LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: catize I’m not talking about acronyms, other people brought those up. If a cliché is not true all of the time, then we shouldn’t use them as if they are always true. That’s my point. But I enjoyed your post. By that line of thinking, we should never use any particular word unless it has a singular definition. What you are preferring is aclichébe an absolute, when really all it needs be is a general understanding of a probable result due to past examples. Something that happens often enough in similar circumstances for it to most likely be true. To your question of whether I think experience or lack thereof, has a positive or negative effect on a D/s dynamic, I would say it is impossible to answer. There are too many factors which would also contribute to a dynamic which are unknown. For example, a sub can have experience in serving a drink to her former Dominant. If that sub is unwilling to change how a drink is served to her new Dominant, that's a problem. If she's willing to learn the new way, the past experience doesn't become an issue. Same with inexperience. From the other side, if you're talking about the Dominant, and that Dominant happens to like S/m play as a Top, inexperience could be an issue. An experienced one could be a problem too, if their ego has gotten so big that they believe they no longer make mistakes or have been doing it 'so long' that they ignore safety. There aren't cliches that make Me grit My teeth. I get that for every general rule, there will always be exceptions. Someone might have to show Me that they are that exception, but that doesn't mean the majority of probable truth doesn't exist.
< Message edited by LadyPact -- 3/15/2009 5:58:17 AM >
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|