RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


Termyn8or -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 9:48:30 AM)

Spin, not the worst point ever made, in fact tis true, we have allowed the government to become too powerful. Now we have two things, first of all there are parts of the Constitution that severly inhibit the LAWFUL use of the government's force on the People of this country, however that is assuming they obey the law.

What's more, all they can do is destroy, and in being armed you force their hand. Will they play trump out of turn ? Maybe, but consider this. You live in an area where all your neighbors are heavily armed, as well as yourself. Cops and other government agenteur are afraid to come there. We have our own security, and they can't even come get people or take their property, even for taxes. They can't do anything because they need intelligence, otherwise it is a suicide mission.

Maintaining such a situation for a long period is unrealistic, but for them to realize that their power is not truly absolute could go a long way in straightening things out. I'll reiterate a bit about McVeigh now, just for a moment.

McVeigh was an idiot.  By bombing that building during the day with all the people in it he caused a backlash. Anyone who has had enough of this government shit and is not willing to take it anymore, he set back quite a ways. Laws have changed, it all got harder to do and last but not least it had a very negative effect on public opinion. This to the point where legit unorganized militias were scrutinized.

If he wanted to do it right he would have found more like him and in the dead of night, with alot less people in the buildings, did a bunch of them at the same time. That would have shown organizational skills and of course resulted in that second thought, before the government decided to take more.But no he had to do it his way. We just don't have that much talent for war.

That's the problem when Men have the desire for peace in their heart, not that I deny this in myself. But when push comes to shove, you kill. We waste money on wars for profit, and I mean that in a different way. Went into Iraq and it's nothing but a money pit. All that was needed was tell the Men "KILL". Kill everyone, walk through there and make sure none of them are breathing. But no we have to preserve certain things so we can steal from them better, to finance our green zone, probably has golf courses by now. WTF.

Cut loose, win and get out. That's what Men do when REALLY threatened.

Face the killer instinct, and realize that you are not the only one with it. There are plenty of others.

Just don't kill today. With a gun in your hand it is your choice. If it happens to be an AK47, well so be it.

T




thishereboi -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 9:49:13 AM)

Actually this is a thread about why Obama lied, but because the libs can't come up with a good excuse, they are going to turn it into a rant against guns.




philosophy -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 9:51:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Actually this is a thread about why Obama lied, but because the libs can't come up with a good excuse, they are going to turn it into a rant against guns.


....ah, i see. so what you're saying is ColdWarrior is a liberal?

From post 28 this thread....
"the OP is about the second ammendment, dont try to derail it or shift focus. "




DomKen -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 9:52:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterShake69

i would be more fearful of Obamas personal militia.


“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” he said Wednesday. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Previously debunked. Quote isn't what you claim it to be.
http://www.collarchat.com/m_2247442/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm#2247936




thishereboi -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 9:59:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Actually this is a thread about why Obama lied, but because the libs can't come up with a good excuse, they are going to turn it into a rant against guns.


....ah, i see. so what you're saying is ColdWarrior is a liberal?

From post 28 this thread....
"the OP is about the second ammendment, dont try to derail it or shift focus. "



I guess that just shows there are people on both sides who can't read the op, but to be honest I don't really read his posts and didn't see that.


edited to add....And I should not have said "the libs" as I don't believe all libs think or act one way any more than I think all cons do. So I apolgize for slipping into that one.




rulemylife -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:01:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Actually this is a thread about why Obama lied, but because the libs can't come up with a good excuse, they are going to turn it into a rant against guns.


Actually, I don't quite know what this thread is about.

The title says it is about Obama lying but the first quote in the original post disputes that:


"As President Obama indicated during the campaign
, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder told reporters.



This is just another in a long line of recent threads on here where Obama does exactly what he said he was going to do and suddenly conservatives are surprised and outraged.




Kirata -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:05:11 AM)

~Fast Reply~
 
To no one in particular...
 
I think we could put an end to the tragic slaughter on our roads if we mandated that no vehicle could have more than 100 horsepower or a gas tank larger than 10 gallons.
 
[:D]
 
 
 




DomKen -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:05:46 AM)

Actually the assault weapons ban wasn't confiscatory so even if this law is passed no one is coming after anyone's legally acquired weapons.




Owner59 -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:08:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah

Owner59,

They already are. Talk to any Vice Cop that deals with Gang Bangers.

I know that the former desk Sgt of the N. Las Vegas Police Dept personally wishes everyone had one. Believes it would level the playing field a little. Then again I believe he also they should all be rounded up and put into a large vault with all sorts of weapons and let them sort thier own differences out.

Steel


So let`s go back to the old(not new) law banning them.





SteelofUtah -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:10:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah

Owner59,

They already are. Talk to any Vice Cop that deals with Gang Bangers.

I know that the former desk Sgt of the N. Las Vegas Police Dept personally wishes everyone had one. Believes it would level the playing field a little. Then again I believe he also they should all be rounded up and put into a large vault with all sorts of weapons and let them sort thier own differences out.

Steel


So let`s go back to the old(not new) law banning them.


Didn't work then won't work now, when you make them illegal you get more gun running. More non registered guns due to the fact that we cannot secure the illegal ones the idea to level the playing field if to give it to everyone.

Like I said I want a Tank.

Steel




WomenDontRule -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:13:46 AM)

The framers clearly intended that the populace in general, be sufficiently armed to a degree that would allow them to rise up against the government if the government tried to forcibly infringe on their rights. They were in essence saying that there should always be the means available to fight another revolution.

If you want some backup for this, look at how many decades  it took the post-revolution United States to create anything more than a token standing army...iand even then one of only a few thousand men. Only when war with France looked likely, was consent given to raising a large standing army, and that for defense. they even tapped Washington to lead it, who chose Hamilton to be his executive officer. Once the war threat subsided, the entire plan was abandoned.

The intent was from the start, to arm the people as opposed to the government...though Washington certainly felt it was a mistake to not have a standing army of some size, evidenced by his recommendations to Congress upon surrendering his sword. But basically, there was a lot of fear/sentiment against a standing army, as that model looked too much like what they had just finished fighting and a standing army could be used to supress dissent. Look how quicky the mustering of militia put down Shay's (sp? ) Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion. .




popeye1250 -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:23:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Actually the assault weapons ban wasn't confiscatory so even if this law is passed no one is coming after anyone's legally acquired weapons.


DomKen, that's not the point, it is simply not the *job-description* of *Our Government* to try to tell The People what to do!
Our government exists to serve us not to dictate to us.
If your congressman or senator came to your house and dropped trou and told you to speak into "Mr. Microphone" would you do it?




Jack45 -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:31:34 AM)

"Yes We Can . . . Ban Guns"--Obama Announces Gun Ban Agenda Before The Final Vote Count Is In Friday, November 07, 2008 Senator Barack Obama's presidential campaign slogan, "the audacity of hope," should have instead been "the audacity of deceit." After months of telling the American people that he supports the Second Amendment, and only hours after being declared the president-elect, the Obama transition team website announced an agenda taken straight from the anti-gun lobby--four initiatives designed to ban guns and drive law-abiding firearm manufacturers and dealers out of business
See also: http://gunbanobama.com/




BoiJen -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:32:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

No, he's not going to give you a weapon, only the ones who join his security force. Big difference.


"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder told reporters.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6960824&page=1

Just sayin...the discussion came about firearms because some of saw the error in the OP. I did at least otherwise I wouldn't have posted.

As I said sarcasm...I know no one is gonna hand me a firearm...primarily because I would play with it.




Jack45 -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:34:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

~Fast Reply~
 
To no one in particular...
 
I think we could put an end to the tragic slaughter on our roads if we mandated that no vehicle could have more than 100 horsepower or a gas tank larger than 10 gallons.
 
[:D]
 
 
 


Don't give them any ideas
[;)]




thishereboi -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:35:54 AM)

You can come over any time and play with my guns.

[sm=alien.gif]




BoiJen -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:38:27 AM)

lol...how about you come down here...the whether is much nicer from understanding as is the beach....besides I could use a distraction ;-)

PS I would like to make a suggestion of combining this thread and the thread about how some chick is uncomfortable with porn the depicts "forced sex"...again...just sayin I think it would be a lot more interesting




thishereboi -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:43:38 AM)

If I don't get a job soon, I may take you up on that.




BoiJen -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:46:20 AM)

we have an extra room...

MsKitty got a job last week and if you don't mind selling laptop and cell phone accessories at the lowest prices on the market as a distributor then we can talk to her cousin about getting you a job here too.




Gwynvyd -> RE: Remember when Obama said he wouldn't come after people's guns? (2/26/2009 10:58:26 AM)

Ok.. so taking *ASSULT WEAPONS* is a bad thing....

In your quote "Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border."

Buuuuuuut according to a whole lot of ya'll Obama is basically aiding these drug cartels.. and his being prez has made it easier, and boosted them into fighting more.

( No dumbasses.. it has been that way for years. I know folks on the boarder patrol. Nothing new.. except they can now get assult guns from the US smuggled in... *AHEM* )

You cant have it both ways...

Brady was right.. we need this law. Having been in Law Enforcement this law makes good sense.

You dont shoot a deer, rabbit or any damn thing with an assult rifle. If your dick is that small to need one buy some damn viagra.

These are used as street sweepers in the drug and gang wars. Police dpeartments will hardly pony up for a fucking mossburg cruiser, little alone assult weapons to fight the thugs on their own level.

Billy bob does not need to "prove his manlieness" buy owning an assult rifle. He can protect his familiy, and shoot game just fine with out needing an assult riffle. These idjits just annoy the fuck out of me.

When G Money Home-slice decides to car jack your little lady with an freaking street sweeper... then we will hear some bitching.... oh yeah.. it is supposed to be the old West. Ya'll dont believe in the police.

*rolls her eyes*

Gwyn





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875