angelikaJ
Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: darkangel6989 This girl is very confused I can see that. so she decided to write about it and maybe just maybe get some responses. Does this girl also have an open mind? But this girl thinks she might anger some female dominants, hmmm W/we will see. It seems you anticipate that your post might be provoking. Hmmm, what might that mean? Did A/anyone ever notice how female dominates always have a front, the way they present themselves as “big”, their outfits, the leather, the front on how “dominant” they really are. So only male dominants are allowed to wear leather and engage in silly posturing now? Damn it, I must get a new copy of the rule book. It’s like you can’t really get to the core of who they really are.The thing is if you found out who they really were you’d find that females were made to be submissive to males. That is biologically speaking though, not what the world/ society has taught women. Were all of the matriarchal societies wrong? the world has taught women that they must be strong, independent, that being sexually attractive to a male is slutty (in a bad way), that submitting to males is wrong… that males must not show who they really are sexually. Everything about females identifies that she is made to please men. The way her body is made weaker than a male. the way her face is shaped, breasts, the body shape, her ass….. just everything, the way she is made in every way. females are NOT made equal to Males and that is a fact. When you try to prove differently you are grasping at straws that society has taught you not what is actually true biologically and what is truly in female’s human nature. Finally, you are beginning to make sense except you got it a bit backwards. "Whenever women have insisted on absolute equality with men, they have invariably wound up with the dirty end of the stick. What they are and what they can do makes them superior to men, and their proper tactic is to demand special privileges, all the traffic will bear. They should never settle merely for equality. For women, "equality" is a disaster." Robert A. Heinlein A female once finding her true nature and is bound will find true happiness and bliss that she will not find anywhere else, and if she loses her bindings she will chase after them forever. a Male however will always fight those binds and run fast away from them once freed. i hate when people fight their basic human structure. i will never understand women domination and i am not meant to understand it because it is not right. End of story you can try to prove me wrong but you will be sharing with me what society has taught you. And here is where you are wholly wrong *in my own humble opinion*: By insisting that the only true paradigm is one in which all women are submissive to men, you are devaluing my choice to enter into a D/s relationship with my partner. In doing so, your submission to your owner becomes less special. You are also denying the fact that in nature variety exists. (which of course is patently silly) ~lynsie his slave~ I have left aside the fact that the way you presented *your opinion*. Presenting things for discussion is one thing. Being antagonistic is something else. If you truly don't understand the difference then you might want to research emotional intelligence. For your own sake, I hope you try to sort that out. edit to clarify
< Message edited by angelikaJ -- 6/19/2009 3:09:46 PM >
_____________________________
The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies. (as deemed by He who owns me) http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm 30 fluffy points! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg
|