Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

one possible theory


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> one possible theory Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
one possible theory - 5/3/2009 12:44:47 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline
Dommes are no different from other women when you actually stop and think about it, because they are women. Yes they do like the man to be submissive, but they want the submission on tap on their terms. There's also that need for companionship and to step up to the plate when need be.

Very few women are prepared to love a man who is 100% submissive. It would appear that no man is able to be 100% submissive without having other issues. Submission isn't all about sex and it's got nothing to do with weakness. My advice to male submissives would be to show more of who you are as a person, what you are successful at, the dommes will love you for it.

This is a possible theory borne out of observations. Maybe I need to get out more. Your views welcome.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 12:50:54 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Being submissive to me is far different than submissive in all things in life and to all people.  If a man cannot be strong in the outside world... be strong when I need him to be strong... according to my leadership, then what good will his kinky submission be to me if he fails to make the grade of life in general?

_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 12:54:16 PM   
Venatrix


Posts: 2238
Joined: 11/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

Yes they do like the man to be submissive, but they want the submission on tap on their terms.


Stella, have I ever told you how much I love you?

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 1:15:32 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
My advice to male submissives would be to show more of who you are as a person, what you are successful at . . .
 
My feeling exactly.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 1:19:16 PM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
Nope Stella, I agree with you completely.  We need to be in the moment, what is required for that moment.   And it will vary.

I get pretty long stretches of time with my Lady and it can be really wonderful to get to that place where you -feel- totally submissive...but I am still myself and acting from what I think is a place of strength even in those moments.  :)

_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 1:34:54 PM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b
Very few women are prepared to love a man who is 100% submissive. It would appear that no man is able to be 100% submissive without having other issues.


Honestly, I think the core of any problems between potential partners is in defining these terms.

What does it mean to be "submissive", in general?  What does it mean to be "100% submissive"?

Does being "100% submissive" mean that you do not work outside the household or contribute economically, even to the extent of paying for your share of the rent, bills and food?  If so, you may find it hard to find a female dominant partner--not because a woman is incapable of enjoying the fantasy of keeping a sexy houseboy or a leather-clad gimp caged in the basement, but because very few women are economically capable of supporting an additional adult male in their households, along with themselves and whatever children they have, in addition to obligations they may have to elderly parents etc..

Female dominants are part of the economic demographics for our gender:  on the average women are subjected to greater rates of poverty than men and are paid 80 cents on the dollar relative to men.  Finding a woman who is completely free of economic concerns is very hard, and those that are independently wealthy or successful in a lucrative profession tend to be fairly selective about their boytoys--they can afford to be.

Does being "100% submissive" mean that you can't perform sexually as anything but a bottom, that you're incapable of vaginal intercourse or of providing your domme with any service other than bending over or being a post upon which to sharpen her claws?  If so, you may find it difficult to find a monogamous relationship with a domme, because we are also part of the demographic for heterosexual women:  most heterosexual women have physical and emotional needs for intercourse with men.  Women who don't have sex with their submissives are usually having sex with someone else.

Does being "100% submissive" mean that you have no original thoughts or opinions, no desires and fantasies, no hopes, dreams or ambitions, other than to find a woman who will tell you what to do and kick you around a bit?  If so, you may find it difficult to find a female dominant partner, because female dominants, like other other women, are usually looking for relationships with people, not puppets.  A bit of conversation and initiative is appreciated in a person that you spend a lot of time with; if you aren't going to get that from a man, you might as well get a large breed dog instead--they're easier to train and cheaper to feed.

I suppose the last question is:  does being "100% submissive" mean that you are a complete failure in the "game of life"?  No career or career plans, unable to hold down a job or drive a car, having no marketable skills, no social skills,  no education, no athletic or combat ability, no artistic ability, no sense of humor, no sense of beauty, etc.?  Are you attracted to the idea of submission to a woman because you are looking for someone to "fix you", to overhaul your body, your mind and your soul, to give your life direction, to make you "somebody"?

If so, this is a problem as well.  Sometimes I find it difficult to sort out the place where the kinky need for humiliation play ends, a genuine lack of self-esteem or more serious emotional problems begin.  All I can say is that even if a man needs to be told, in the course of D/S scenes and play, that he is a worthless pig-whore-slutpuppy-man-thing who has no purpose to his existence other than lick spunk off the kitchen floor?  That needs to be something other than the truth in real life.

Honestly, I think many men would meet with greater success if they were able to tell a woman:  "I am a successful person and I am quite good at my job and many things, really.  I just want to feel small and diminished, dominated and maybe even a little dehumanized occasionally...by a special woman in a special relationship."





_____________________________

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 2:04:04 PM   
Lashra


Posts: 4900
Joined: 2/9/2006
Status: offline
I am Dominant and I have a lot of masculine qualities about me. My sub has the theory
that because of them it has helped to form my Dominant personality. Whether that is true or not, I do not know honestly.

I do know that finding someone who is 100% submissive (regardless of gender) is a difficult find and yes many (not all)of them have had some sort of life experience that has helped mold them that way.

Personally I like a strong submissive male....read that as saying "submissive to ME". I do not want someone who goes around being submissive to just anyone that he meets. I do not know many women or men who would want a sub/slave like that.

~Lashra


_____________________________

“We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only their own pain and renunciation. It's one thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it's another to think that yours is the only path.”






(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: one possible theory - 5/3/2009 3:43:34 PM   
chamberqueen


Posts: 1597
Joined: 10/25/2007
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Status: offline
Stella, this is also true of female submissives.  No person is likely to act submissively around the clock.  There are times in the relationship that the submissive may be called on to show incredible strength, have to make decisions quickly with little to no input, and act more like they are in charge than as if they are following someone else's lead.  The situation that especially comes to my mind is of subs taking care of a dying Master.  It is the blending of those skills that make a person a delightful whole.


_____________________________



(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: one possible theory - 5/4/2009 5:22:28 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Stella, you hit the nail on the head!

A guy being submissive all the time, I'd freak out! BDSM is only part of my life, not EVERYTHING, how could I have a discussion about anything if it would just want me to tell him what to think.

One of the worst experiences ever was with somebody who was always kneeling, I'm certainly not timid, if I want a guy to kneel he'll know it without me saying so, but somebody always dropping on his knees, it bugged the hell out of me. Not to mention that I have the habit of rushing around a bit, so after falling over him a few times because he knelt in my way, I told him to stop doing it, he started bowing, and you can possibly guess it, me rushing from my desk to the kitchen because I wanted to look into the fridge myself and see what I'd fancy, he bows, I can't stop in time and his head connected with my solar plexus. That guy was just too submissive, whenever you asked him something you got a "As you wish..." I gave up because it felt like dealing with a none too bright child, no intellectual stimulation, in the end I didn't even want to play with him because it soured everything. A little bit of "normality" can sometimes go a long way.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to chamberqueen)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: one possible theory - 5/4/2009 5:26:31 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
You have a great insight into the dynamic, stella. 

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: one possible theory - 5/4/2009 8:37:13 PM   
AlexandraLynch


Posts: 778
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
I don't want a sub who is weak any more than I would want weakness in a horse I purchased. Part of his skillset IS his strength in harness or under saddle, but also his problem-solving and his intelligence and his personality.

The intoxicating thing about domination is feeling that power, that drive, leashed to your hand, and you don't get that without having a strong sub who is giving willing submission.


_____________________________

I use fastreply. Don't take offence where none is meant.

Just because I'm not a bitch doesn't mean I'm not perfectly capable of making sure you'll be very sorry if you disobey.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 2:42:07 PM   
KoolnSassy


Posts: 65
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

Dommes are no different from other women when you actually stop and think about it, because they are women. Yes they do like the man to be submissive, but they want the submission on tap on their terms. There's also that need for companionship and to step up to the plate when need be.

Very few women are prepared to love a man who is 100% submissive. It would appear that no man is able to be 100% submissive without having other issues. Submission isn't all about sex and it's got nothing to do with weakness. My advice to male submissives would be to show more of who you are as a person, what you are successful at, the dommes will love you for it.

This is a possible theory borne out of observations. Maybe I need to get out more. Your views welcome.


Oh I love this post. If a sub is not adding to My life, My joy, comfort and pleasure than what on earth do I need him for. I have enough responsibility in My life. I think oftentimes submission and bottoming are confused and Dominants are pursued to provide what the so-called sub wants. I try to sniff that out pronto.

_____________________________

If you don't know what you're doing, why do you think I know?

KoolnSassy

(in reply to stella41b)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 4:05:33 PM   
Venatrix


Posts: 2238
Joined: 11/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KoolnSassy

I think oftentimes submission and bottoming are confused and Dominants are pursued to provide what the so-called sub wants. I try to sniff that out pronto.


Yep.  My experience has been that the vast majority of submissive men are deeply submissive only until they have to do something they don't really want to.

(in reply to KoolnSassy)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 4:55:38 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Venatrix

quote:

ORIGINAL: KoolnSassy

I think oftentimes submission and bottoming are confused and Dominants are pursued to provide what the so-called sub wants. I try to sniff that out pronto.


Yep.  My experience has been that the vast majority of submissive men are deeply submissive only until they have to do something they don't really want to.


Are we meeting the same men, V? 

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to Venatrix)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 5:11:24 PM   
Venatrix


Posts: 2238
Joined: 11/28/2007
Status: offline
I'm coming to the conclusion that there are only 15 submissive men on this site, but they have 520,763 profiles with different pictures.

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 5:19:51 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
Actually, they don't all have different pictures... last week I was amusing myself by writing to the guys with dom AND sub profiles with the same pic, and advising them to at least show SOME creativity!

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to Venatrix)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 5:43:21 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

A little bit of "normality" can sometimes go a long way.


Indeed.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 6:32:39 PM   
Kaiel


Posts: 748
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lashra


Personally I like a strong submissive male....read that as saying "submissive to ME". I do not want someone who goes around being submissive to just anyone that he meets. I do not know many women or men who would want a sub/slave like that.

~Lashra



I totally agree! My sub/husband is very strong in the 'outside business" world, but he is submissive to Me and that is what I enjoy!


_____________________________

I keep My expectations and thread counts high- "catitude"

(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: one possible theory - 5/6/2009 6:37:43 PM   
MsFlutter


Posts: 1305
Joined: 11/12/2008
From: East Coast
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Being submissive to me is far different than submissive in all things in life and to all people.  If a man cannot be strong in the outside world... be strong when I need him to be strong... according to my leadership, then what good will his kinky submission be to me if he fails to make the grade of life in general?


what Lockit said !!
 
::this is a recording::

_____________________________

'Dont torture yourself, Gomez darling. That's my job' Morticia Addams

"The right data, filtered through an idiot, can yield a bad answer." einstien5201

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: one possible theory - 5/7/2009 4:52:29 AM   
Drifa


Posts: 547
Joined: 7/27/2007
From: Rural Texas
Status: offline
If I was not strong and thoughtful and opinionated, I think the value of my submission would be less for my Lady. In the overall dynamic we are partners, each with our own strengths and weaknesses.  The overall responsibility and final say are hers, but she values my input.

If I was a spineless pile of mush, there would be no submission.... doormats don't submit, they just lie there and wait to be walked on.

(in reply to MsFlutter)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> one possible theory Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.095