DavanKael
Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/6/2007 Status: offline
|
Hi, QuixoticErrant, I hope you are doing well. I've known folks who have converted only because it was a demand of their partner's religion/culture (Which are sometimes massively intertwined). Matters of faith can be biggies, especially if folks are planning to procreate. My ex- was an atheist. Moderately rabid about it and his disdain of people who believe in God(s). I'm an agnostic who is relatively spiritual but leans toward atheism (With the exception of the perception that we're all god which some would view as blasphemy but I view with sanctity < shrug >). I knew that if I suddenly decided to become some religion, that would have posed a problem. Although, once when we talked about kids in a pressured situation, he said something to the effect of we should a kid to church. My response: what are you talking about Mr. Atheist and what church/place of worship would you propose?! He was being reactionary based on the premise that that would be the 'easiest' way to instill a moral code. He was maybe 23, 24 at the time and across the years, he realized that was a kooky position he took. What partners believe and how important that is to them is something that is always of concern for me. I'm pretty live-and-let-live as long as no one's cramming something down my throat. There are aspects of just about all religions/faiths/spiritual paths with which I resonate and in which I can find good. If conversion was a necessity, I'd have a sit-down with my partner who would hopefully know me well enough by that point to know that if I were to convert, a good portion of whatever thatentailed would be lip-service to the dogma and an action of conversionout of love and respect for them. My line in the sand is children. Won't indoctrinate. When I was younger and more reactionary, I argued with my ex- about raising a kid a vegetarian. I'm a veggie and have been for over 20 years. My rationale is a rather spiritual one. My ex- disagreed and we had a stalemate for several years. We never had any kids. I came to realize that my dogmatism on the vegetarian thing was similar to someone being dogmatic on a religious piece. Thus, I realized that it would be preferrable to go with what is natural. My interpretation of natural in each of these instances is as follows: on religion, I believe we seek naturally. If I had a child, I would support that seeking and share any knowledge I have. On vegetarianism: we're naturally omnivorous and I would not alter a child's natural inclinations there either. The child would know I am a veggie and if they wanted to make that choice, groovy, if not, groovy also. Some religions require body modification rituals for children, particularly genital ones. There's the place where all of my tolerance goes away and I am utterly inflexible. Body modification that is not the choice of the person being modified is a no-no and someone trying to dothat to my kid would need to watch out for their own safety. That'd be a deal-breaker in terms of partnership, whatever. Sooooo, I've just gone on at length about my beliefs about the things your friend is deliberating. Your friend needs to figure out where she is on such things and where she's willing to bend and where not. I love the romantic notion of love can conquer all and I fundamentally believe it in ways but I've lived enough to know that love does not always conquer all and on something as fundamental as faith/spirituality/culture, that's something that's gonna blow a situation up if people have fundamental, inflexible differences. It might suck to walk away but if it's not something that can be worked out, better sooner than later. Better grown-ups make the grown-up choice before any innocents become involved. Best wishes, Davan
_____________________________
May you live as long as you wish & love as long as you live -Robert A Heinlein It's about the person & the bond,not the bondage -Me Waiting is 170NZ (Aka:Sex God Du Jour) pts Jesus,I've ALWAYS been a deviant -Leadership527,Jeff
|