RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/1/2006 5:25:25 PM

Jasmyn

Posts: 1234
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: New Zealand
Status: offline

Oh lol! How can they do that, when I'm so naieve, innocent and demure ;) thanks for letting me know I hadn't realised :) and thanks for the generous offer but I have a domain name and hosting for a site that I'm working on now. Will re link my posts when that is ready to go. :)

Back to Starhawk's words, I so agree with her in that respect. It's like the word 'fat', or 'slut' or 'bitch' or 'whore' or whatever derogatory term someone wishes to throw at someone else...it is so freeing and refreshing and be able to turn around to someone who is slinging them and say 'yeah I am, you have an issue with that?' or some such other retort that claims the term for yourself.

_____________________________

quote:

"To learn the art of submission a slave must first give up the desires that drew him to submission in the first place." Mistress Jasmyn Jan 2005.

Visit My Website

(in reply to DiannaVesta)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/6/2006 9:06:23 PM

MarinaBlack

Posts: 121
Joined: 8/6/2005
Status: offline

A "funny" story I have to share.
I once new a sub - gorgeous, useful, financially secure, smart...
He was recovering from the end of his D/s relationship - a relationship HE ended.

He had been a full-on slave to a beautiful lesbian dominant. This relationship was straight out of a book - she kept him under her stairs, he would sign over his paycheques on pay day, in the home he was a naked slave to do her bidding at all times.

Then, she ended her realtionship with a woman and ended up in a hetero romance. He was outraged. That she could suddenly develop a love for cock and NOT HIS...

He became sullen, then angry and then he ended his relationship with her. I don't know where he's at with this now (this was over 10 years ago and I have not seen in almost as many as he left the scene altogether), but the last I heard he was still angry about "what she did to him."

Ironic.

(in reply to philipsub)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/6/2006 9:54:52 PM

subtlesubie

Posts: 138
Joined: 1/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

Ironic.

That's not ironic.

(in reply to MarinaBlack)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/7/2006 8:05:31 AM

GoddessDustyGold

Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004
From: Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtlesubie

quote:

Ironic.

That's not ironic.

*Smile* You're right.
It is not ironic.
It is typical.

_____________________________

Dusty
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety
B Franklin
Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them
The Hidden Kingdom

(in reply to subtlesubie)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 7:29:17 AM

tern

Posts: 2
Joined: 2/20/2006
Status: offline

i believe that, for me, servitude would best be expressed in a heterosexual relationship where i belonged to a dominant Mistress. But if She were to lend me to others..a lesbian couple, for example..i would obey Her. tern

(in reply to blackpearl81)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 11:28:36 AM

BlondBlueSub4U

Posts: 9
Joined: 12/31/2005
Status: offline

...

< Message edited by BlondBlueSub4U -- 3/9/2006 11:29:30 AM >

(in reply to subtlesubie)

Profile

Post #: 46

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 11:42:18 AM

TeeGO

Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtlesubie

quote:

Ironic.

That's not ironic.

The thing is, he supposedly gave up complete control. But after he gave up complete control, he was then upset that he was no longer in control.

Sounds ironic to me.

irony: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning

(in reply to subtlesubie)

Profile

Post #: 47

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 11:48:24 AM

TeeGO

Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tern

i believe that, for me, servitude would best be expressed in a heterosexual relationship where i belonged to a dominant Mistress. But if She were to lend me to others..a lesbian couple, for example..i would obey Her. tern

Well then my friend, you shouldn't jump into a relationship with a Domme that demands you surrender complete control. Make sure her having sexual relations with you are part of the deal before hand. The fellow descirbed above said one thing, and did another.

(in reply to tern)

Profile

Post #: 48

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 12:01:46 PM

TeeGO

Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

The concept of Female Supremacy is a fallacy. There is no such thing as one sex being supreme over the other. People are individuals.

In fact due to the male's superior physical strength, in barbaric societies, history has recorded men enslaving women. It's not happened the other way around on a large scale. Or course some Female Supremacy advocates believe that will happen in the future. I'm sorry, but as male submissive I scoff at that idea, even if it does turn me on.

On a personal basis my kink runs toward the idea. Not that I could submit to every female. No way. Not to every Domme either. My submission would need to be earned. Only then would complete surrender happen.

Could I live long term in a typical "Female Supremacy" type relationship? I have to be honest and say I don't know at this point. But one thing I can say is that I'd love to visit it for an extended stay.

(in reply to TeeGO)

Profile

Post #: 49

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 12:35:11 PM

DiannaVesta

Posts: 1087
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Mid-Atlantic area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeGO

The concept of Female Supremacy is a fallacy. There is no such thing as one sex being supreme over the other. People are individuals.

In fact due to the male's superior physical strength, in barbaric societies, history has recorded men enslaving women. It's not happened the other way around on a large scale. Or course some Female Supremacy advocates believe that will happen in the future. I'm sorry, but as male submissive I scoff at that idea, even if it does turn me on.

On a personal basis my kink runs toward the idea. Not that I could submit to every female. No way. Not to every Domme either. My submission would need to be earned. Only then would complete surrender happen.

Could I live long term in a typical "Female Supremacy" type relationship? I have to be honest and say I don't know at this point. But one thing I can say is that I'd love to visit it for an extended stay.

I don't think you took the time to read the thread entirely.

_____________________________

(in reply to TeeGO)

Profile

Post #: 50

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 1:20:47 PM

subtlesubie

Posts: 138
Joined: 1/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

quote: Teego

The thing is, he supposedly gave up complete control. But after he gave up complete control, he was then upset that he was no longer in control.

Sounds ironic to me.

irony: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning

Hey Teego, you took the words right out of BlondeBlueSub4U's mouth! Ha ha. How many profiles you got anyways? Are you male or female? Inquiring minds want to know!

Well troll, i don't consider it ironic because the outcome of the scenario does not run contrary to expectations. There is no expectation that the lesbian is going to get with the male slave, so when she doesn't, it isn't ironic. It is something, I'll give you that, and if you and Alanis want to believe it is irony than that's fine by me.

edited for spelling mistakes

< Message edited by subtlesubie -- 3/9/2006 1:24:31 PM >

(in reply to TeeGO)

Profile

Post #: 51

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 2:29:58 PM

subtlesubie

Posts: 138
Joined: 1/5/2006
Status: offline

Now this is ironic.

(in reply to subtlesubie)

Profile

Post #: 52

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 8:48:00 PM

TeeGO

Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

I'm no Troll. But I do share the computer with blondblue and I do make that mistake now and then.

As for the topic, you are entitled to your opinion, as am I.

(in reply to subtlesubie)

Profile

Post #: 53

RE: Gynarchy and Female Supremacy - 3/9/2006 8:53:39 PM

TeeGO

Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DiannaVesta

I don't think you took the time to read the thread entirely.

Yes I did. If I was responding to your post and views I would have said I respect your opinion and was most enlightened to hear that point of view in that way. But to the OP (one that believes females are in fact supreme over males) my remarks were a contrast to his and he was asking for opinions.

(in reply to DiannaVesta)

Profile

Post #: 54