RE: unreasonable request (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


Delphinus -> RE: unreasonable request (4/12/2009 4:27:45 PM)

Damn - Does this mean I have to stop whipping out my vibrator in the Lowe's parking lot?




LeatherBentOne -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 4:03:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jstmi

we were establishing a base of friendship and trust as we began to know each other, there was no cyber but i did feel some red flags could have been thrown at any point in the discussions. such as not telling me much about Himself and not having a normal vanilla discussion about what O/our lives are about. He chose to be very aggressive with the desire for me to commit to Him and this certainly was not acceptable behavior for a prospective Dom to be this way.

i have since told Him i will not have any communications any longer

thanks for all the great responses

jstmi



So now I know what you were doing parked in your driveway when I saw you a few weeks ago.  Love the new "profile" and "pic.




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 4:50:00 PM)

LOL... to the last two post!  I must be living in the wrong place!  I never get to see anything! 




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:08:10 PM)

So...to play a bit of devil's advocate (and the moral silliness aside): how much legal trouble can you realistically get into for what would amount to 'indecent exposure'?

All I'm really seeing here is an incompatibility in the 'thrill seeker' department between the OP and her (former?) Dom (which can be enough reason alone to part ways).




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:12:10 PM)

A number of us brought the legal side of things up earlier.  I wouldn't order my submissive to do anything that would get them into legal trouble... but, lol... if there was a show I ran into... in a decent setting.... I might stand and watch for a moment or two! lol




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:13:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jstmi

Happy to not be abused any longer by wannabes

If "wannabe" describes a D-type you muster the courage to desert only after acquiring justification from unknown posters on a message forum based on a difference of kink preference, I predict many more around the corner.




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:16:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

A number of us brought the legal side of things up earlier.  I wouldn't order my submissive to do anything that would get them into legal trouble... but, lol... if there was a show I ran into... in a decent setting.... I might stand and watch for a moment or two! lol

Unless there was some sort of blatant irreverence by her upon being questioned by an officer, I have a hard time thinking any real punishment (jail time...heck even a fine as opposed to just a warning) would come of it.

This is nothing akin to asking your sub/slave to rob a place or scream "fire" in a public theatre.




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:22:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

I wouldn't order my submissive to do anything that would get them into legal trouble...

What we're talking about is the likelihood of legal trouble and the realistic consequences.

I noticed you're in Missouri. Would you order your submissive to perform oral sex?




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:22:53 PM)

In some places, peeing in public can get you on the sex offender's registry. (indecent exposure)  Guess a lot would depend on who caught you.




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:24:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

I wouldn't order my submissive to do anything that would get them into legal trouble...

What we're talking about is the likelihood of legal trouble and the realistic consequences.

I noticed you're in Missouri. Would you order your submissive to perform oral sex?



LOL... I just moved here... thanks for that... my only answer can be... not in public! lol




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:26:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

LOL... I just moved here... thanks for that... my only answer can be... not in public! lol

Well, that's no fun at all. [:(]




marie2 -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:47:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

So...to play a bit of devil's advocate (and the moral silliness aside): how much legal trouble can you realistically get into for what would amount to 'indecent exposure'?


He told her to reach inside her clothing and touch herself.  Sounds more like public masturbation than "indecent exposure".  




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 5:58:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

So...to play a bit of devil's advocate (and the moral silliness aside): how much legal trouble can you realistically get into for what would amount to 'indecent exposure'?


He told her to reach inside her clothing and touch herself.  Sounds more like public masturbation than "indecent exposure".  

Well, that would make it even more to the point of not meriting as stringent a consequence, since there's no actual nudity.




marie2 -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 6:00:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

So...to play a bit of devil's advocate (and the moral silliness aside): how much legal trouble can you realistically get into for what would amount to 'indecent exposure'?


He told her to reach inside her clothing and touch herself.  Sounds more like public masturbation than "indecent exposure".  

Well, that would make it even more to the point of not meriting as stringent a consequence, since there's no actual nudity.



lmao...She could always tell the cop she had an itch.




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 6:06:13 PM)

ROFL




NihilusZero -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 6:13:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2

lmao...She could always tell the cop she had an itch.

Thanks. I feel a lot better knowing I'm not the only one who got that strange but rather humorous image in my head...

[:D]




IronBear -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 11:11:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2

lmao...She could always tell the cop she had an itch.

Thanks. I feel a lot better knowing I'm not the only one who got that strange but rather humorous image in my head...

[:D]



And she said: "Fleas my dear officer, I am afflicted my a plague of fleas down there. may I give you 10,000 fleas from 1,000 camels so you to may enjoy such an affliction in your crutch?"

Works for me, not sure what the results would be. Probably being arrested by a couple of hysterical cops




Lockit -> RE: unreasonable request (4/15/2009 11:22:35 PM)

ROFL... and cops with a story to tell...




CarinaKitty -> RE: unreasonable request (4/17/2009 12:15:34 AM)

My Master makes a lot of off the wall requests that He doesn't necissarily mean. If I don't think He's serious(or hope He's not) I am to ask, "Are you serious?" If He says yes, than no more questions or whines. If He says no, than I don't. However, He usually gets a hug and thank you afterwords.




RavenMuse -> RE: unreasonable request (4/17/2009 6:38:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

I would lose all respect for a Dominant who asked me to do something because they expected me NOT to do it. Especially something that could permanatly and very negitively effect my life. this would be a trust destroying deal breaker for me.


Bingo! If I give My girl an order I expect her to comply to the best of her ability. Too many possible variables in the OP's set up to determine wether or not I would issue that order in that place. If I did then it would be because I judged there to be a very low risk of negative outcome. If I thought there would be a high risk ten I would alter the instruction or not give it at all. My judgement is one of the things a girl is trusting in.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02