HeavansKeeper
Posts: 1254
Joined: 5/14/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: breatheasone This is not a very easily answered question for me. Anyone have any thoughts? By definition, if it's the "right thing to do" it cannot be wrong. If we sift and weigh all the measures, and reason our way to this solution, then it can't be wrong. It's right. But that could be the vulcan in me. Steel has used, in previous threads, the expression "Captain Save A Ho". The more human side of me reads your question as "When does my dream of social justice no longer warrant itself?" I suggest one's intent for social justice is no longer warranted when it either conflicts with the rights of others. I have a right to make the world a better place. Among many other rights, I also have the right to speak in any public forum, listen to any public discussion, and respond to said statements (an application of the prior right). These are human rights. Included is the right to ignore others, one which often gets invoked when I get preachy in my public forums. Unless you are interfering with their rights to life, liberty, property, or privacy, there is no limit to when it's "wrong." It may cause people to resent you, it may make them think you're a nosy twit... (They have the right to think so). If you're concerned with "When will people think I'm a nosy twit for trying to help?" the answer varies. Some people get very defensive on the outset of any attempted aid. Others will never think less of you for trying. That's why I don't like people, they're so inconsistent about important things like what will set them off when people try to help.
_____________________________
The Loving Owner of HisHeavan ... You've waited your whole life for this moment...
|