sappatoti
Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006 From: the edge of darkness... Status: offline
|
After reading the article, I'm not convinced it's part of an extremist liberal agenda. This situation seems to be a case where good intentions were not tested thoroughly enough and implemented at the wrong time. That happens all of the time in government, from conservatives, moderates, and liberals. Those pushing for the ban against phosphate ladened detergents obviously did not test the green alternatives rigorously enough for use in hard mineral water. I think the response from the one official of the project that stated each household should install water softeners in order to make the non-phosphate detergents work was a bit short-sighted and callous, but then again, that's par for the course with governments which don't want to admit to having made a mistake. Note: As an aside, I think any government providing water to its citizens then implementing rules about the use of any specific type of detergents that do not work well with the water as supplied needs to do more to change the quality of their water. It's not right, IMO, to force consumers to pay more for an alternative detergent which, in turn, requires each consumer to spend even more to make the alternative work (by each installing their own softening treatment). At the very least, some sort of compromise needs to be struck between the government and its citizens with regards to the costs involved in bringing the water quality up to the level where it can work with the new detergents. This case, to me, is yet another example of governments acting first without doing the proper research, nothing more.
_____________________________
Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm... "Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932 If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!
|