RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


DavanKael -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/12/2009 9:47:21 PM)

I think your project was a cool one and being somewhat mathematically-minded, I can understand why you'd have fun working on it. 
I would think that there are lots of 'cougars' (I think a lot of people play fast and loose with that term) out there looking for a 20-something boy.  'Course, I imagine some would discount someone in their 20's as lacking in direction, commitment, etc. which isn't necessarily indicative of all folks in their 20's, not by a long-shot. 
If you'd spoken with any ladies further than them saying "you're too young", what have their reasons accompanying that assertion been? 
Best wishes, 
  Davan




azjojoba -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/12/2009 10:42:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VelvetCruelty

So, I'm a rare breed? [:D] lmao............

Geeks are kind of hot even if they are a little misguided!


You are indeed a rare breed, which is quite unfortunate!




slavekal -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 5:07:08 AM)

There are probably a lot of young dominant women out there who are not on fetish sites.  Some are in the clubs and bars.  Just have to chat them up to find out if they are interested in our life.




gumshoe -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 5:22:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus


While I find your geek statistics project enchanting, wouldn't your time have been better spent looking for women who SPECIFY that they are interested in younger men? 


I don't know, he's got everyone's attention hasn't he.
This is better way of getting noticed than standing naked outside a shopping mall letting off a shotgun.

EDITED TO ADD:

Who cares about the fidelity of the data. What a smart way to get noticed. I wish I had thought of this myself.




LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 7:49:10 AM)

are we having a hollywood moment here cause it sure feels like it    




antipode -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 7:55:48 AM)

quote:

Ok so sometimes I'm a nerd


Sometimes only? [:D]




constriction -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 8:26:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subsubtle

But still it was a fun little experiment and gave me a bit more hope that maybe there is a Domme close to my age out there for me.

I think that's a key point. At that age, most women who realize their power will not need to waste their time dealing with the drivel they'll get on an online site. Of course there are exceptions, but I imagine those exceptions are mostly not what you are seeking.

Around 2000, I wrote some web archiving scripts and pointed them at a large commercial bdsm personals site. Each day, they'd snapshot all the data returned by the browse function for each geographic area and put it into a database. That was when the site was mostly free (and a different era), so the data quality was pretty good.

It was interesting to see how the ratios of M, F, TG, Gay, domme, sub, switch, etc, varied over time and by geographic location. The ratios, in particular, are very telling. For my geographic search area, it archived detailed profile info and would show when 'fresh meat' appeared on the site. Fun stuff for demographically inclined geeks. It was also very apparent when large numbers of fake profiles would be added to the system. I think that is fraud if done by a pay site (and quantifying that was part of my motivation), but gotta inflate those membership totals...

The age data you have shared are interesting. I'd be interesting to see how it varies by location. I think there are some "sweet spots" that are popular for fake profiles (25, 26). And not too many claiming to be 31 or 32, because, you know, don't trust anyone over 30! :)




SlaveBlutarsky -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 1:55:45 PM)

lol, now THAT's a nerd




Prinsexx -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 2:21:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subsubtle


I also graphed my results here:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v50/fersslav/AgeofDommes-1.jpg?t=1242171882




oh sorry but this site really is good entertainment




kimba1 -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 2:30:01 PM)

hmmm, are you sure the big spike wasn't at 39? winks [;)]




WarKirby -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 2:56:32 PM)

I get a lot of generic, unspecific messages from dommes in those cities, usually around age 25.
They seem oddly eager to give me their email address in the first message, despite the fact that I'm 5000 km away, and looking for submissives, not a domme.

Perhaps there's a higher proportion of fakes in there than you might expect.

I'm also frequently talking to subs who accidentally marked themselves as dommes. Is it the default coice on the form, and they're just forgetting to change, perhaps?




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 2:57:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SlaveBlutarsky

lol, now THAT's a nerd


AND he's local!  [:D]  That's what a Michigan winter will do to you!




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 2:58:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: darklight17

I don't see how figuring the pattern helps you meet "the one" or two, three, four, and so forth. Every woman is different > >


There you go, you and Kal, giving away all the secrets![;)]




constriction -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 3:13:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SlaveBlutarsky

lol, now THAT's a nerd


Now please don't insult me... The term of art is geek.




masmiss -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 3:14:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subsubtle

For a while I've been looking for a significantly older woman to submit to.





Why do you want an older woman to submit to?  I've never had an age limit so I'm curious.




SlaveBlutarsky -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 6:02:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: constriction


quote:

ORIGINAL: SlaveBlutarsky

lol, now THAT's a nerd


Now please don't insult me... The term of art is geek.



My apology, and neither geek nor nerd would be an insult from me. I've always been jealous/impressed by people who are able to program or are math inclined, it's soemthing I've never had the aptitude for. Although I'm taking calc one and two over the summer so maybe that will change.




Lockit -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 6:57:43 PM)

All I want to know is where is this fountain of youth I've heard about.  Because some of these older guys are stuck in the rock ages and think I am here for their amusement.  I see you self professed geeks and nerds and wish for a fountain of youth!  Oh and then for transporters to bring you to my area.  Hey, if I'm going to dream... I might as well dream big!




ShiftedJewel -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 7:11:10 PM)

Hmmm... maybe I'm a little bit of a geek too then. When bored I used to sit with a calculator and try and figure out the square root of a random four digit number. Not using any formulas, just guessing and normally going down to the fifth or sixth decimal.

Oh, and I'm over fifty and far from 99!!

Jewel


edited because I hate typos




Jeptha -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/13/2009 7:38:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kimba1

hmmm, are you sure the big spike wasn't at 39? winks [;)]

That's just about right: the biggest spike was age 25, followed next by 39 (with 21 a close third.)

That was a fun graph - nicely done!




LadyConstanze -> RE: Age analysis - Dominant women (5/14/2009 8:22:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeptha

quote:

ORIGINAL: kimba1

hmmm, are you sure the big spike wasn't at 39? winks [;)]

That's just about right: the biggest spike was age 25, followed next by 39 (with 21 a close third.)

That was a fun graph - nicely done!



Does that mean I should look forward to 40 or be worried that I might run into an age barrier (StarTrek moment here) and disappear into some worm hole that will spit me out into another quadrant where no BDSM exists?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.298828E-02