Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Validity of Clichés


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Validity of Clichés Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 8:13:35 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

 No, I think common sense or lack thereof does.


Yes, there is that!

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 8:15:28 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

  idea that there are (usually) 10 men to every woman on a dating site just doesn't add up. Yet we, the collective we, doesn't doubt or test or wonder about this. 


Now that is one I hadn’t questioned!  I always just accepted that little bit of data. 

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to feydeplume)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 8:17:07 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
To remove the work analogy, if we were non-kinky would we expect our new boyfriend/girlfriend to be just like the last one?

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 8:18:16 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
 
And as you can see by my words that you quoted, I myself am guilty of using absolute statements!  

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 8:32:54 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Do you think experience, or lack of, has a positive or negative impact on the D/s dynamic?

I believe that it has the same impact that it would have on a relationship that was NOT D/s.

Relationships are relationships; everyone enters into a new one with different ideas of what will happen, where it will go, and how it will get there. Sometimes, experience can add to the relationship, sometimes it can detract. It all depends on those involved and how they want things to progress.

It has nothing at all to do with D/s or M/s; and everything to do with individual expectations, wants, and needs.

Just my thoughts.

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 11:18:07 AM   
Jeptha


Posts: 780
Joined: 9/18/2008
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci

Yes. To me, the whole "lifestyle" or "WIITWD" thing is one huge boring cliche in and of itself. The idea that there is a "vanilla" world that is so unlike a BDSM world is just ludicrous to me let alone that the folks living in the "BDSM" world are more enlightened, advanced, open minded, accepting, etc. It's absolutely nothing less than stupid and utterly wrong to perpetuate such nonsense. So yeah, it's all one big goofy cliche in my little book.......................luci
Really?
I see a pretty huge difference. If I look over to my partner and say "get on the floor you dirty little cunt" or somesuch (something that is within the parameters of what she and I have agreed upon), that is just hugely different from a "vanilla" relationship.

I use the word "vanilla" to signify that difference. I don't use it to put down anyone. I'm not saying or implying that vanilla is bland or inferior.

But there just seems to me to be such an obvious difference there that I'm having trouble understanding why people seem to be denying it.

On another level, I don't have orgasms from vanilla sex*. I have no dysfunction that I'm aware of ; the cock gets hard and stays hard, but straight up fucking or a basket of blowjobs just doesn't trip my trigger.

Again; just very different. Again, again; not saying one is better. I'd love to have a bit more normal sex life, actually. Have even considered hypnosis in that regard.

*Now, I know for some it isn't about sex, (~ they can bring their own perspective to the discussion), but at some point most everybody wants to have a sex life of some sort. If we take that as our point of departure, than it is, in addition to whatever else, about sex.


< Message edited by Jeptha -- 3/15/2009 11:22:42 AM >

(in reply to slaveluci)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/15/2009 12:02:55 PM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeptha

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveluci

Yes. To me, the whole "lifestyle" or "WIITWD" thing is one huge boring cliche in and of itself. The idea that there is a "vanilla" world that is so unlike a BDSM world is just ludicrous to me let alone that the folks living in the "BDSM" world are more enlightened, advanced, open minded, accepting, etc. It's absolutely nothing less than stupid and utterly wrong to perpetuate such nonsense. So yeah, it's all one big goofy cliche in my little book.......................luci
Really?
I see a pretty huge difference. If I look over to my partner and say "get on the floor you dirty little cunt" or somesuch (something that is within the parameters of what she and I have agreed upon), that is just hugely different from a "vanilla" relationship.

I use the word "vanilla" to signify that difference. I don't use it to put down anyone. I'm not saying or implying that vanilla is bland or inferior.

But there just seems to me to be such an obvious difference there that I'm having trouble understanding why people seem to be denying it.

On another level, I don't have orgasms from vanilla sex*. I have no dysfunction that I'm aware of ; the cock gets hard and stays hard, but straight up fucking or a basket of blowjobs just doesn't trip my trigger.

Again; just very different. Again, again; not saying one is better. I'd love to have a bit more normal sex life, actually. Have even considered hypnosis in that regard.

*Now, I know for some it isn't about sex, (~ they can bring their own perspective to the discussion), but at some point most everybody wants to have a sex life of some sort. If we take that as our point of departure, than it is, in addition to whatever else, about sex.


Not to pick but, like many others, I too look at the whole 'lifestyle, WIITWD, ' BS as nothing more than exactly that...bull shit.

Not everyone, but many DO seem to think that engaging in BDSM or a D/s or M/s relationship somehow makes them 'more'. They seem to think, naively, that just because it's D/s or M/s or BDSM, that somehow...EVERYTHING is going to be different, and better than just a 'normal' relationship.

It's an outlook that all too often many find to be nothing more than a fantasy, and when reality intrudes, they find themselves floundering, wondering what could have possibly gone wrong.



_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to Jeptha)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/16/2009 10:39:56 AM   
Jeptha


Posts: 780
Joined: 9/18/2008
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline
I agree that you still have the same relationship dynamics, meaning all the ways that all couples relate and interact. How one person relates to another. D/s doesn't bypass any of that stuff.

Saying "wiitwd" doesn't mean that I get to skip all that awkward emotional processing, and so forth, or that we are now transported to the magical realm of honorable knights and princesses.

But that acronym does refer to a (I guess any) category of activities that are generally still considered to be outside of the mainstream. I think it mainly exists so people don't have to constantly be referring to types of play on the one hand and relationship types on the other, but they can refer to both or either with one handy term, without specifying.
As such , I think it's useful.

I'm not saying it's all ponies and unicorns, at all.
But there are ways in which it is similar, and ways in which it is strikingly different.

Those probably should be differentiated.

Otherwise, it's probably as sloppy to say "everything's the same" as it is to dreamily lisp how magically transformational it all is.



< Message edited by Jeptha -- 3/16/2009 10:43:39 AM >

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/16/2009 12:58:01 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

There are many clichés floating around the BDSM world. .  One I see from time to time is that a person who has submitted to a previous dominant will struggle with the transition to a new relationship because the ‘new’ dominant has different expectations.
 
I don’t see any down side to experience.  With experience comes the knowledge of what one is capable of giving or giving up. 
  I don't usually see a downside to experience either UNLESS that previous experience is used as a way to Overtly or Covertly make the dominant/submissive feel as if they are wrong because of that uniqueness you speak of later rather than following what the past dominant/submissive did.  I've seen this most often when dealing with submissives who have been "mentored" in positioning, serving, play, and sexuality...all the aspects of submission.  
 

(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/16/2009 6:37:08 PM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Otherwise, it's probably as sloppy to say "everything's the same" as it is to dreamily lisp how magically transformational it all is.  


If we were ‘the same’, then there would be no reason for the labels of dominance/submission or master/mistress/slave.  Granted, not everyone who practices some form of dynamic or activity (under the big umbrella called BDSM) want to be labeled as such.   
I don’t think anyone who is actually doing this stuff would be surprised that they continue to live a life, though.   
I think a good thing to compare it to would be people who are vegetarian or vegan.  They practice different eating habits; their meals are not like mine! I would guess their trips to the grocery store are quite different from carnivorous humans, and their cook books and recipes are very different also. When they talk about protein they are not referring to burgers or steak.  But their work, leisure time, T.V. time, sleep—their lives!-are ‘the same’. 


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to Jeptha)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/16/2009 6:38:16 PM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

 I've seen this most often when dealing with submissives who have been "mentored" in positioning, serving, play, and sexuality...


 
This brings me full circle back to what I said in my teacher/student thread.  There is a difference between learning tasks and learning submission! 


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/18/2009 10:54:20 PM   
kidwithknife


Posts: 193
Joined: 9/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

FR to both catize and slaveluci ~   If you see as I do the wider kink together with the BDSM lifestyle (As differing to that where people are only involved occasionally for a spot of fun or to get their rocks off), as one of the many sub cultures abounding in society, it would be difficult to see the whole as a cliché any more than to see any other sub culture including various religious and political sub cultures as clichés. However this is really a personal view and is going to vary according to the individual.
I think the difference between  BDSM and the religious/political subcultures is that the latter quite obviously have very different values from mainstream society.  If we're talking about the fringes, anyway. I'd consider the Hare Krishnas a subculture in a way I wouldn't the Church of England.

But I'm not sure that there are enough differences between mainstream society and BDSM for BDSM to qualify as a genuine subculture in the sociological sense of the word.

As a whole, anyway.  I'd agree with you that a lot of it comes down to individuals.  There are certainly BDSMers who are subcultural, even countercultural.  I just don't believe that's the case for the whole scene.


_____________________________

We went to see the fall of Rome - I thought it would please us
To watch how the mighty go in a blaze of hubris
But I just stood there hypnotised by all the beautiful madness


(New Model Army, Into the Wind)

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/19/2009 12:11:45 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kidwithknife

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

FR to both catize and slaveluci ~   If you see as I do the wider kink together with the BDSM lifestyle (As differing to that where people are only involved occasionally for a spot of fun or to get their rocks off), as one of the many sub cultures abounding in society, it would be difficult to see the whole as a cliché any more than to see any other sub culture including various religious and political sub cultures as clichés. However this is really a personal view and is going to vary according to the individual.
I think the difference between  BDSM and the religious/political subcultures is that the latter quite obviously have very different values from mainstream society.  If we're talking about the fringes, anyway. I'd consider the Hare Krishnas a subculture in a way I wouldn't the Church of England.

But I'm not sure that there are enough differences between mainstream society and BDSM for BDSM to qualify as a genuine subculture in the sociological sense of the word.

As a whole, anyway.  I'd agree with you that a lot of it comes down to individuals.  There are certainly BDSMers who are subcultural, even countercultural.  I just don't believe that's the case for the whole scene.



Within the general BDSM unbrella, is included the Victorian, Gorean and similar lifestyles which is a sub culture and it is for that reason I batched BDSM with the others I mentioned. For my part, I live and breath the Victorian Lifestyle so that it is an integral part of me, being brought up in that culture, just as my Pagan Lifestyle is an equal psrt of me as you would expect with an ordained Pagan Priest.In this I am not alone as manmy of my friends, Peers and associates live a Gorean Lifestyle, and from all the indicators which differentiate such things, we do fit within the accepted format of a sub-culture, or so one of my Lodge Brethren who heads the Sociology Dept in one of the Universities here tells me.

< Message edited by IronBear -- 3/19/2009 12:16:23 AM >


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to kidwithknife)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/19/2009 6:35:44 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize
I don’t see any down side to experience.  With experience comes the knowledge of what one is capable of giving or giving up. 
 
Not only do I know what I like, but I also know what I can do without if the dominant does not like it.  I know what I am willing/able to submit to whether or not I like that

I don’t think it takes an Einstein to realize that every dominant is unique.


That's a bit of disappointing precedent in my opinion. On one hand you state that every dominant is unique while on the other hand you imply that you might write off activity X as something you cannot submit to after have tried it with only one dominant. If every dominant is unique then is it not unreasonable to assume that every dominant might do activity X just a little bit different. You might hate doing it with dominant A but really get into it with dominant B but you'll never find out if you draw the line after dominant A. I agree that experience is generally a good thing but you have to know how to temper it.



(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/23/2009 5:17:27 PM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

  That's a bit of disappointing precedent in my opinion. On one hand you state that every dominant is unique while on the other hand you imply that you might write off activity X as something you cannot submit to after have tried it with only one dominant. If every dominant is unique then is it not unreasonable to assume that every dominant might do activity X just a little bit different. You might hate doing it with dominant A but really get into it with dominant B but you'll never find out if you draw the line after dominant A. I agree that experience is generally a good thing but you have to know how to temper it. 

You present a good argument which made me reconsider my words.  I would agree that there are some things I would re-try with Dominant B.  But! (as a friend of mine says, ‘the truth comes after ‘but’   ) there were some things that led to very unpleasant and emotionally painful results with Dominant A.
I believe the pain arose from the fact that I had compromised my own values.  In those instances, I would discuss my feelings with Dominant B and explain they simply were not things that I would be willing to do again.   
Yes, every person <<no matter the label>> in my life is unique—however (another word for ‘but’!!) I am the common denominator in all my relationships. 



_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/23/2009 6:46:23 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize
To remove the work analogy, if we were non-kinky would we expect our new boyfriend/girlfriend to be just like the last one?


Well thankfully I learned from my mistakes. But I know an awful lot of people who keep picking the same types of guys, and complain about how this one also drinks, or doesn't call or whatever.

We come into relationships with unspoken expectations. If when you were growing up, your father always took out the garbage then you are likely to have the unspoken, perhaps even unrealized expectation that your partner will take it out, since to you it is a male job. If you don't discuss it, and if in his house it was his mother who took it out, then you would begin to resent him for sticking you with this job.

So yes, I think it is quite likely that people do complain when they don't get what they are expecting, even when they aren't aware of their expectations.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The Validity of Clichés - 3/23/2009 7:30:21 PM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

   I think it is quite likely that people do complain when they don't get what they are expecting, even when they aren't aware of their expectations.


Yes, it does happen frequently.  Sometimes the repetition is fairly benign such as always choosing a blonde, or always dating an older/younger person.   We’ve all met (or been) someone who repeatedly chooses an ***abusive; alcoholic; shopoholic; never-can-keep-a-job, etc etc*** partner. 
And those of us who learned from our mistakes did so by examining what went wrong and why it was wrong. 
That’s all I’m suggesting here, that it is beneficial to question our knee jerk responses and scrutinize all the dogma that we repeat in order to reject it if we are not able to present a rationale for it. 


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 37
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Validity of Clichés Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094