RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message

Lockit -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 8:19:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Then you tell men they aren't really men because no man really wants chastity.


Say what? I never said that. You must be getting me confused with somebody else. I did say that I don't think men would put up with a chastity belt for more than a short term kink. I don't even think it's a healthy idea.

Of course there are exceptions to everything, and I'm sure there are men who wear chastity belts. Good luck finding one though.



azjojoba... I am not going to spend my morning trying to pull myself together and prove to you why I have an attitude about some of the things you say and find each thing and prove it.  The following thread alone give's many examples of the outragous things you say.  It was bad enough reading it all the first time... I am damn well not going to do it all again.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_2568011/mpage_9/tm.htm

There is not just one comment or post... but many.

Now... have I never made a mistake?  Oh hell no!  And I will make more in the says to come.  But azjojoba, I want you to think about why it is that so many women do not care for the things you say.  You may not care.  You may believe every word you say and may wish to defend it, but you must see the intelligence of admitting when you are offensive to us as we claim.  How can you claim and consistantly complain about women and dominant women at that, spout facts according to you and your belief's, offend many who dispute them without tempering things?  You continue to say inflamitory things to us and about our gender based mostly on your own experience.

Are you here to enjoy and maybe even have some mild debate or are you here to complain about women and offend or try to inflame?  Whatever is going on, if you were of a mind to get along with us and find some middle ground, we could maybe even respect that you have an opinion, but when you push it in our faces pretty much all the time... dude you look like you have an agenda... a passive aggressive agenda to come slam dunk women every chance you get.



Lockit -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 9:20:28 AM)

The correct link I meant to put and can't seem to edit now is...

http://www.collarchat.com/m_2393678/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm#2416029



azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 2:11:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Are you here to enjoy and maybe even have some mild debate or are you here to complain about women and offend or try to inflame?  Whatever is going on, if you were of a mind to get along with us and find some middle ground, we could maybe even respect that you have an opinion, but when you push it in our faces pretty much all the time... dude you look like you have an agenda... a passive aggressive agenda to come slam dunk women every chance you get.


I thought we were having a mild debate. I am sorry you took it so personally. So, what is a passive aggressive agenda? I haven't heard of that one before.



Lockit -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 2:22:13 PM)

I really don't take it personally.  I am just tired of hearing your complaint's and spouting false information in your complaint's.  So we all tried to tell you how you were wrong.  You won't hear it... still coming in complaining and spouting off the insults about women and I decided to call you on it because I was tired of it.  Not upset... tired of it.  Spouting off as you do is a passive aggressive manner.

A debate typically is based on facts... your facts aren't facts, just attitude.

Now.. I am done.  I will not continue to carry on with you.  I have said all I have to say at the moment.




beeble -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:15:45 PM)

[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]

Is there any actual point in arguing with azjojoba about all this?  Can't we just take it as read that, when he says `all men', he means himself and when he says that no women/Dommes/whatever want sex, he means that no women/Dommes/whatever want sex with him?

beeble.



LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:17:40 PM)

Thank you, Beeble.



PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:27:49 PM)

Indeed.  Frankly, I'm getting a bit bloody tired of a man speaking for 'men in general'.  The men that differ on his opinions on what 'all men feel' are not lying in order to get into women's pants, or for any other reason.  This stuff is beginning to grind on my arse.



LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:44:47 PM)

Peon, do not talk about grinding on your arse, in the mood I am in, I could just grab my passport and... well...



PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:50:19 PM)

 . . . Buy some sandpaper?



LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:53:25 PM)

I am a woman sans Hitachi, dude!  But I got LOTS of sandpaper and some portable power tools...



azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 3:58:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: beeble

[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]

Is there any actual point in arguing with azjojoba about all this?  Can't we just take it as read that, when he says `all men', he means himself and when he says that no women/Dommes/whatever want sex, he means that no women/Dommes/whatever want sex with him?

beeble.



What pisses me off is people like you that continue to say that I write "all men" or "all women". I have done no such thing. You then use these misquotes to cut me down.

It's rather odd that those of you who misquote me are also the ones that accuse me of lacking ethics. Don't you think lying constitutes a lack of ethics?

Maybe some of you aren't lying. You just read somebody elses lies and then you repeat them. Or maybe some of you just have lousy reading and comprehension skills.

JUST FOR THE RECORD FOLKS, I DON'T CLAIM TO BE A SPOKESPERSON FOR ALL MEN OR ALL WOMEN. I do claim to have my own opinions of things and I'm not going to beat around the bush or kowtow just because some of you don't like what I say. I do have common sense and experience, so I'm damned sure I know how most men or most women are. If you want to dwell on the very rare exception fine, but I'm not impressed by that type of psuedo-intellectualism.

Maybe I'm exhibiting passive aggression again. Should I apologize for it?



LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:00:35 PM)

When you say that postmenopausal women are not into sex, do you call that a generalization, or not?  And when you said that dominant women don't like to have sex?  At least own your own words.



azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:21:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

When you say that postmenopausal women are not into sex, do you call that a generalization, or not?  And when you said that dominant women don't like to have sex?  At least own your own words.


Hibby -- I never said anything like what you said. Again these are malicious misquotes. I don't doubt somebody else will read your comment, and not read my rebuttal, and then they will also said I wrote those things. It's like an endless cycle of mistruth.

I'm surprised at the amount of flak I'm receiving over my postmenopausal statement considering I never said that. Just for the record here is what I said, and the links to it. Maybe it's my writing style, but explain to me how what I wrote has anything whatsoever to do with what you said I wrote. Personally I just don't get it.

http://www.collarchat.com/m.asp?m=2554549&mpage=11&key=post%2Cmenopausal
"Yes, most women by the time they pass menopause have no interest in getting laid. Fortunately there are exceptions, but they are hard to find."

http://www.collarchat.com/m.asp?m=2578806&mpage=9&key=dominant%2Cwomen%2Csex
"OK, babe, I just haven't seen the dommes that want to fuck, but every one I have been with wants sex of some other kind."



PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:29:33 PM)

You said that men that say they can turn down sex are just liars.  This was a generalisation and it doesn't apply to me.  It would imply that I'm promiscuous.  I'm not and I get very angry at that charge.




beeble -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:29:48 PM)

quote:

LadyHibiscus wrote: When you say that postmenopausal women are not into sex, do you call that a generalization, or not?
azjojoba wrote: Hibby -- I never said anything like what you said. Again these are malicious misquotes. I don't doubt somebody else will read your comment, and not read my rebuttal, and then they will also said I wrote those things. It's like an endless cycle of mistruth. [...]

OK, so let's get this absolutely clear.  You deny that you wrote that post-menopausal women are not into sex.  You further deny that you ever said anything even like it.  Well, these forums have a reasonable search system so you'd better be pretty sure about that.  'Cos, you know, if you had ever said something like that, somebody will find it.  And that would be pretty embarrassing.

quote:

azjojoba wrote: http://www.collarchat.com/m.asp?m=2554549&mpage=11&key=post%2Cmenopausal
"Yes, most women by the time they pass menopause have no interest in getting laid. Fortunately there are exceptions, but they are hard to find."

Dude, you just nuked yourself in the foot.  That's gotta hurt.

beeble.

[edited to fix quoting]



Lockit -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:35:15 PM)

LOL... Now you all understand why I... [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif] and ended up calling an end to it.  I said all I wanted to say, but I am telling you... I had to get that said.  Even if it was a bit of a repeat... okay... sickenly repeated.

Forgive me?



PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:37:19 PM)

It's all your fault, Lockit.  You're a troublemaker.



ShaktiSama -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:38:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: beeble

Is there any actual point in arguing with azjojoba about all this?


Perhaps not, but sadists often do cruel and pointless things.

I will admit, of course, that there is certainly no punishment that can be inflicted on azjojoba any worse than the life sentence he is already serving.  He's the poster child for instant karma.



PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:56:34 PM)

[;)]



Lockit -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/26/2009 4:58:57 PM)

Peon you will think troublemaker for sure when I offer up some handy dandy alcohol spray for your sanded ass! [;)]



Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875