RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/21/2009 8:00:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama
Making a man blush isn't necessarily sadistic.  Blushing is a sign of vulnerability, which is a very sexy quality.
Not necessarily sadistic at all, and yes, a certain amount of vulnerability is very sexy.

I used to speak with a guy in England, not peon, but loving the English non-accent (lol), I wasn't opposed to calling him and talking with him once in a while.   He was also a bit timid, and certainly never considered anally insertable things.   So I used to chat with him while he was on cam, and would find some toys I've used before, show them to him on the websites, and he would be scared to death I might ask him to use it....   Made me very hott, I have to admit.    M




LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/21/2009 8:01:05 PM)

I love men who blush. 




LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 12:00:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Maybe it's about time I explained something, LP. 

I haven't, it's true, had more than a smidgeon of experience at D/s relationships, in any real sense of that word 'relationships'.  I have, however, been to quite a few BDSM venues and had many and interesting experiences therein.  I've been thrashed numerous times.  I've performed BJs and received them from both women and men.  On request, I've played at 'top' many times and once a woman brought herself off by rubbing herself on my knee.  One time I had two women sucking on my cock while the husband of one of them had his mouth on my ass.  And if you saw me in that bit of sackcloth I wear at BDSM clubs (which, rolled up, fits easily into a trouser pocket), you'd know that a kilt would look a little on the staid side for me.  Groping under said sackcloth (or a kilt, which I've also worn on occasion)?  Noooooo problem. 

I do get embarrassed  - sometimes horribly so - by some of the things that are said to me, or about me, here.  Not by sexual things, though.  But I'm never, ever going to say what those blush-inducing things are.  In my experience women - kinky or straight - just absolutely love embarrassing men if they possibly can.  As I'm sure I've mentioned before: I'm hopeless in many and varied ways, but I'm not bloody stupid.  [;)]


Maybe it's time I gave you a proper response, Peon.

I have no doubt that you've had some wonderful sexual adventures.  I'm even going to thank you for the lovely visual that you provided by the mental image that was inspired by you explaining the same.  I'm sure your nights to the clubs have been fantastic experiences.  For a sadist like Me, the thought of that pretty back of yours with the after effects of those play times making the skin look more, shall we say, colorful........

What I said about you blushing had nothing to do with trying to negate those things that you have already done.  In fact, it wasn't the idea of sex, or play that made Me believe you would blush.  It was something else entirely.

Rather, what would bring that color to the cheeks on your face, would be the attention of four or five Dominant women, all focused on you at the same time.  If you ever got the real life equivalent to what you experience on these boards from time to time, you'd have something that, in a modest estimate, hundred of thousands of submissive males, wouldn't even dare to dream.  Even the most creative couldn't come up with the fantasy that would await you.

I know you're not stupid, dear.  I never claimed you to be.  Though I will ask you if you've ever been privy to what happens when a number of Dominant women are brought together?  I think you'd be amazed.  The energy that feeds one to the other.  Heaven help the poor boy who would be the focus of our attention.  The poor soul who would offer his spirit and flesh.  Have you ever thought of what it would be to be that boy?

I've said too much.




PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 4:36:06 AM)

I've said too much.

No you haven't.  OK, I'll admit to blushing, but it's worth it for the ability I seem to have just acquired - that of being able to walk with my feet a few inches off the ground.





LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 5:27:29 AM)

You didn't have to admit it, dear.  I already knew.




PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 4:49:58 PM)

It doesn't always work to pretend that one hasn't seen a particular post, does it?




LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 5:08:28 PM)

No, I'm afraid it doesn't.

But now you have your happy little mental image and I have Mine.






PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 5:24:57 PM)

True, and as I said, the blush was worth it. [:)]




LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 5:28:04 PM)

Yes, but don't think it gets you out of sending Me that other photo that has been discussed on other threads.  




PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 6:42:54 PM)

That undeniably tasteful and artistic photo is already on my hard disc, LP, and a copy shall be yours as soon as I get my pc back from the police.




LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/22/2009 6:50:20 PM)

If you weren't so damn funny, Peon, the idea of said photo would probably excite Me.




azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/23/2009 1:22:27 AM)

You are definitely right -- femdom isn't represented in porn. 




azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/23/2009 1:28:58 AM)

For some reason fucking has always been perceived as a male dominant activity. Beats me why.

It does seem to more female dominant if she is the one on top when fucking because then she is in control.




LadyPact -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/23/2009 6:40:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

It does seem to more female dominant if she is the one on top when fucking because then she is in control.



Sorry, but as this thread has helped to show, the position of the act has nothing to do with who's in control.  If it's sex (of any variety) with My sub, I can promise you that it's Me.




ElanSubdued -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/23/2009 11:29:51 PM)

Shakti,

quote:

The problem seems to be most common in men who haven't chosen submission after exploring other options, like going through a vanilla or male dominant phase.  I distinctly remember one guy who posted to this forum just a few weeks ago, actually -- from Ireland, I think.  He identified himself as "pure DS" because he couldn't keep his erection when his domme wanted intercourse; vaginal intercourse wasn't submissive in his mind and thus didn't make him hard/get him off.

Personally, I think women who enjoy intercourse might want to look at submissives who have dom or vanilla life experience under their belts more seriously.  Many dommes seem to look at this as a negative, but I think there might be a few advantages to the man who came to his submissive nature by the road less traveled...?  [:D] (Elan, you out there?)

(snip to next post)

Anyway, obviously these guys who don't "put out" do have their appropriate female counterparts.  I'm just not one of them.


I'm not sure what you're asking of me here.  Therefore, I'll try to stay generally on-topic by adding a bit on my background and my thoughts on why I enjoy penetrating dominant, female partners.

When I started having BDSM-ish ideas at a young age, they were from the vantage point of a submissive.  For reasons I won't go into, I've tried my hand in the roles of owner, dominant, top, switch, bottom, submissive, and slave.  I'm most comfortable as a submissive leaning towards slave, but I also find the dynamics I share with a given partner are entirely unique.  In other words, it may be more natural for me to slip into a deep, slavish headspace with one partner whereas another may inspire me to a more median or (*shock*) dominant headspace.

I've finally arrived at a place where my dominant sensibilities rest comfortably inside my more natural, submissive psyche.  Thus, I can call on these skills if needed, but they are not a burning desire or something that must be exercised.  As a submissive, I don't have to work at the mindset because following my partner's leadership and pleasing my partner all feel natural to me.  As a dominant, I do have to work quite hard at being in this headspace - it's not a natural place for me.  That said, when I'm in dom space, I can be very dominant and sadistic indeed.

At any rate, that's enough discussion about submissive versus dominant headspaces.  Let's get to the fucking! :-)

Personally, I don't view penetration or any other sexual acts as inherently dominant or submisive.  Sex is simply one of many activities my domme and I enjoy sharing.  This might sound like a very simple viewpoint, but that's the extent of it.  Okay.  I'll extend this a tad.  I'm a firm believer that fucking isn't a passive activity.  (The puns just keep slipping right in. :-)  Really, I feel the same way about submission - it's not passive.  Now there are submissives who take a very passive stance at all times, but this certainly isn't my own approach.  I like to  enrich and pleasure my partner in many ways and this involves a balance of active, passive, preemptive, initiating, and reactive behaviours, all of which occur organically in response to reading her cues.

When it comes to sex, even though the when, what, and how are usually determined by my domme, the same organic dance occurs and I'll react and initiate based on reading her verbal and non-verbal cues.  I immensely enjoy watching my partner enjoy herself so, based on her mood, this could mean following her very specific instructions;  caressing, kissing, grabbing, rubbing, and playing back and forth in a delicious sex-game of "call and answer";  grabbing her hips, thrusting into her, and hard-fucking till her eyes roll back;  softly kissing and caressing as we mutually pull into one another;  and many other variations (some that include fucking and others that don't).

In terms of sex (or anything else for that matter), I tend to think a domme enjoys herself and her partner(s) however she wishes.  Whatever expectations society has don't figure into this equation unless those ideals are important to the domme.  For myself, when I'm sexually involved, my mindset to give my partner affection and pleasure in whatever way she enjoys.

I'm not sure if the many BDSM roads I've traveled (and that ultimately led me back to submission) have shaped my attitudes towards sex and penetration.  My experiences have most certainly caused me to take a very humanist approach in BDSM relationships.  With this in mind, I do think there is a level of communication that transcends BDSM and yet simultaneously is the very foundation and essence of BDSM.  More than anything, it's my understanding of the importance of and the need for this kind of foundation that has grown considerably as a result of the paths I've taken.

Elan.




ShaktiSama -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/24/2009 9:43:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued
I'm not sure what you're asking of me here.


[:D]  Just the perspective of a submissive man who's been around the track in many roles and who is subsequently smashing in the sackeroo.




azjojoba -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/24/2009 5:54:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

It does seem to more female dominant if she is the one on top when fucking because then she is in control.



Sorry, but as this thread has helped to show, the position of the act has nothing to do with who's in control.  If it's sex (of any variety) with My sub, I can promise you that it's Me.



I haven't seen much consensus on this one. I'll bet most people would agree that female dominant fucking is when the female is on top.






Venatrix -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/24/2009 7:20:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

It does seem to more female dominant if she is the one on top when fucking because then she is in control.



Sorry, but as this thread has helped to show, the position of the act has nothing to do with who's in control.  If it's sex (of any variety) with My sub, I can promise you that it's Me.



I haven't seen much consensus on this one. I'll bet most people would agree that female dominant fucking is when the female is on top.



If I'm having sex with someone, I'm in control, regardless of which position I pick.  You really need to work on getting these silly ideas out of your head.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/24/2009 7:21:47 PM)

I know there's an aphorism that means "not happening"... all I can come up with is the silk purse/sow's ear one!




PeonForHer -> RE: male fukking female as domming but f to m?? (4/24/2009 7:40:44 PM)

V, I think Azjojoba might well be right when he says that 'most people would agree that female dominant fucking is when the female is on top'.   He's incorrect, though, to assume that what most people agree upon is what matters.  It's how this can be seen, not how it commonly is seen, that's important.  What I don't get is why people go along with a majority opinion just because it is the majority opinion.  It's illogical.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875