RE: Palin to resign as governor (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 6:55:20 PM)

I put my dead shoes in a woodchipper its the only way to make sure they stay dead....ala revenge of the shoe zombies




DemonKia -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 6:56:41 PM)

To amplify on what you posted, Tazzy . . . . .

Economics is confusing & difficult to understand for economists; for those of us outside the discipline it can be muddy water indeed . . . . . & Inflation & deflation are particularly opaque topics. Deflation, in particular, is both very noxious, & difficult for all of us who've never lived thru significantly deflationary periods to understand. The following article does a rather excellent job of explaining how this has been playing out in recent events (I've excerpted the gist):

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/07/july-5-2009-unbearable-mightiness-of.html

...inflation is an increase in the supply of money and credit relative to available goods and services, while deflation is the opposite.....

...An understanding of the scale of the inflation we have lived through requires far more than looking at CPI or even casting an eye over conventional money supply measures. It is necessary to appreciate the role of credit and the massive scale of a credit expansion that largely took place in the unregulated shadow banking system. Credit is the critical factor, as the 'moneyness' of credit in a myriad different manifestations drove the expansion of the effective money supply....

...one of the drivers of the credit bubble has been the ever-broadening definition of money. As the global economy expanded without a hic-up, more and more instruments came to be used as a store of value or medium of exchange or even a standard against which to value other things—in other words, as money. Thus mortgage-backed bonds and even more exotic things came to be seen as nearly risk-free and infinitely liquid. In Noland's terms, credit gained "moneyness," which sent the effective global money supply through the roof. This in turn allowed the U.S. and its trading partners to keep adding jobs and appearing to grow, despite debt levels that were rising into the stratosphere....

..."We have a credit based economy and anyone watching money supply and not watching credit is simply wrong. This is a statement of fact, not idle conjecture."...

...credit only functions as equivalent to money during the expansionary phase. Once the credit ponzi scheme has reached is maximum extent, the quality of 'moneyness' disappears. As the value of credit collapses, so does a money supply of which credit has come to comprise the vast majority. This is deflation, not the fall of prices, and there is precious little central bankers can do about it other than to play a desperate confidence game, hoping that they can obscure reality long enough for confidence to return by itself....

...”With a few months of hindsight, it's now clear that debt-as-money was not one of humanity's better ideas. When the U.S. housing market -the source of all that mortgage-backed pseudo money- began to tank, hedge funds found out that an asset-backed bond wasn't exactly the same thing as a stack of hundred dollar bills. The global economy then started taking inventory of what it was using as money. And it began crossing things off the list. Subprime ABS? Nope, that's not money. BBB corporate bonds? Nope. High-grade corporates? Alas, no. Credit default swaps? Are you kidding me?

No longer able to function as money, these instruments are being "repriced" (a slick little euphemism for "dumped for whatever anyone will pay"), which is causing a cascade failure of the many business models that depend on infinite liquidity. The effective global money supply is contracting at a double-digit rate, reversing out much of the past decade's growth.”...

...”Although Japan was rapidly printing money, a destruction of credit was happening at a far greater pace. There was an overall contraction of credit in Japan for close to 5 consecutive years. Property values plunged for 18 consecutive years. The stock market plunged from 40,000 to 7,000. Cash was hoarded and the velocity of money collapsed.

These are classic symptoms of deflation that a proper definition incorporating both money supply and credit would readily catch. Those looking at consumer prices or monetary injections by the bank of Japan were far off the mark. Yes, there was deflation in Japan. Furthermore, if deflation can happen in Japan, then there is no reason why it cannot happen in the US as well.”...



I particularly like that they quote Mish, cuz I generally find Mish annoying & frequently 'wrong', & thus when data points converge from very different perspectives, there may be something of substance there, in my book . . . ..

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

How We Get Out of the Great Depression II
By Steven Stoft, March 2, 2009
Here we go again: Hoover got us in, and WWII got us out. Bush got us in, and

to his credit, starting trying to get us out. Though, mostly he threw money at bankers.
In the Great Depression, Roosevelt tried deficit spending, but he was too timid. Then he stopped in 1937 and the economy nose-dived. It took the humongous deficits of WWII to pull us out of the Great Depression. Those deficits blasted the economy from depression into overdrive.


It goes on from there.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:17:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

From where I sit she's doing anything but embarass herself willbeurdaddy.You on the other hand........


surprise surpise surprise. Since youve been shown to play word twisting games yourself, a sycophantic chorus was not unexpected.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:20:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
You havent shown any of my numbers to be wrong. Are you here to embarass yourself like DomKen, who is in hiding after his asinine claims about the money supply going down?

Naughty. Don't make claims that aren't true.

Your claims are based on one source that doesn't source the data or reveal methodology. The facts are all the indicators are contrary to those claims.

You can continue to claim things you can't prove but I'd watch the ad hominen I've been being gentle with you because you're new and I figured Mod XI would take care of you soon enough.



There you go embarassing yourself again. Please, do yourself a favor and read about monetary policy and the Fed, which is the only way money supply can be radically impacted. Changes in asset valuation have NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH MONEY SUPPLY. Your inability to understand that just shows how uneducated you are.

Cant win your own fight so you want a Mod to bali you out? You sound like a little girl.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:23:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

willbeurdaddy gawd your research numbers are as bad as your manners.
CNN was at 67% not 76% in feb...so a six point drop, ....
from CNN TODAY
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/obamas-approval-rating-remains-steady-poll-says/
The 61 percent approval rating is down one point from May and down six points from February. "Since March, Obama's approval rating has gone down one percentage point each month in CNN polls," notes CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "In March it was 64 percent; in April it was 63 percent. Last month his approval rating stood at 62 percent and now it is at 61 percent."
Lucy







http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0709/obamab.html

"The poll, published today by news channel CNN, put President Obama's overall job approval rating at 61%, down from 76% in February."

"The poll, published today by news channel CNN, put President Obama's overall job approval rating at 61%, down from 76% in February."


Your numbers are from 6/29, mine from today. (And the 76% was 2/6-2/8)

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 7/9/2009 6:36:16 PM >


Problems with your links.... the RTE site you posted is an Irish site. Not saying they arent good.. but.. you really should check down your sources before posting.

Second... i went to the CNN site. The CNN site links us back to this site http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

the Rasmussen Report has a graph oh, about half way down... and.. what is this? it DOESNT show Obama's approval ever being 76%. In fact, they dont show it ever being over 50%.

Now, seems obvious to me, they are using a different scale. takes a bit of time to back track all this. bit, amazingly, i get into all this fact checking.





Then you might try fact checking at CNN itself or the Real Clear history that was linked before. 76% 2/7 to 2/8. I won't hold my breath for your apology despite the fact that you havent shown me wrong on anything.

Democracy Corps (D) 2/9 - 2/10 1000 LV 58 27 +31 
Ipsos/McClatchy 2/6 - 2/9 1042 A 69 26 +43 
[b]CNN 2/7 - 2/8 806 A 76 23 +53 [/b] 
Pew Research 2/4 - 2/8 1303 A 64 17 +47 
Gallup 2/5 - 2/7 1500 A 64 22 +42 
Rasmussen 2/3 - 2/5 1500 LV 61 36 +25 




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:26:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

National Debt by President

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/thefederalbudget/ig/Political-Economic-Measures/Debt-GDP-by-President.htm

Debt here says its more like 87%, not over 100%

http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/04/the_best_debt_c.html

An interesting site about why spending works in times like these

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html



The first link showed 69%, which is the figure I have seen on other sources.

I'm not sure where the 87% is coming from.  He broke the debt down into two separate categories to arrive at that number, but I'm not sure what those categories are based on. 

The link didn't say and I haven't bothered to research it, just thought you might already know and save me the trouble.




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:44:49 PM)



Well willbeur, what I would enjoy hearing is a valid basis for your claims about double-digit inflation, double-digit interest rates, and debt exceeding 100% of GDP.

I mean other than telling me and others to study monetary policy.

You must have some sort of basis for these claims, so why not share and let's discuss things from whatever facts you have to offer.

You did give somewhat of a basis for the inflation claims, though it was a dubious source, but offered nothing for the others.  I would be particularly interested in hearing about the double-digit interest rates.









maidheather -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 7:53:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Did a Scandal Sink the U.S.S. Palin?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-03/did-a-scandal-sink-the-uss-palin/

quote:

From Link:

Palin may have resigned from politics altogether. According to NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, Palin "has told some of her biggest backers in the national Republican Party that they are free to choose other candidates for 2012." But those choices are dwindling at a surprisingly rapid pace.



Rush in 2012?




Brain -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:12:17 PM)


Google Sarah Palin Federal Indictment.




tazzygirl -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:24:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

National Debt by President

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/thefederalbudget/ig/Political-Economic-Measures/Debt-GDP-by-President.htm

Debt here says its more like 87%, not over 100%

http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/04/the_best_debt_c.html

An interesting site about why spending works in times like these

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html



The first link showed 69%, which is the figure I have seen on other sources.

I'm not sure where the 87% is coming from.  He broke the debt down into two separate categories to arrive at that number, but I'm not sure what those categories are based on. 

The link didn't say and I haven't bothered to research it, just thought you might already know and save me the trouble.


ah, i see the confusion. the links are beneath, not above. if you click http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/04/the_best_debt_c.html
look to the right... it shows a break down of Total Debt, in red.. GDP in blue.. and the Ratio in Green




harddaddy4u -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:31:37 PM)

This column goes a long way towards exposing the nonsensical attacks on Sarah Palin for what they really are.

Forgetting Sarah Palin




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:42:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

ah, i see the confusion. the links are beneath, not above. if you click http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/04/the_best_debt_c.html
look to the right... it shows a break down of Total Debt, in red.. GDP in blue.. and the Ratio in Green


No, my confusion is the distinction he is making between total debt and public debt.  He has total debt at 87%, public debt at 56%, which  very roughly equates to the 69% figure in your first link if you average them.

The 69% is what I have seen in all the other sources I have checked.

So my question is what is he defining as total debt versus public debt?




tazzygirl -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:46:06 PM)

From the CNN site

quote:

That's far below Obama's 76 percent approval rating, which is higher than other recent national surveys by other organizations.

"Other polls have shown Obama's approval rating in the mid to high 60s, but those polls also have 10 to 20 percent saying that they don't have an opinion on Obama. We have only 1 percent saying that they are undecided about Obama," Holland said. iReport.com: Can Obama fix the economy?



http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/09/poll.obama.stimulus/

and, no, no appology is forthcoming. Their results are extremely skewed. When every other polling system is telling you your results are wrong, and they even admit in their own article why they are off.... read a bit further when finding sources.




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:52:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: harddaddy4u

This column goes a long way towards exposing the nonsensical attacks on Sarah Palin for what they really are.

Forgetting Sarah Palin


Personally, I think DNA tests should be done to see if Ann Coulter and Sarah Palin were twins separated at birth.

I don't think two identical whack jobs could have come from different families.




Brain -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 8:59:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: harddaddy4u

This column goes a long way towards exposing the nonsensical attacks on Sarah Palin for what they really are.

Forgetting Sarah Palin



And Coulter is ridiculous. You wasted my time reading her krud.




tazzygirl -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 9:03:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

ah, i see the confusion. the links are beneath, not above. if you click http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2006/04/the_best_debt_c.html
look to the right... it shows a break down of Total Debt, in red.. GDP in blue.. and the Ratio in Green


No, my confusion is the distinction he is making between total debt and public debt.  He has total debt at 87%, public debt at 56%, which  very roughly equates to the 69% figure in your first link if you average them.

The 69% is what I have seen in all the other sources I have checked.

So my question is what is he defining as total debt versus public debt?



hi rule

i had to dig into the site a bit to find out the answer to your question.

quote:

First, as to "paying down the debt", it is important to realize that the total debt that causes all the IOUSA-type concern consists of two different parts, with very different natures.

1) The debt owed to the public, payment on which is guaranteed by the Constitution. This is $5.5 trillion ($2.8t owed to Americans and $2.7t owed to foreigners). This never has to be paid down, nobody is proposing to pay it down, and nobody is worried about it bankrupting the US. In the past it has been a good deal larger than it is today. It's paid for defense, infrastructure, moon landings, and a lot of other stuff.

2) The unfunded promises of future entitlement benefits (Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, federal & military pensions etc.) for which the government now is legally on the hook, and which thus is an "accrued debt". These total $47 trillion discounted to present value, and are growing at well over $2 trillion a year. (It includes the $4.1 trillion of intra-governmental debt.)

The thing is, this amount *must be paid off*. It is not carried debt like item #1, it is an amount the government has promised *to spend*. It cannot be "carried" like the debt held by the public because it is a spending promise.


http://www.optimist123.com/optimist/2008/09/youtube-food-fo.html

and before someone snaps.. lol.. this was written september 2008




Brain -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 9:10:10 PM)

Did a Scandal Sink the U.S.S. Palin?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-03/did-a-scandal-sink-the-uss-palin/


This is closer to the truth, not that nonsense Ann Coulter wrote.




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 9:39:48 PM)

Well, I didn't mean to put you through the work of researching it, I could have done that myself.  I just thought you might have been familiar and known already.  But thank you.

It does seem though that the 69%  is accurate.  His 87% figure is arrived at by including future entitlement payments as part of current debt.  While there may be something said for that theory, that's not the accepted method of calculation.




rulemylife -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 9:46:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Did a Scandal Sink the U.S.S. Palin?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-03/did-a-scandal-sink-the-uss-palin/


This is closer to the truth, not that nonsense Ann Coulter wrote.


Am I starting to see double or did you already post this link?

But yes, it wouldn't surprise me if this turned out to be true.

An abrupt resignation like she did could really only be attributed to one of two things.  Either she is completely unstable and operating on emotion instead of logical thought or she was trying to avoid a political and legal showdown over some thorny issue.




DomKen -> RE: Palin to resign as governor (7/9/2009 9:58:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
You havent shown any of my numbers to be wrong. Are you here to embarass yourself like DomKen, who is in hiding after his asinine claims about the money supply going down?

Naughty. Don't make claims that aren't true.

Your claims are based on one source that doesn't source the data or reveal methodology. The facts are all the indicators are contrary to those claims.

You can continue to claim things you can't prove but I'd watch the ad hominen I've been being gentle with you because you're new and I figured Mod XI would take care of you soon enough.



There you go embarassing yourself again. Please, do yourself a favor and read about monetary policy and the Fed, which is the only way money supply can be radically impacted. Changes in asset valuation have NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH MONEY SUPPLY. Your inability to understand that just shows how uneducated you are.

Changes in asset valuation has everything to do with money supply. Lines of credit are extended based on asset value.

quote:

Cant win your own fight so you want a Mod to bali you out? You sound like a little girl.

No I don't want anyone to get mod spanked but I am trying to nicely warn you that the reason no one has really let you have it for your flaming is because we all know Mod XI would spank us. I think you would be wise to cut out the flames before you get the treatment yourself.




Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125