NorthernGent
Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cpK69 I don’t know I’m beginning to think the idea is a cop-out; an excuse to not have to look into the feelings that inspire action. I guess I just have a hard time understanding how to determine what would be, human nature; knowing how much outside influences affect each individual, and that each responds according to their perception and personality. Maybe it’s just that the idea, to me, appears to overlook the resilience of many, to overcome. Kim Human nature, a soul etc are simply too abstract to pin down, and to my knowledge no one has been able to apply science to human behaviour to understand the mechanics and springs of the mind. All we can do is watch how people actually act and the activating forces that generate this action - human institutions, poetry, language, crime etc - to understand what we are. Ideas of fate, destiny, human nature are of the same ilk: they provide comfort when the wrong decisions are made; you're in a joint venture with some abstract notion that takes a share of the blame when the risks materialise. I mean, when things go right do people say it's human nature or the individual's doing? In terms of perception and personality, I really do believe that personal experiences shape the individual's view of the world; many views but one world. Take someone like Nietzsche. He lived in isolation for 10 years, a brilliant philosopher, totally withdrew into himself, a failure in love, the crux of his philosophy was/is: "do it for yourself", he was vehemently anti-Christianity and Christian principles, his relationships fell apart over one thing or another. His ideas are only meaningful when placed in the context of his childhood: his father was a pastor who died when Nietzsche was young, and this painful experience set in motion a trend of being withdrawn, isolated and looking for answers to explain his predicament (Christianity was a convenient scapegoat, which is ironic considering he was the ultimate "do it for yourself" philosopher). You will find much of the same in all of the great philosphers - Locke, Hobbes, Heidegger, Machiavelli, Sartre. It would be inaccurate to say that we do not share certain characteristics - the evidence is all around us. We have the capacity for mutual co-operation, war, compassion, envy etc. Yet this doesn't mean we can't channel our postives and control our negatives to get as much as we can out of our lives.
_____________________________
I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits. Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.
|