tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Arpig So I am to understand that because it is the 4th of July, it is: 1) Lawful to make threats of bodily harm & property damage. 2) The police are intended to keep the peace, not enforce the law. 3) That it would be wrong to arrest people who were clearly breaking the law because it is the 4th of July and there would have been some bad press. 4) It is ok to deprive people of their 1st Amendment rights, if the way they choose to excercise those rights annoys people. 5) That the non-existant rights of the mob now take precedence over the very well established rights of the individual. 6) That the police can freely trespass on your land and confiscate your property without the benefit of a warrent or court order. quote:
Make a choice folks. The DA made one. Yes he did, and he made the wrong choice. He made the easy choice, the popular choice, but still the wrong choice. The reason why the Bill of Rights is included in the basic founding law of the land is so that those rights trump all other laws. What the whiner (who, I think is an idiot, btw) did was 100% within his constitutional rights as an American, and what the DA and police did was 100% against the law. The fact that a flag was involved changes nothing, nor does the fact that it was the 4th of July. As Panda siad, the law is the law, 365 days a year. And you keep saying the Police. did you not read they were acting on the behalf of the DA? The rest, no doubt, because the idiot, and no i wont put that into quotes because this is all money driven, will be sorted out in court, where it should have been all along. Instead, everyone picked up on the whiners crying jag.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|