Focus50 -> RE: a question... (5/30/2009 6:14:20 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Whenever I see that term, it puts me on alert. I have never seen it used except as a manipulative tool to get an inexperienced sub to think that she has to do something she doesn't want to. [sm=agree.gif] Despite Focus's point, that such terms can be meant to explain a certain innate yearning, how it has become used is commonly to put down others for having boundaries the someone else doesn't have, or to get a sub to allow her hard limits to be broken. I've been told I'm not true because I'm not interested in pain play, only rope. And because I'm not bi and not willing to be in a relationship with a man who dips his wick into every possible wax pot. Despite the fact that I submit only to one, and that I turned down countless offers from dominants who I was not compatable with, I am still true. And still in a long term relationship with my one. At the risk of splitting hairs at the atomic level, I think DarkSteven (and a few seconders) have addressed a different question to the OP's. IE, what isn't (or you're not) a true submissive? I don't see an angle of manipulation by calling someone, or yourself, a "true anything". Yep, I can see ego, naivity, sincere intentions or just plain brutal honesty. Just sayin'.... Focus.
|
|
|
|