Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
Sunshine, Which side of the discussion do you support. The first sentence of your post: quote:
Yeah, I too would have to agree that 24/7 Real Time (meaning living with the person) is a myth. Or the sentence that starts the last paragraph: quote:
There are people who really seem to always be "submissive" real life, 24/7, but I think they are rare. I hope you don't see that as picking on you. Unlike Atlantis, yet undiscovered in fact so still correctly identified as a myth; seeing one occurance of 24/7 excludes it from being considered a myth. Just as one "Big-Foot" capture would end that debate. No matter, the whole concept of 24/7 is as complex as it is confusing. It's not hard to get yourself painted in a corner where you've disagreed with yourself. 24/7 goes way beyond the simple premise of just wanting to do so. There are many myths. If there is one myth, it's that any one perspective is correct. But what is interesting is that I've yet to read one post from a couple living 24/7 saying that anyway but theirs is wrong or impossible. Yet everyone who has considered it and discounted trying it; or tried it and failed proceeds to rationalize that it's existence is an impossibility or a myth. From our perspective it's amusing. There was a thread regarding the issue of the validity of saying; "Because I said so!" to 'unmentionables'. I guess it's okay to make that argument to adults. People fail in 24/7 attempts most often because they set themselves up to fail. Ironically, the failure comes more frequently from the "life" side of the effort, versus the "lifestyle" side. The solution is there, at least in the evaluation part of the decision. Because 24/7 isn't a lifestyle. 24/7 is LIFE. Before entering into an arrangement you have to determine if you are comfortable in your life. You can not imagine how often I hear from beth how her former men would find her desires "freakish", which she now has as routine. Yes many of these are physical or sexual, but just as many are the "submissive" activities of maintaining a house, sacrificing a career, or assigning decisions regarding basic activities such as dressing, eating, drinking, to someone else. As a Master, you have to be prepared to accept the responsibility. More important, you need to understand the implications of taking on that responsibility. Is it easy? Funny thing is-it is! Assessing if it's easy is another self evaluation test. It should be easy. If it's your life as you want it to be, if it fulfills your dreams of the way you want to live, it should be easy. Just yesterday, driving in LA, beth noted that it's a hell of lot more comfortable to be naked at our home than it is to be out wearing clothing. So do you think my rule for her to be naked is a hard rule for her to follow? If it's hard to do something you tend to avoid it as much as possible. Some tasks and duties in and of their nature are not easy, but the doing them, doing them as part of your life should be easy. Easy, FUN, fulfilling; again from either side, assesses whether you "got it right". "Style" it all you want, just make sure you got the "life" part down cold. There are common issues cited regarding the argument that 24/7 isn't possible. Work responsibility is usually at the top of that list. I'd agree with that position. If beth needed to work outside the home, we could not live as we do. It's a matter of pragmatic fact. It's the standing fact behind an important position that I hold; "Don't seek a slave until you can afford one." That does not read, "don't play", "don't enjoy, "your not real if you don't"; but as one who has a slave who has and does, when required, greet me at the threshold naked, in chains, holding the leash in her teeth, and my drink in her hands; don't argue that it's a myth. I smiled when reading the bath example. It hit close to home. I'll give you a real case example. I remember a few years back, calling from my office one day I asked beth to get some information from my home office. she picked up the phone, went to the office and got it. Only afterward when I asked "what were you doing?" did she tell me, "she was in the bath". I would not have made the request had I known, but the point was that the first thought that went through her mind was to obey, not to excuse or interject to tell me about her situation first. she wasn't and isn't "annoyed" by being asked to do something which fulfills her. Now I guess you can all think to describe beth as a doormat for reacting that way. The reality is it takes a very strong person to commit to a way of life so completely 24/7. And that is no myth from either end of the flogger.
|