RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


philosophy -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 11:08:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArmoredOne

We admire the strongest.  The fastest runner, the biggest football player, the baseball player that hits the most homeruns.  We admire the young ones that win the spelling contests or write the winning essay. 


"The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not winning but taking part; the essential thing in life is not conquering but fighting well. - Pierre de Coubertin"




kittinSol -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 11:18:40 AM)

He was French, they never win anything, of course he'd say something like that, the cowardly good for nuffin frog [8D] .




MadAxeman -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 11:25:21 AM)

Winning isn't everything as stated.
It hasn't helped the Australian culture, such as it is.




UPSG -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:16:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I've known several intelligent people that spoke multiple languages. It didn't make them admirable or worthy of leading people.

As for what the pope said in that snippit, it reminds me of far too many political speeches I've heard. A lot of blah blah blah blah, to cover up that they will simply continue on with their own agenda while using the smoke screen of doing something wonderful for the poor lost souls in the world.

When the catholic church sells off its huge fortune, in art, real estate, etc.......and gives it all towards actually DOING something seriously productive in this world, instead of hiding behind it and preaching a bunch of outdated nonsense, I might give them some small amount of consideration as a worth while organization.


I don't think Catholics really care what you think, be they Mexican or Angolan.

The Catholic Church is one of not the largest material charity organization in the world. The churches or "cathedrals" belong to the heritage of the Church from one generation to the next. The basilica in Milwaukee was built by poor Polish Catholic immigrants. Many Catholic churches were. Many of the huge cathedrals in Europe were built over generations and often times financed by various guilds.

In comparative terms to modern industrial based and serviced based economies the Vatican is no where comparative to cities like Milwaukee or Chicago in wealth. That's basic economics. And certainly in hell can't be compared to the wealth of nation-states like the United States.

But again, these things belong to Catholics, like the White House belongs to the heritage and people of the United States. Catholics have every right - over the course of 2,000 years I might add - to acquire material properties.




I received Catholicism from my mother (not my father - he's not even Catholic) and not from any Pope or Priest or whatever spooky image Hollywood likes to produce. Like many other Catholics it was my mother that was trying to steer me as a child in the direction of the Priesthood. And my mother like many Catholics in the U.S. has been (and she as always remained) a voting Democrat. My mother also marched in the U.S. Civil Rights Movement and was incarcerated for it.

This bigoted idea that all Catholics are this one narrow way inflicting suffering on all men comes from ingrained prejudice. Catholic Priests and Popes almost always come from Catholic families just as Jewish Rabbi's come from Jewish families or Buddhist monks and nuns come from Buddhist families. The Mexicans receive their Catholic religion from their families like Thai Buddhists receive their Buddhist religion from their Buddhist families. President Lula in Brazil is Catholic - I know he was very much so in his young adult years from a biography I have on him. The cat is missing one finger he lost working in a factory, he grew up in literal abject poverty (not what economist would term "relative poverty"), dropped out of grade school as a child, became a union leader, was incarcerated opposing the U.S. backed military regime of Brazil, eventually became President (both him and Chavez have Lincoln like rises to the Presidency never to be heard of again in the U.S. - where Harvard and a handful of universities, not UW-Milwaukee, are King Makers), and has passed one of the most praised "cash-transfer" programs in the world: The Bolsa Familia Program (even New York City is consider modeling it).

President Lula remarked before Obama was elected, projecting his win, that his (Lula) rise and that of Chavez, Evo Morales, and a former Catholic Bishop in another Latin American country, and now that of Obama in the United States, marks the great changes taking place throughout the Americas. I understand his comment about the former Catholic Bishop (The Vatican does not want Priests running for public offices and wants that left to the secular world - it only wants to remain in the sphere of teaching and or lobbying and influencing it's flock, so, the Bishop requested to the Vatican to be allowed to step down from his Priestly position so he could fight and serve the poor and his people in the secular sphere of civil service) because I've read a couple of books from the renowned Liberation Theologians in Latin America and I know Catholic clergy very close association with the poor in many of those nations. It's claimed a number of the U.S. sponsored Evangelical Protestant groups, operating in Latin America, are linked with the CIA. I don't know how true that is but I know some of them push not just a "prosperity gospel" but advocate right-wing politics and neoliberal economic policies throughout Latin America.

I went to a predominantly black Catholic grade school and then to a predominantly white Catholic high school. Both schools were shaped culturally, not just by Catholicism but by local racial histories and ethnic cultures. Yes, there were racist white kids at that school, its the society and homes they came from. A former Black Panther I know told me about watching Catholic, working class, Polish men punch Catholic nuns in the face as they marched acrossed the famed viaduct that separated "Poland from Africa" in Milwaukee in the 60's. Thos Polish Catholics were not the mixed-race morenas and mulatta Catholics in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. I understand this easily as do the multitudes of Latino Catholics who view Catholics as looking like me. Who's right, who's wrong, is the truth somwehere in the middle? Does your "truth" become the infallible truth?

I know Americans (United Statesians) view "Catholic" as = "white," "male," "Pope in Rome," and "rich chuches." People can deny this all they want but I hear it in the tone and I see it in the diction of the posts and or comments. People of the United Stastes also view "America" and "American" as = "the United States" and "U.S. citizens." Europeans often fall into this line of reasoning too.




As for me, I admire the Pope for his ability to speak several languages, but I also am a product of the Generation X, Black-American males, and specifically in the culture of the Midwest and Milwaukee. The post-industrial experience of the U.S. has been significantly different for us. The "economy is bad" now for White-Americans so it's consequently "a national problem." The economy has been "bad" for fuckin years for us. In my world cats my age - and often younger - are killed or go to prison for the better part of their life. I have friend my age right now in prison doing over 30 years each. A good friend of mine - raised Protestant (though he never was an active Christian) - has just been sentenced to 10 years in prison. None of these men have college education. Their education was the streets. A very refined, and highly educated, Black-American Priest advised me clamly and spoke to me like a man, several years ago, stating: "You need to go back to school, so that if you have a family you can adequately take care of them." Two of my friends in prison right now left children behind out here in Milwaukee.

So, yeah, the Pope speaking several languages to you might not mean anything, but for me I look at him and find some little encouragement to endeavor for similar.

Was that Priest that advised me spreading "evil"? Was his suggestion to me something that could harm Black-American women and families?

It doesn't matter how you answer that. I know how to answer it for myself. And for me that's what's important.




UPSG -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:18:57 PM)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Groppi

quote:

Father James Edmund Groppi (November 16, 1930November 4, 1985) was a Roman Catholic priest and noted civil rights activist.[1]


quote:

At first assigned to St. Veronica's Church in Milwaukee, in 1963 Groppi was transferred to St. Boniface, the latter parish having a predominantly African-American congregation. It was then that Groppi became interested in - and active in - the cause of civil rights for black Americans, participating in the 1963 March on Washington and the Selma to Montgomery marches in 1965 on behalf of the Voting Rights Act, also working with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference voter registration project, led by Martin Luther King, Jr., during the summer of 1965.

Later in 1965, he returned to Milwaukee, becoming the advisor to the Milwaukee chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) Youth Council, organizing protests against the segregation of Milwaukee public schools. He also became second vice president of Milwaukee United School Integration Committee (1965-1966) and advisor to the Milwaukee NAACP Youth Council (1965-1968).


Milwaukee had de facto segregation in the public schools I believe, by geography and not by laws. Certainly the housing patterns were "steered" for racial segregation (that would fall under "institutional racism" something that is not always officially "on the books"). Having read an essay written by a seminarian friend of mine, it would seem issues of housing values interlocked with some of these antagonisms stongly.




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:44:39 PM)

You are leaving out historical facts of memorable events like say, oh the Crusades and the Inquisition.  And the Catholic Church's position on women's rights, contraception, abortion and sexual abuse of unmentionables by clergy is deplorable.


quote:

ORIGINAL: UPSG
This bigoted idea that all Catholics are this one narrow way inflicting suffering on all men comes from ingrained prejudice.




rulemylife -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:52:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

You are leaving out historical facts of memorable events like say, oh the Crusades and the Inquisition.  And the Catholic Church's position on women's rights, contraception, abortion and sexual abuse of unmentionables by clergy is deplorable.


You really have to understand that in many ways the Catholic Church is a cult-like atmosphere.

The arguments being made here are a prime example.

I remember Thanksgiving dinner with a number of my very devout relatives who were adamant in their defense of the priests in the sexual abuse scandals.

I'll never forget one of my aunts arguing that because priests are not allowed to marry this was somehow excusable.




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:54:30 PM)

Yet another reason I avoid holiday dinners with certain family members.  The best part is when they look at me all wide eyed and ask, "But don't you believe in GOD?"




kittinSol -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 12:58:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval
"But don't you believe in GOD?"


"No, I believe in GOOD." :-)




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:06:45 PM)

I once almost caused a meltdown in the kitchen at one house.  The question that time was, "What do you think of Jesus?"  I said that he was a great teacher and prophet.
 
Somehow that was not enough.  Maybe it was the comparison to Moses, Isaiah and other Old Testament prophets that made the situation worse. 
 
Who knows?  [sm=dunno.gif]
 
 
I am long past caring what those individuals think.




kittinSol -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:14:31 PM)

Christianity is weird, when you think about its origins. There you had a Jewish independent thinker who fought the Temple with all his might for political reasons, and died for it, and two thousand years later people still try to propagate a message that he supposedly left about his divine origins... but that wasn't written about until hundreds of years after his death. And to top it all off, as a direct result of Jesus, and oblivious to the obvious lack of link, people believe condoms are evil and disapproved of by God. It's bizarre, really.




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:34:42 PM)

You sum it up very well.  I have always been amazed at the number of Christian cultures that persecuted the Jews since they share the same Old Testament scriptures.  Isn't that called the Torah?




LaTigresse -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:43:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: UPSG

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I've known several intelligent people that spoke multiple languages. It didn't make them admirable or worthy of leading people.

As for what the pope said in that snippit, it reminds me of far too many political speeches I've heard. A lot of blah blah blah blah, to cover up that they will simply continue on with their own agenda while using the smoke screen of doing something wonderful for the poor lost souls in the world.

When the catholic church sells off its huge fortune, in art, real estate, etc.......and gives it all towards actually DOING something seriously productive in this world, instead of hiding behind it and preaching a bunch of outdated nonsense, I might give them some small amount of consideration as a worth while organization.


I don't think Catholics really care what you think, be they Mexican or Angolan.


Apparently some of them do . . .




kittinSol -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:47:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

You sum it up very well.  I have always been amazed at the number of Christian cultures that persecuted the Jews since they share the same Old Testament scriptures.  Isn't that called the Torah?


First five books, yeah... It's all the same stuff. Christians = copycats [8D] (kidding, kidding, kidding...)




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 1:51:41 PM)

Add in the irony and tragedy of 3 major religions all based on holy scriptures with the same starting point of patriarchs and prophets that for centuries have been killing and maiming each other and tearing up Jerusalem.




LaTigresse -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 2:07:07 PM)

Makes me want to run right out and join.




philosophy -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 2:09:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: UPSG

Catholics have every right - over the course of 2,000 years I might add - to acquire material properties.



...while preaching the spiritual benefits of poverty? Some may call that hypocritical.




Vendaval -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 2:11:05 PM)

And promoting doctrine guaranteed to keep the peasants barefoot, pregnant, poor, producing plenty of young men ready to die in the Crusades or other Holy Wars.
 
"Thou shalt not kill?"




ArmoredOne -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 2:15:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArmoredOne

Personally, I am all for dropping enough machetes and other chopping style weapons into Africa, then building a nice thick batch of barbed wire around the entire continent and let them sort it out themselves.



I always wonder what kind of lunacy inspires people to write things like that. Do you realise what you're saying there, or are you just blinded by hate?


Blinded by hate?  I admit to a number of hatreds in this life, but I have never been blinded by it.  Inspired, perhaps, but that is something for another time.

Tired would be a better description of how I feel about this nonsense over there.  Tired of everyone looking to the U.S. to fix everything, and then getting pissed when we actually take steps to do something about it.  Tired of American food and money being shuttled over there en masse when America itself is tumbling to the ground from the inside out, like a rotten tooth.  Tired of every damned time I turn around, someone somewhere is bemoaning the conditions there and wants someone other than themselves to do something about it.

The simpliest cure is violence.  It's obviously what they want, what with this faction or that faction chopping up and mutilating some other faction over this grain of sand or that tree.  Perhaps the U.S. should demonstrate exactly what kind of standing army they have and start at the tip of South Africa and simply plow down everything from there to Ethopia and Monte Carlo?  That would certainly solve the whole issue.  Remove every person with the power to do anything other than wipe their own arse, and actually force them to not only come to accords over this bullcrap they keep fighting over, which is what is actually destroying the entire continent with the exception of a few shining examples of how it should be run.  Let them figure out exactly what kind of a government they want, LOAN them the resources to create said government, and then let them alone to go about their merry way now that they have what they want.

But since I have no desire to put more servicemen and women in the line of fire than there already is, mopping up a mess that N.A.T.O. caused and allowed to fester instead of letting the U.S. finish it the first time around when it would have been easier, the next best option is simply letting them do it themselves.  To do that would require weapons, and since machetes seem to be the weapon of choice, then arm them all equally and let them have at it fully and completely.

But, through all that typing, one thought did occur to me.

Is there some vapid reason that the one comment you quope is the only one you seemed capable of reacting to?  Did you not read the rest of it, or do you agree with it, or do you simply have no opinion on the rest of it and think that everyone should play nice and be courteous and all that nonsense?  I mean, honestly, is all you can think to do is highlight one sentence out of all the ones I typed that you, personally, deem offensive to your own perspectives and beliefs, rather than contend with the rest of it?

Was the bridge analogy a bit much for you or something?
/sarcasm




ArmoredOne -> RE: Condoms in Africa, best you can do ? (3/26/2009 2:21:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"even if he is trying to incite the masses"

I don't think I would have chosen the word incite, but then that is a subjective view.

However I accept it as a valid opinion. Sometimes perhaps I am testingmy core beliefs against the fire and brimstone of this merry group.

T


Without fire and a hammer, steel would never aquire the strength it has, compared to raw ore.  Nothing wrong with what you do, at least in my eyes.  Done the same thing myself in the past to try and line out exactly what I thought on a particular topic, although I tended to get a lot more invectives thrown my way than you seem to.  Kind of makes me jealous.

But the incite comment... well, you do seem to have a natural way of drawing the fire to you, so to speak, and since I doubt anyone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to post and share with others, incite seems a fair choice.  There are probably better words, but more undeserved ones.

AO




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875