Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
~FR~ The simple choice of what to cover and which images to use reflects a necessary discrimination among the wealth of potential material, as well as need to attract and keep viewers, who also aren't unbiased. It is, however, true that commentators have missed that they themselves are not the news. Investigative journalists have more cause, as they have an argument in favor of news, and some are recognized as better than their peers. Even then, however, a good journalist is going to report news others don't want to hear, and will be labeled "biased," true or not. The unfortunate truth is that viewers don't want unbiased news...they just want it biased their way, which sources they will then proclaim true and unbiased, evidence be damned. Hell, look at all the posters here who turn to blatantly, openly biased sources and to editorials and blogs, by definition opinion pieces, not reporting, to web pages and youtube to "support" their positions. They're seeking validation, not the truth.
< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 5/24/2009 10:40:14 AM >
|