...Barney Frank, Pelosi and Reid are watching your back....jeeez

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 12:36:56 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What the hell is JFK doing at #6? Seriously! What in the world did JFK do that makes him the 6th best president in American history?


In no particular order:

-Cuban Missile Crisis

-created the Peace Corps

-Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

-the New Frontier programs

-proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed after his assassination

-used federal power to block states from stopping desegregation at the University of Mississippi and the University of
Alabama

-launched the Apollo Project promising to land a man on the moon within ten years,  which was accomplished within
that time frame



Oh, sure. No question he did some very good things. But is that list really sufficient to elevate him to #6 on the list of all American presidents? Especially in light of a couple accomplishments that you left out, like the Bay of Pigs fiasco, the coup d'etat and ultimate assassination of South Viet Namese president Diem, and the subsequent American military escalaltion in Viet Nam? Have the rest of our presidents really been that mediocre?


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:10:07 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

You must be projecting here, because I haven't said that


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

That's an interesting comparison, coming from someone who has judged the new presidency a failure after three weeks.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:21:46 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Another point to consider is how much of the information from recent administrations remains classified years later.


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
If I were doing such a list, I don't think I'd include anyone within the past 50 years. Dust is still settling on those administrations, so the view is murky.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:31:39 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
Good point!

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:42:47 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Think of all the death bed confessions or personal diaries that will be revealed as people who were in top govern. positions pass away!  Now that would make for some great novel and movie materials.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:44:03 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Six years of warfare, a trillion or so in expenses and the Taliban are still in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda is stronger than ever, Osama is still alive.  Our allies in the ME?  The same ones who staffed and funded 9/11.

We defeated the Nazis AND the Japanese from a standing start in five years after they had conquered most of Europe and Asia. 

Leadership my ass!!!!!!!

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 3:46:44 PM   
E2Sweet


Posts: 649
Joined: 7/8/2008
From: TopLeftCornerOf, OH, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What the hell is JFK doing at #6? Seriously! What in the world did JFK do that makes him the 6th best president in American history?


It has been a while since I've had a history class, but didn't he back the USSR down ending the Cuban Missile Crisis, and in that, prevent a global thermonuclear war?

Edited to add: Oops! I see this has already been addressed. My bad.


< Message edited by E2Sweet -- 2/17/2009 3:48:23 PM >


_____________________________

E2Sweet
"If it doesn't make you smile then chances are you're not doing it right."

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 4:18:23 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Wow, those other 6 guys must have sucked a lot worse than I thought possible!

I was wondering the same thing but as we all know by now...few can even recall the name Millard Filmore.

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 5:50:56 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

Bill Clinton's ranking was helped by his good marks for "Crisis Management" ranking 15th versus W's rank of 25.  All Bush had to contend with was a recession, 9/11, and a democrat Congress that bordered on being traitors undermining the moral of our troops on the battlefield with furious attacks on the mission and that "all was lost", that we were involved in a "civil war"..and on and on...BS.

All that pales in comparison to Billy and his "crisis" being married to Hillary and "staff"  meetings with a kid intern in the oval office.  I guess the only difference between Obama and Clinton in the Oval Office is that Barack took off his jacket and Bill took off his pants!  We have come a long way baby!!

Talk about BS...on both your points, I need to roll up my pants.

Well we have quite enough now, I mean wasn't it Reagan that gave the nukes to N. K and wasn't it Bush I who DIDN'T go all the way in Iraq. but ALL of that aside 2 things in particular.

I TAKE SERIOUS EXCEPTION in the use of the term TRAITORS in any case here.

That is of the most egregious cheap shots there is here. To be loyal opposition is NOT to be a traitor and in fact stretching our military to its limits on an unnecessary war 10,000 miles away from any threat to us...is more traitorous if you wish to go there.

Another point...PLEASE tell me what Reagan did MORE then Carter in 'winning' the cold war ? Time to stop worshiping and kissing the ass of any memory of Ronald Reagan. He too was celebrity without a message just like Obama is suposed to have been as candidate and was less as a professional in anything meaningful, being nothing more than a grad b movie actor.

What I will interject is that CARTER got PERSHING II MISSILES actually installed on the ground in western Europe and while the presidency was still a gleam in Reagan's eye. Reagan did nothing even close and giving a few speeches, telling Gorby no at Iceland which has been groupie-like morphed into some sort of romanticism. Throwing money at the navy and restoring a couple of battleships hardly counts for anything.

I grow weary and my intelligence more insulted everyday I read of such prefunctory little shippets of meaningless politcal pablum as a means to vent your partisan hate...enough.

Carter was much more the man than most opposition politicos and such that continue to insult the man to this day. He was a sucessful  businessman peanut farmer and career navy retiring as a nuke sub commander. The only repub coming close before or since was Eisenhower and because of his winning in Europe in WWII.

(Bush I was a 19 yr. old fighter pilot in WWII)

Reagan did almost nothing but double our debt, get 241 Marines killed in their sleep with his gunboat diplomacy which was anything but and adding 200,000 to the federal payroll.


< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 2/17/2009 6:02:12 PM >

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 7:38:33 PM   
MarsBonfire


Posts: 1034
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
The thing is, the dam is about to break. Already, "loyal" bushies are coming out of the closet and disclosing their experiences under "W" (stands for worst. president. ever.) That clacking sound you hear are the keyboards of hundreds of White House, military, and associates writing their tell-alls for the publishing industry. Who knows how many skeletons, how many outrages, how many criminal, treasonous acts will come to light in the coming days?

And this doesn't even take into account if there are trials for war crimes including Bush, Cheany, Rove, Rummy, and the rest...

Bush's office chair hasn't even had time for the frabreeze to get all the shit stink out of it... you ain't seen nothin' yet...

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/17/2009 8:33:18 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I do so love how The late 70's economy is laid at the feet of the man who took office in 1977 and not the party that held office for the preceeding 8 years when the problems actually started.

Who instituted the wage and price freeze in 1971? Who bungled the early days of the fiat currency economy? When was the OPEC embargo?
And who decided to continue that idiotuc SNAFU fiasco of a land war in Asia, for another 6 years?

"I am not a crook" Nixon. 

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/18/2009 12:46:41 PM   
Crush


Posts: 1031
Status: offline
I lost several friends over there, HK.  And some who came back, well, they didn't come back whole, physically or mentally.  And absolutely no support for them other than their close friends, unlike today, fortunately a bit better.  Those still the same damaged psyches and physical damage.

I lucked out, no denying that!  Was my year the last year of the ping pong balls for the draft that wasn't called up.  And my birthday was in the top 10, I think.  I didn't get rid of my draft card until I was 40...don't know why! 

Politicians aren't generals...nor do they read Sun Tzu.  Otherwise, they'd have fought the war and won or gotten the hell out earlier, instead of what they did..screw up micromanaging.    I know..."welcome to Iraq."




_____________________________

"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination." -- Mark Twain

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: History already vindicating Bush - 2/18/2009 5:03:12 PM   
MarsBonfire


Posts: 1034
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
Crush, they didn't even need to go as far as reading oriental philosophies about war to realize just how stuck they, as Bre'r Rabbit, were about to become to this particular tar baby. Hell, read Robert Heinlien's essay on "How to be a Survivor." He, speaking as a retired military man back in the late 50's new that when you become an occupying force, you leave yourself open to damage via fifth column attacks.

Armchair warriors like the GOP echo chambers here all seem to be willing to "fight to the last 18 year old" (now that they are all safely beyond any possible draft age) but I like to think that most responsible Americans, IF they had the real information about the situation, would have yanked support for Bush's little "pre-emtive" (aka first, unprovoked, strike) agains a soverign country. I think we would have kept focus on Afhghanistan, and AQ as the primary target.

And maybe, just maybe, we wouldn't have lost 4000+ Americans, and 100,000+ (who the hell can be sure? But that's one rough, if conservative, estimate) of innocent Iraqi civilians and saved $400 billion dollars in the process.

This is more than "woulda, coulda, shoulda"... It points to where power should be placed, and where power should be kept from within out government... for a very, very long time to come. Now that things have tipped away from the hawks, from the old men who have never seen blood, but who are bathing in it daily... maybe now we can start setting things right.

(in reply to Crush)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: History already vindicating Bush Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125