Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
The Iraq withdrawal is on schedule as Obama said during his campaign. False, it's already been extended beyond his campaign rhetoric of not approving any more expenditure beyond the last Senate vote approving funding through May 2009. He latest treatise on the subject extends the war a minimum of 15 months though August 2010. Good news for the locals - they have another year to kill US soldiers for the benefit of protecting 'big oil' interests in the region. It also makes a representation of permanent US occupation. Oh yeah, he's using terms oddly similar to those used during Vietnam. Back then it was 'military advisers'. Is that lesson still taught in schools? The Administration now wants to call them things like 'trainers' and 'civilian protectors'. Our soldiers, our money, going to protect non-US civilians. That's the platform President Obama ran on? Not by my memory. Yours? quote:
The administration now considers Aug. 31, 2010, the end date for Iraq war operations. That timetable is slower than Obama had promised voters, but still hastens the U.S. exit. Even with the drawdown, a sizable U.S. force of 35,000 to 50,000 U.S. troops will stay in Iraq under a new mission of training, civilian protection and counterterrorism. Source: WE'LL BE THERE A WHILE quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Transparency in our government is in and of itself a worthy and attainable goal Merc,and that too is a representative reality...or at least it should be. Mike, agreed and "should be" is the correct representation in this instance. Self serving disclosure is a transparency better called a facade. When and if, the transparency isn't political party specific I'll see it as not serving an agenda when it occurs. Hasn't been one that falls under that stipulation.
|