|
xBullx -> RE: Fear of Porn (4/6/2009 7:11:01 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: colouredin
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx
Superficial societal indoctrination perhaps; but most likely it stems from feelings spawned by prior relationships that seemingly validated these societal stereotypes that initiate selfishness inspired by insecurity.
Don't worry though, nature programmed you to be this way
Hmm despite the patronising response here it seems you are advocating BOTH nature and nurture in the same breath whether its 'in your experience or not' its still a contradiction in terms
Patronizing? It seems you might have a complex…
But really that’s simply your chosen interpretation, or perhaps a tactic intended to confuse the statement. You may pick the correct response to suit your purposes, as for me I already have my own assumption as to your objective.
So as it seems in your opinion she and society cannot nurture or attempt to “manipulate” conditions that have been thrust upon her by her nature? Do you define the rules of engagement for this subject matter or is there a book I can go too? <--- That is an example of patronizing! <--- another one!
In the same breath it might be possible that the female concerned would be insecure about her man’s possible interest in porn (or other females) due to her natural inclination as a submissive female to want surrender to her man but not want to compete with other girls. (Make note this is an opinion of mine: if she is actually a submissive she doesn’t really in her heart want a man that is HERS, she wants him to be his own man and possess her.) So in an open attempt to rid herself of any type of sexual competition (all girls hope to be “their” man’s best girl, this is actually a natural response, striving to be the best choice so she will be protected , as might be her offspring) she overtly makes it known that she would “disapprove” of any exterior sexual interests; thereby attempting to control his actions or choices through the use of certain brands of superficial manipulations that may have or have most likely been taught to her by this society, the society that has become ever increasingly open to an artificial equality rather than the acknowledgement of our intended predispositions. Our subject made the statements about being possessive. That my dear could have both natural and nurture reasoning, I wasn’t completely sure of her intent so I didn’t elaborate initially. In fairness to the meowling, along with comments about insecurity, she did state something about not finding porn all that attractive or something along those lines, I am of course paraphrasing. I am actually rather fond of the kitten as are most so this was never intended to be an attack upon her person, but you seem rather needful of clarification.
With that in mind I wasn’t going to go into deep details based on assumption. But perhaps she, through her given information might bring some of us to a “logical” conclusion that she might in fact foster feelings of insecurity if he were to find interest in other sluts, she herself says it is her cum (note possessive attitude), as if she possesses it/him; she might also be implying that she should be all he needs, and that in itself might be seen as the intention to impose feelings of guilt upon him.
It bears consideration that it is possible that the very brand of frustration manufactured in this type of commentary will, if he were to succumb to her manipulations and not watch porn because she doesn’t like him doing so might demonstrate he is not man enough or quite possibly not interested enough in her to stand as his own man and dictate to her that he will define how things are going to be. Hopefully you have heard of the concept of mutual pacification, both lying to or appeasing one another just enough to move things along without conflict or effort. I think that’s a liberal thing.
It is nature that would inspire her need to belong to a man; it is nurture that has taught her to mistrust him when he looks at other women as he is naturally predisposed to do and nurture has also taught him to deny his responsibilities as a man, and “master” his everyday duties.
At best, all I see you trying to do here is make an attempt to manipulate the intent within my initial response, I’m only left as to speculate as to why. You might have been met with a greater degree of success in understanding my intentions had you simply asked me to define my intent rather than trying to tell me what I was thinking.
I know, what thrill would there have been in that? After all it might be reasonable to suspect you interjected yourself into the foray for a reason other than just mutual understanding.
I personally don’t dislike porn; I just don’t have time or the inclination to watch it. But it sure as hell isn’t cheating if I were to watch it, cheating requires the intent to deceive or win at something egregiously, in that in this case my pet, it might imply that I was subdued by this western puritanical bullshit that society has produced generating a false idea that porn has so much power that it could corrupt me or my personal relationships.
Holy shit, I hope neither my personal relationships nor my own character are so weak as to give way to such trivial concerns.
In conclusion, you say potato, I say pa’tatto.
|
|
|
|
