Prinsexx
Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I mean no offense to the folks who have posted prior, but as much as I respect many of you, some are too wrapped up in the word "lifestyle" itself. Can't we just allow folks to use the term as related to BDSM being a part of life and move on with it already? I think most of us know what is implied to some degree when the word is used, rather than get off into a debate about semantics. Do we really have to write out long, expressive declarations about wiitwd, kinky, dynamics or can we just use the word so we don't have to go into paragraphs about individual applications? Forgive the mini rant, Prinny. Allow Me to answer your questions. quote:
ORIGINAL: Prinsexx Simple questions to both 'd's and 's's: 1. Have you ever wanted to, thought about leaving the lifestyle? I have. My first M/s relationship was not completely successful. At the time, I thought the failing was My own, rather than seeing that we were just poorly matched. quote:
2. What would make you leave the lifestyle? When My first pairing ended, I felt like I was in the wrong place for Myself, even though I was so drawn to it. I wasn't quite sure that I belonged in the "Old Boys Club" and that was very confusing to Me then. In those days, I hadn't grown enough to see that I was still Me. That took a while. quote:
3. Have you left the lifestyle and then come back into it/ I have. In My personal case, I feel that I was quite fortunate. To be honest, I don't recommend people trying it the way it worked out for Me. Yes, it's possible to convert vanilla partners, but it's also possible to fall flat on your face. Part of where I am today is nothing more than pure luck, and the love of a partner who saw that I needed this. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't suggest that other people take that kind of a gamble. quote:
Or is this not your take on it? It is and it isn't, hon. I didn't construct the way it all turned out. If I had, I probably would have failed miserably. If I had to do it over again, it wouldn't have gone quite this way. Not everyone is going to find that person who is willing to expand their horizons because the person they love isn't having their needs fully met. That's a lot to ask of anyone. Had MP refused to do these things with Me years ago, I'd have understood and gone on with our happy vanilla life. I wouldn't have been unhappy, but I wouldn't have gone further into the potential that I have today. Hindsight in 20/20, it worked out for Me. Not everyone gets that chance. Think about that as you go on in your future endeavors. i love the way you say things so i'm just going to reply and thus get your whole posting printed again in the hope that the folks who missed it the first time might read it again. I ain't getting into semantics either but why do we still have the term lifestyle if it just means life in general. The term sure does mean a great deal to those that are as old as me who have been in the 'lifestyle' when iy bore risks: risks of being ostrasized, risks of being outed, risks of having the kids taken waya bt social services because there were screams in the night, risk of being non-consensually abused, risks of feeling isolated. Risk of being sectioned for craziness. Risk of being imprisoned just for being a man in love with a man. Etc Etc. Codes of conduct, and ethics thoght out and agreed to like any other risky business that fucks with minds and bodies. Ahh well....those were the days. And PS i have to smile. Try being a submissive and telling a dominant vanilla partner what you want from a relationship.
< Message edited by Prinsexx -- 6/18/2009 3:54:37 PM >
_____________________________
Owner of asterion Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged Free woman Resident thread finisher To my stalker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel
|