Whenready
Posts: 319
Joined: 3/5/2009 Status: offline
|
Polyana: During a discussion with a friend about safe words she said several things which alarmed me. OK. Reasonable to be concerned about your friend. She states that she does not need a safe word because shes not enough of a pain slut to need one, she's not even a masso. As has been seen above, opinions are divided. Personally, I have required My subs to have a safe word. I'm good (and SOOOO modest), I'm in control, but I can make a mistake just like anyone else. I am I believe good at reading people, but I'm not perfect. Emotional pain tends, I think, to be much more damaging than physical pain. A safe word can help avoid that risk. She thinks that her Sir should accept all the responsibility and know when to stop play by reading her. She cannot comprehend that it is a joint responsibility and that by having a safe word which her sir wishes her to have, it is just that extra bit of safety. The relationship is quite new, they have only played together about three or four times. It is My responsibility. Especially if (for example) she is tied & gagged. (In that case, I have a drop ball, but that's My choice, as per My view above). She can't physically stop Me, Therefore it IS My responsibility. You go on to say: ...he has stated that he may not be fully in control during play what is she doing? What are either of you doing playing with a Dom who cannot control himself? That decision is her responsibility - and yours in your own case. She feels that by accepting use of a safe word she is giving her Sir free licence to 'thrash' her and not build up her pain slut training slowly. Possible. Never heard of talking to each other about wants and needs? Communication, communication, communication.... She is assuming he will ignore the knowledge of her pain limits at present and just go hell for leather. Also possible. Assumptions are however always dangerous and often wrong. But only for the purpose of argument here, let's say He IS going to go hell for leather, and doesn't have self control. If she thinks that, why is she consenting to play in the first place? Why is she (are you) in the relationship, and, if He has no control, is He going to listen to a stop word anyway? She also feels that if she accepts having a safe word it automatically equates to her Sir not bothering to monitor her or learn to read her etc. As above, it could equate to that. It doesn't have to. Now personally i'm not a safe word girl but not for any of the reasons above. So you want her to do as you say but not as you do. I bet that's a convincing argument. The reasons become rather irrelevant in that context. I find the reasons above kind of worrying. As the thread has grown, are you worrying enough? And for the right people? Any thoughts? See above. I wasn't going to mention this as i didn't feel it relevant at the time of writing this thread but i'm not an outsider. We are a triad. I laughed when I read this. No, I'm sure the fact that she's not in fact "just" a friend but is part of YOUR triad (you appear to have no profile, so I am guessing that you too are submissive, with all the inherent possibilities for error that that entails) makes no difference at all. I am quite sure that your "help" for someone interacting with your Dom is not interfering in any way. "Interfering" is if anything, rather kindly put.
|