|
DemonKia -> RE: Back and f####### confused (7/11/2009 11:30:17 PM)
|
FR, after read thru
[sm=jerry.gif]
LOL
[sm=popcorn.gif]
OP, your profile reads like total horny net geek material, all kink & nothing else . ... . . That's a red flag for me . . ....
There is the issue that the only labels CM offers kinda 'force' people to put themselves into particular boxes that carry a lot of expectations, assumptions, baggage, & so on . . . . .. Frankly, my experience is a lot of people who think they're 'submissive' are as much or more so 'bottoms', some might even be 'dominant bottoms', lol . .. ... Or they might be better described as 'fetishists' or 'kinksters' . . . ... So, OP, you can be forgiven your confusion as far as this applies to your situation . . . . . .
& really, was there ever some time when one could somehow consistently & reliably shop for a compliant submissive with no or few desires of their own? Cuz that sounds like a load of nostalgic hooey . . . ..
[sm=soapbox.gif] [sm=tantrum.gif]
Oooooooh, & extra demerits for the OP's inability to take critique (another red flag), & straw-man argumentation style -- nobody argued the OP's honesty, so waving that around is distracting from the other posters' actual peer-review thoughts . . .. . & wow, so impressed with the yelling, inability to control temper -- another red flag . . .. ..
[sm=lalala.gif] [sm=hissyfit.gif]
Oh. & major demerits for demonstrating a serious inability to listen & hear feedback, big giant red flag for me . . . . .
(lol . . . . . Where's the unicorn scampering away icon?)
[sm=rofl.gif] [sm=rofl.gif] [sm=rofl.gif] [sm=rofl.gif]
More, OP, more . . . . You're meeting some of my entertainment needs, thanks! [:D]
|
|
|
|
