RE: Old Guard? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message

OldBastardly1 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 5:37:07 AM)

Does anybody remember the noise that Charlie Brown's teacher made?



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:13:50 AM)

the dissertation is a small but decent work. but it does not mention old guard once, let alone give any info on it. t

the original post is asking about old guard. why do you have to keep bringing up bdsm?

if you have something to add to the original post request,  i would be most intersted in reading it.

there are threads for bdsm, there is also a thread for ask a mistress.



chellekitty -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:21:00 AM)

the original post was made in 2004, the original poster has not posted in 3 years...i don't believe she is still on these boards looking for an answer to her question...



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:23:55 AM)

so thats means we should deviate from the subject matter?



mnottertail -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:25:27 AM)

means it was old and tired shit then, and it is old and tired shit now, it means no more or less than that.

Ron



chellekitty -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:29:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: masterlink65

so thats means we should deviate from the subject matter?


if you were answering with your own thoughts, ideas, and perhaps even experience on the subject matter i would be more than glad to read them, however, you are plagerizing and have no original thoughts that i have seen thus far, and participating in sadistic necrophiliac bestiality....ie. beating a dead horse...



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:30:47 AM)

nice of you to speak for others



mnottertail -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:33:46 AM)

Yes, it was a clearly stated and consensual caucus.......we got buttons, stationary, a tax exempt ID  and everything.....


Ron



chellekitty -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 8:34:47 AM)

he wasn't speaking for me, he was dumbing down what i said....



Jeffff -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 9:00:57 AM)

He spoke for me..usualy he is funnier..:)

Jeff



Alumbrado -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 9:10:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chellekitty

he wasn't speaking for me, he was dumbing down what i said....
  [sm=biggrin.gif]



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 12:46:59 PM)

iwas talking about you(chellekitty) speaking for her



mnottertail -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 12:48:39 PM)

Well, that didn't clear up a damn thing, sport.

Ron



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:05:26 PM)

more like contempt and disgust, than frustration and anger. others ignorance and lack of insight, makes me sad not angry


this is what i see-
rover
mnottertail;two single men, doms, single no slaves. dom=master, like sub=slave,,,, it doesnt

bitatrouble
kellekitty-domme/mistress?  there are threads for ask a mistress

oldbastardly1; owns a slave, but states very clearly in profile he HATES old guard. so why on this thread other than to argue and raise trouble, and show immaturity.


none of the above mentioned have contributed any knowledge or info about old guard. and has shown are clear disrespect for.


if you look at the top of page 4 of this thread, the first thing i said is,, some info i found.  when i did speak from my previous experince it got ridicule and accusation.

now,,, like i said, if someone has anything of value to contribute to this thread about old guard. i would be more than happy to read it.

plagiarizing, is when you claim it as your own, i made it clear that page 4 was copy/paste, and from another source. a free source, and open to public. look at page 3 and you will see what i have added as my own experinces, but that wasnt good enough, so i found some work done by people involved with old guard. that wasnt good enough either. seems people would rather argue than contribute. if this is so old and worn and no one cares, then how come this thread keep getting added to by people not even interested in old guard?



KatyLied -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:12:42 PM)

quote:

this is what i see-
rover
mnottertail;two single men, doms, single no slaves. dom=master, like sub=slave,,,, it doesnt


What are you trying to say?  That only people in current relationships have an opinion that is worth hearing?  Just because you have slaves at the current time that somehow makes what you have to say more valuable than someone who is not in a relationship?  Furthermore how do you know that Rover and Ottertail aren't in relationships?  Not everyone screams about it in their profiles.



masterlink65 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:19:05 PM)

when a profile says single and looking, i would take it that the person is single and looking.

no my opinion is not more important. i am just stating the fact that this is a thread in a catagory of ask a master. not ask a dom, or ask a domme, or ask a gorean, there are other threads for that. but the fact i do own slaves, and others are merely thinking about would seem to have more substance. but again, people seem to want to argue than be helpful. i have not seen any of this as a healthy arguement contributing to the subject matter.

so yet another addition to the thread but no contribution to the subject matter



mnottertail -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:38:01 PM)

now, your insight fails you......masterlink65 makes you a sixty five year old man looking to link up with a master.....

you are not very good at reading people and you certainly are not worth reading, so looka here......your contribution to any subject matter that would offset the footprint of your oxygen usage is koiannusquatsi.

Where in the fuck do you come up with this outlandish and impudent shit?

Ron



BitaTruble -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:50:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: masterlink65


bitatrouble-domme/mistress?  there are threads for ask a mistress



I'm not a domme or a mistress. You were inconsistant because you're a thief of words. I pointed out your plagerism as a possible reason why people are confused by your inconsistant words and suggested that you give credit where it's due to avoid that in the future.

You could have just said thanks.

For the record, I'm a slave who trained as a Leather bottom with a gay, Leather Daddy from 1982 - 1985 in San Francisco. He was 30 years into the scene back then (and 30+ years my senior and now dead) but I choose not to answer the three year old OP because my experience as a lesbian Leather bottom is unique to my time, location and frame of reference. I started on the bottom, moved to the Top for almost 7 years and went back down to the bottom because it's where I am most comfortable. While I now consider myself bi-sexual, my primary sexual attractions are to other females. My main S/m orientation is for Topping but I am also a heavy masochist, my main M/s orientation is slave. I don't have a domme bone in my body, but I'm a fairly evil sadist. Your labels and ideas don't fit me, so keep them to yourself if you don't mind.

Can I speak to Old Guard? No. I'm not, never was and never can claim to have been Old Guard. Was Master A Old Guard? No, because it didn't exist as Old Guard back then but there are more than a few people who would view him that way 'now,' despite the fact that he was a real son-of-a-bitch who only took me on as property because he pitied me.

Gay, Leather Daddy, ex-military etc. The shoe fits for him and he passed on a pretty extensive education to me in the forms of S/m, boot blacking, service etc .. none of which is some sort of 'standard' Old Guard 'way'. They were just 'his' way and the way of the small circle of other gay men that were frequent visitors to our home in the Bay Area.

So, should I take my experience as being trained by someone who may or may not meet some sort of criteria for OG and say that 'this' is what it means to be OG? You have to know boot blacking or you're not OG. You have to wear chaps or you're not OG. You have to be a gay male or you're not OG. You have to have started as a bottom or you're not OG. You have to be dead or you're not OG.

How silly it all seems and, frankly, beneath me.

Here's another piece of advice for you. Take it or leave it. If you use the 'quote' button, people will know to whom you are speaking when you make a reply. But then, that will probably be viewed as off topic as well.

::shrugs::

Now, this is what I see: 'master'link65 - you have told several people there are various threads for their particular orientations (even when you are wrong in your assumption) so let me tell you the ideal place for your rants and postings .. the forum called Random Stupidity. I think you'll fair much better there and you should leave the historical facts to those who know and can converse on the subject in their own words with some modicum of comprehension to the responses.

Celeste




OldBastardly1 -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:52:58 PM)

missinglink65...my profile says that I have a collared alphasub and am open to adding a quality beta.

Just because I don't whack off while chanting "old guard rules" , does that mean that I am not allowed here to see if anything that hints of having any logical basis might possibly make me think that my opinion was nurtured in error?

If you really hold sacred the Old Guard, do your cause a favor and back away from the keyboard. The more you type, the more you cause harm to the Old Guard's image.

I do believe it is a blessing that some people choose to not procreate.  



mnottertail -> RE: Old Guard? (12/3/2007 1:54:36 PM)

LOL, he could have plagArized the TOS and forum guidelines to indicate the reasonableness of the veracity of his claims about telling some couple hundred thousand people where and what they could post.......

You would think someone looking for information which they do not possess in and of themselves (and that appears to be a great deal in his case) could kinda be appreciative of anything they could learn, even if it doesn't laser into the narrow confines of his droll question.

Ron



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875