missturbation
Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006 From: another planet Status: offline
|
I agree there is reasonable doubt however i would ask myself from that statement how the charity had got the info that it was in a bag and not on her person. I can only imagine that it was from the accused herself. If she is claiming innocence she was bound to say they were not on her person.
_____________________________
What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb. If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it. Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!
|