cantilena -> RE: don't be surprised reverse question please (3/22/2009 7:16:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: chamberqueen I once gave my Master a small test. I wanted to see if he would enjoy sex any less if I stayed silent during it and did not seem to be responding. I could tell a definite difference - he did not enjoy himself as much if I was not also enjoying myself. I wrote to him about it after and explained that it had been a little bit of a test. He commended me for it and said that it was good that I was trying to figure out how best to please him. I was warmed by the thought that he would enjoy himself more if he knew that I also was. Any tests that I gave him were very small but they were specifically so that I could find out more about him and figure out just how much I could trust him. Purposely testing a Master over and over, whether through seeming reluctance to do a task or losing control of your words is playing with fire. While it may be forgiven (perhaps through punishment) it will not be tolerated forever unless it is something that he enjoys. Continual rebellion can destroy the trust that they have in you, as a sub or slave, and instead of him looking forward to seeing you it may start to feel like a burden. I wouldn't call that manipulative or even really "testing" in the sense sublace seemed to be describing, though. You know? I think in the beginning, doesn't everybody try different things with his or her partner to find out what brings the most pleasure? It's a completely different thing in my mind. Maybe the difference in my mind is in trying finding your partner's pleasure (getting to know somebody), rather than trying to find your partner's displeasure (testing). Gave me something to think about. Thanks!
|
|
|
|