The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Termyn8or -> The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 9:50:41 PM)

Hypothetical situation. You have a job counting money. This is not at a store, this is at a major place where hundreds of thousands of dollars are counted every day. Every bag, every package or whatever must come out exactly to the penny, and there are no excuses. You are actually recounting money to make sure the figures are accurate.

Then, you come across a twenty that looks odd, never seen it before and you decide to take it and replace it with a regular twenty of your own. The tally is correct. Later you find, for axample that it is a silver certificate and worth many times it's face value to collectors. So you then make sure that every day you have every denomination of currency and maybe even coin to do it again.

Now before you make a snap judgement and say "THAT'S STEALING", think about this. Such old bills etc. are destroyed by the federal reserve once they get there. And if you let it go, that money goes to a bank where they have counters that are on the lookout for such bills. When they find them all they have to do is fill out a form and slip in a note about it, why the tally isn't right. But in the end wealth, specifically in the form of that old note or coin, is destroyed. The net result of your action is nil, the tally comes out right, the boss is pleased, everything is hunky-dory. But you land a few bucks.

You may say "but still......" but that is negated by the fact that you KNOW for a fact that the intrinsic value, ergo the wealth involved here, will be utterly wasted. It benefits noone at all. Not any fellow Citizen, not even the damn government, it becomes a total waste. (research that if you want, I already know, anything that says "redeemable in lawful money" is destroyed immediately). In fact if you keep it you are saving the government, ergo the people money. The energy required to ignite and burn the old bill, as well as the resources used to print a new one.

Who has what has nothing to do with this morality, it doesn't matter if your boss wipes his ass with hundred dollar bills. I am talking about a more intrinsic morality. For example if working at one of the stores, I think it would be good to go to the boss and offer to do this and split it with him. But when you work at the clearinghouse or whatever to call it, what do you do ?

Or would it be more moral to just call it in as a suspected counterfeit bill and let them take it directly to the shredder ?

Maybe the question could be put as - if you gain, but noone, and I mean noone else loses, is it theft or is it more like....... salvage ?

I have other examples, and in one the supposed theft actually is beneficial to those who provided the "booty". We'll get to that. But in each case, there is no cost to anyone. In these cases can it be called theft ? IIRC in Ohio theft is defined as depriving for personal gain. If that is the case then it is not illegal. But then is it moral ? And just how close is any morality involved with law these days anyways ?

I used this as the most extreme example. Other examples are quite different.

T




subfever -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 10:06:19 PM)

In your example, I do not perceive the action as either theft or immoral behavior. 




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 10:27:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

In your example, I do not perceive the action as either theft or immoral behavior. 


Same here. Perfectly OK as far as I'm concerned. I used to have an employee who did this many times a day, culling out everything from silver certificates to silver coins, and the only problem I had with it was that the fucking ((*&^% beat me to it.




SteelofUtah -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 10:28:11 PM)

Ask you Boss see what they say..... I GUARANTEE you that they will tell you it is grounds for Termination based on Theft as you cannot EXCHANGE any CURRENCY at any job that reports to the Federal Reserve, In Fact if you do it falls under counterfiting laws and you will be visited by the Secret Service.

TRUST me on this I worked in a Casino in Vegas. Exchanging Bills is HIGHLY suggested against and if you are caught you will lose your job and if they think you have been doing anything else criminal they will investigate and any snease that is out of procedure will be seen as the reason anything came up missing.

While I worked for Poker Palace (VERY SMALL CASINO) one of the Cash Count Clerks exchanged a 50 cent piece that came out of one of the boxes because it was a Franklin Silver Piece, by the time the casino was done they with the court system he had lost his severance package his last pay check and the judge awarded he pay 10,000 in damages to the casino.

Although you can explain why it is okay to do...... It is almost ALWAYS not allowed and if you were so sure it was an okay thing to do why not clear it with your boss first?

Steel




Loki45 -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 10:48:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah
It is almost ALWAYS not allowed and if you were so sure it was an okay thing to do why not clear it with your boss first?


Simple. Remove the value of the bill from the equation. Maybe you're bundling stacks and it looks a lil funky and won't 'stack' right so you can wrap the band around it. You're literally just exchange one good bill for another. Suppose you don't even find out its worth until after the fact. At the time, you still simply changed one piece of paper for another.

I worked at a job once where someone asked if I had a quarter. The vending machine wasn't taking hers and she was thirsty. I chaned it without a second thought. Then later, I looked at that quarter. It was a silver 1942 quarter, already with $2. Do I hunt her down and say "hey, you gave me a silver quarter"? Nope. Her loss, my gain. Neither of us knew it at the time, so when it was discovered, possession=9/10 of the law. It's now my quarter.

Edited to add: If you know the value of the bill ahead of time, you do it on the sly, and you shut your yap about it. No harm, no foul. In a job market where people can be and are fired for a single comment made, where the 'little guy' is always screwed in some way or another, I say if you can legally stick it to the man....by all means. Stick away.




aravain -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/3/2009 11:17:12 PM)

protip: When offering a hypothetical situation to see what people think is the most moral choice, advocating for one (or more) of the choices is usually not kosher.

In my case? I'd probably not do it. Not out of any sense of morality or legality, but just 'cause I wouldn't. *shrug*

Tempted? Sure. But that 20 I'd exchange it with is alllll the way in my wallet! This one is here and just needs to go back on the table :P




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 7:25:08 AM)

The bills and their value, whatever that may be, belong to the owner. Diminishing their value by taking an unexpected gain, is theft. You are taking adavantage of the ignorance (not knowing they are silver certificates) of the owner. I would remove inform the owner of the find, and allow them to make a decision on what they want to do with their property.

In fact, it was not large amounts, but I was paid with some silver dimes once when working at a small store. I informed the owner, and he removed the silver dimes. They were his property.

If working for the owner of a landfill, and you discover property that has diamonds on it, and you swap some land with the woner of the landfill for this land. You have taken advantage of their ignorance. If you are their employee, entrusted with verifying their wealth, you have a responsibility and duty to that company in these instances.

Anything else is justification for greed and deceit (making a monetary gain by the withlding of information). This may not be popular and it may not be kosher, but I tend to call shit as I see it.




windchymes -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 7:59:54 AM)

Steel makes the best argument.  Regardless of right, wrong, moral, immoral, you still have to adhere to the rules set  by the employer, since they are the ones signing your paycheck.  And usually, you are presented with their policies and procedures before accepting the job so that if you violate them, it can be grounds for dismissal. I would think that any employer with a high-volume money-counting department would have a state-of-the-art security and observation system.

The "eye in the sky" will get you every time. 




sweetsub1957 -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 10:07:15 AM)

Actually, if you read what it says on the bill, in the upper portion it says "silver certificate," so......  Anyway, I would not do it.  You could always ask your boss though.  If in doubt, ask.




marie2 -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 10:16:49 AM)

I wouldn't do it.  Morally I wouldn't really have a problem with it under the circumstances you presented,  but on a legal level it would be too scary for me to take a chance.




DesFIP -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 10:29:05 AM)

Hypothetical question indeed since those who work with money, are not allowed to have any on their persons.
But yeah, go see what the company policy is and ask for clarification if necessary. If you've signed an employment contract forbidding such things then by breaking policy you are being unethical.




FullCircle -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 10:30:27 AM)

I worked for a bank once upon a time and we sorted through thousands of pounds in all kinds of currencies. We each had this A4 laminated sheet showing the collectables for each currency being dealt with. With cameras everywhere the last thing you felt comfortable doing was dipping into your pocket and exchanging bank notes for two reasons:

1. It looks like stealing on a CCTV monitor no matter what the reality may be and it would be hard to prove your true intentions one way or another.
2. Banks know how many collectables are in circulation thus they know what number of them they'd expect to be turned over on a given day, distinguishing from those collectors and those ignorant of the difference in society.

Perhaps I'm thinking too specifically here but a similar argument could be made by those relying on insurance companies to pick up the bill for crime. Sure they are big corporations would they care when they expect a certain amount of risk, yes they would.

Banknotes are the ultimate moral question since they have no real value.





IrishMist -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 10:38:41 AM)

I would have to agree with Steel on the legal issues; and Master Orion on the moral/ethical issues.





stella41b -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 12:56:06 PM)

If I'm handling money for someone other than myself it stays separate from my own money. Doesn't matter if it's money for an employer, a bank, or a friend.




pahunkboy -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/4/2009 3:11:49 PM)

lets go at it from a tribal perspective,

in a tribal mode- the elders of the tribe mete out the rules and guide the community and are the decider of things such as this.   One problem is that in todays world- there is human and non-human.  People, it seems are less likely the screw over a follow human then a system, the grid, the system, a corporation.

Next- ponder WHOM are the elders of today?     The TV?   The courts?   The congress?   And being that the elders of today increasingly are not the example for others to live by, the do as I say  -- not as I do applies.

Enter into the equation- that in the 2009, less and less humans have a genuine stake in any such community or tribe.

One of the ugly realities of it all- is that to a large extent we are the mirror of the world itself.  

Greed and fear are nothing new.    When the Brits and others came to America and fought the Indians, in the middle of the night a few woman defected and went to live with the Indians as the preferred way of living.  A profound statement indeed!

Many years ago- I needed some quick cash.  So I went to a bank to so cash advances. I seen some real silver that I asked to be the cash paid to me.  It had just come in.  The teller said no. We argued.   She was so concerned over it- that she miscounted the money she paid to me during this transaction.   To the tune of $200.    At the end of the day I got a frantic, "we are going to call the police" call from the bank.    It sure was a strange event.  The short was just enough to meet bail of a person I bailed out of jail that day.   

With a grid it is easy to not give a crap.  But in a tribe, the respect and reputation with the other humans is paramount- and such acts of greed are less frequent.








Termyn8or -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/5/2009 11:02:08 AM)

OK, so far so good, but people are focusing on the money. Let's say it was something else. To explain this scenario unfortunately I have to explain a bit of electronics and I will keep as short as I can.

Transformers exist in many types of electronic equipment. They work because when you induce a current to flow in a wire a magnetic field is created. When another wire is in range of that field it will induce a voltage across that wire as well.

So a guy owns some land and the utility co. puts up high tension wires over the property. The property owner puts a wire on the ground under the wires and voila, there is voltage there. Free power. Now in this case understand if he draws power (current) from it he is increasing the efficiency of the electric co.'s wire. Nobody loses, in fact they gain, both on the generating end as well as on the user end. There is less loss in the wire.

Basically he is salvaging the waste electromotive force. Now despite the fact that he cost noone a dime, and actually saved people just a small amount, the courts have held that this is theft nonetheless.

There is no connection to the power wires, the guy has not climbed the poles nor touched anything they own. He simply layed a wire on the ground and this is called theft, even though there is no loss whatsoever, in fact there is a gain. I know my electronics theory pretty damn well and I can tell you for sure and this is what I say, that power he gets does not show up on anyone's meter, nor does it impose a heavier drain on the generator, or grid, or wherever they are getting the power they are selling.

Without me being a lawyer, it was probably not argued that the power company sells power from the wires, not the waste EMF around those wires. They put the guy in jail.

The point is the morality of it, if someone needs more technical aspects of this just ask. The point is not necessarily that the guy went to jail, I am talking morality not law. Now with that stance, what of solar cells ? You seemingly get something for nothing. The only major difference I see here is there is nobody around to bitch about someone "stealing" solar power. The sun does not have lawyers on retainer.

Opinions now ?

T




FullCircle -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/5/2009 11:08:21 AM)

That wouldn't work because the wire would have to coiled for the magnetic field to induce the current in the right direction along the wire. Also transformers work at around 98% efficiency something is always lost in terms of heat, noise/vibration generation (that humming noise you hear). You'd be better off putting up a wind turbine and pondering the moral dilemma of stealing wind energy from god.


here=hear




DomImus -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/5/2009 11:17:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah
Ask you Boss see what they say..... I GUARANTEE you that they will tell you it is grounds for Termination

Although you can explain why it is okay to do...... It is almost ALWAYS not allowed


Not to pick nits but...








SteelofUtah -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/5/2009 12:04:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah
Ask you Boss see what they say..... I GUARANTEE you that they will tell you it is grounds for Termination

Although you can explain why it is okay to do...... It is almost ALWAYS not allowed


Not to pick nits but...



Fair enough.

In Any situation in which you deal exclusivly with Legal Tender and have to report it to any treasury agency "I GUARANTEE"

If it is a Matter of a Cash Register and Clerk Job " It is almost ALWAYS not allowed"

If you ask a Supervisor that will tell you what company policy is. I have been fired for collecting $2 bills. I always replaced the cash but in doing so I removed money from the register and that is NOT allowed unless making a Cash Drop or Giving Change because I was doing neither I was fired on the spot... and Yes that was the ONLY reason I was let go.

As for the situation that Term brought up later you get the idea of is it okay to cheat the system.

If I can find a way to Bleed off something that does not affect anyone else is it okay to do so. The Answer is Moraly .... No. Getting something for free that you know should usually be paid for based of someone else who is paying for it even if you do not effect their bill is wrong.

Your Process is the same as Pirating someone elses cable. It is There, they are paying for it, you taking the feed does not increase their bill but yet it is still a crime.

Now all that being said I believe it is important to say that I am not saying that tiy should NOT do just know that it is not right to do and according to most legal structures is not legal or at least unethical.

That being said If I have to steal a Loaf of bread to feed my starving Family I will do it and should I be caught I will face the consequences of my acts even if in doing so I make things for my family worse.

The idea is can you live with the possible outcome of your actions?

Steel




pahunkboy -> RE: The NEXT moral question - theft/salvage (7/5/2009 2:12:43 PM)

Got it.

Well these same waves tho- are harmful to the body.  Most likely the guy is being bombarded by a large amount of electronic smog. His health is at risk- so the owner of such current then is whom?

When the "property" is an asset to a person- then some corporation owns it.  When the same property is a liability, then the corporation does not own it.

Many laws are only in place to keep the power that be- in power.

When I lived related living- I ran the TV wire across to her place.  I added her name to the account.  People seen it - I am sure someone turned us in.  But- her name, and my name was on the account. Her name on both of the dwellings...  so it was over looked.

This makes me think of the giant garbage patch the size of Texas floating around in the Pacific.  Note- no one seems to own it.  But the minute that junk has any type of value- the big boys will claim ownership of it.

You do bring up an interesting point.  Electric and gas is going up @ 42%.  As a property owner- I don't think that I must allow any easement.   Once the utility no longer serves the public good- then I am not obligated to allow any easement.  Recall the rolling Enron black outs in California.
The point - is- if the whole block revoked easement- the whole town- per haps the utility would change its mind.  When this was announced- I poked around.  The same names on one board of directors - is on the competitions too!    Throw in 6 million dollar a year CEO, and 1 million to lobby the state congress.   That could be cut by 95%.

I live on a busy street.  If you know how to do it- there is platinim on the sides of the roads.   If I ever figure that one out- you can bet  it will become illegal.

But lets examine those who want more laws.   How many laws have YOU broken?  

There are ugly forces at work.  All over the country.  The idea is to monetize and robber baron everyone and everything.

Another thing. If someone is too happy... all laughing and singing and smiling.   Oh no!!  We cant have that!   NO.  

Jim had a dude from the gas company accuse him of stealing gas.  His bill was not high enough so they sent out a man to question him.   I would have been livid.     The gas bill was low- because he heats with OIL, not gas.  The gas if for the stove to cook with.

Why are things so expensive.  Even when a service is $29.99,  the fees etc.

Speaking of the gas bill- if I pay mine online- then I no longer would get a paper bill.   otherwise the fee is $4.95 to pay online.  I am absent minded- I want a paper bill.  I am glad I read that closely- as they sneak things in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZK6lzLe1Kc  I did a screen capture for google annoying math quiz.

As to your question- I dont consider what the guy did to be a crime.





Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875