Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: moral/ethics..


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: moral/ethics.. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/18/2006 7:45:23 PM   
Troubleinparadis


Posts: 55
Joined: 2/7/2006
From: Tulsa, Ok
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: LadyElizabeth

Would you, submit, or Dominate to someone who's morals and ethics did not match your own in all areas?


as most have said, it would depend.....for me it would depend on what envolvment I had with the sub, and what level of submission I was getting.

If we are talking about a long term slave, sub, servant type......I expect complete submission and as such morals and ethics fall into the same catagory as what she prefers to wear or listen to.....If I dont agree with a moral choice I wouldent allow her to practice it. If I didnt agree with an ethical decision, I would correct it.

As for play partners, I really dont think thier morals or ethics are a concern, except for ones that link up with saftey issues.


(in reply to talmar)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/18/2006 10:55:48 PM   
LATEXBABY64


Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline
i love morals and eithics they are like guide lines for human behavior for those who know what that means. in simple terms if it makes you feel bad its wrong. those are warning bells that hey i screwed up or hey they did something that is not right. now as you say not everyone is the same we are all programmed differently. thats why some match some do not. I am not going to waiste my time trying to educate the value system of people you either are a good person or you suck bottom line is look inward for the answer. while we may judge yes we do you can too. for only we know whats best for us. even if i do not like what someone does as long as it does not affect me i just do not care. its really none of my business. but morals and eithics we all have them we all fallow something. all i know is i try to do what right. cause in the end i am the one that answers to me no one else but god i like that fact know there is someone greater cause if i had to rely on your sorry butts i would never make it out of debt or grow in a great way check it out on your :)

(in reply to Troubleinparadis)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/18/2006 10:57:27 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: talmar

If I thought someone was unethical I would not associate with them inany capacity.



Oh how i wish that were an option, but then i'd have to quit my job :)

(in reply to talmar)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 1:42:30 AM   
dincubus


Posts: 231
Joined: 10/22/2005
From: South Dakota
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyElizabeth

Would you, submit, or Dominate to someone who's morals and ethics did not match your own in all areas?


Personally, I look for similar likes and dislikes, that way i am in my comfort zone. I have been with people who have held values dissimilar to my own on several instances. Heck a friend of min egot me into the lifestyle. And at that time i had not considered anything even remotely near BDSM. It is not so much ethics, i respect everyone's ethics. So i guess you could say, it would be more of if the person's personality would match mine.

(in reply to LadyElizabeth)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 3:52:17 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadiesBladewing


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

buyer beware: since ethics/morals are the essence of ones character which provides the building blocks and foundation of standards for which one makes the judgements of what is "right" or what is "wrong" with regard to another, in the eyes of the beholder, where like a vine, if one runner falls onto bad earth and takes root, the whole plant suffers or even withers and dies.

yes i could possibly serve someone whos moral structure is less developed than my own, only if they demonstrated moral stability under "all" circumstances, and only if the areas that their morals were under developed would not conflict or infringe upon mine.

i would not remotely consider someone who is largely unethical / amoral or immoral as someone i could accept as my friend much less serve.



Ok, my next question here is: Why does there seem to be the assumption that, if someone's morals or ethics are different than yours, they are "less developed"?

It is possible for someone to have a moral and ethical framework that is -quite- carefully and extensively developed, but in which there might be broad areas of divergence about the expression of ethics/morals. Just because there is a variance does -not- mean there is a correlating lack of development in the ethical system in question.

Lady Zephyr


i guess we should start from the beginning here with a couple things i really should address.

My question is how did you conclude "different"?

i specifically said less than, unless you feel that less than cannot occur and only different is valid, then i think you first need to determine exactly what it is you trying to say here.

Ed gein is less than, manson is less than, ted bundi is less than, the pope is more than, other religious leaders are more then. Whats the problem?

So there is no such a thing as less than? Just different is that your point?: if you do not believe there is such a thing as less than lets toss a few knives around the house and you spend the evening watching movies and eating popcorn with charlie manson.

Now by my way of thinking charlie manson has "less" developed morals than the rest of us despite insanity.

i agree that there are morals that are different or even equal for that matter and since they can be different or equal i maintain they can also be greater than or less than.

you are making a lot of really horrible off base assumptions here!

To insert the word different where i specifically less and then come to the conclusion that i some how feel anyone different from me is less developed sort of really distorts what i said into something entirely different now doesnt it?

Then to incorrectly apply it on top of everything else just took this nice conversation totally out in lala land and completely distorted the point i was trying to get across on some whimsical flippant comeback with no grounds.

by all means DO point out where i said if someone is different than i they are less developed than i?

i cited a specific situation and the situation that i cited it not remotely the same as the situation you claim i cited!!!!!

This kind of distortion seems to be going around a lot on here lately, seems like its becoming an epidemic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress
Lady Zephyr, the person you are responding to has made an impression on me, such that anyone who isn't in exact agreement with him on any issue ( morals and ethics being only one of many) is "less developed".


Lets see here:

the very first words out of your mouth you levelled an attack against me. good way to start a nice friendly FLAME WAR um i mean debate!!!

One quick glance around the room and oh my,

Whats this?:

""EXACT AGREEMENT YOU SAY?""

Do quote where i """EVER""" expected someone to EXACTLY AGREE WITH ME on ANYTHING?

Seems there may be a little dirt under the skirt here my dear.

So tell us why you did not allow Lady Zephyr to form her own opinion of me?

Looks to me that maybe you feel yours takes precedence over hers and you want her to think EXACTLY the way YOU DO about me!

Do you feel she is incapable of making up her own mind?

Its getting really muddy around here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress

quote:

yes if i were a dom(me) and controlled their actions such that if thier moral system were less than mine i would not have an issue with that. again the key word here is conflict. of course there are limits to everything regardless of position or identity

Not saying this poster has but many people go off on tangents as a result of missing key words in my posts, comment on it and unfortunately create this kind of animosity.

i do not see where we disagree here or where i am trying to force anyone to agree with me as is being suggested.


My impression is not that you are attempting to force anyone to agree with you, but that you view those who don't think exactly as you do to be "less". Not different, but less than. It's not just here, but in most of your posting that I get this vibe. But it is here that you so clearly state it, not once but twice.


i repeat to what i said to zephyr:

Do point out where i said less = different?

Great you have the impression that different = less therefore it must be how i meant it!!!

you took zephyrs incorrect take on it and without a moments thought on it run to the sidelines and proclaim TOUCHDOWN.

Then to add insult to injury:

quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress

Now, let ME clarify:

Do not ever presume to know what is true for me. You don't know me, who I am, where I have been or where I am going. You do not have the ability to sum up the experiences throughout my life that have shaped my feelings, thoughts, opinions and self without having lived them, which you have not.

With that being said, I will kindly bow out of this conversation, as anything more that I would add, would simply be redundant.


Read me the riot act? Like whats the purpose of this to draw my attention from the fact your whole premise is based on your inability to take what i said in context?

Hey i know a lot more about you then you may know!

i know you eat, i know you crap and pee just like everyone else. i do not have to eat and crap and pee for you to know this about you as well as a lot of other things about you.

i do not have to run off on a tangent to know thats what you did either now do i?

Like walking out of the room snorting in a huff REALLY makes you somehow correct. Its not a good substitute for knwoing what you are reading before commenting and then trying to clean up afterward by putting your problems on me.

i can presume a lot about you that is far closer to correct than what you have presumed about me thus far.

Like i said to zephyr: if you feel there is only different then great you too can spend a nite with manson and maybe you too will figure there is such as thing as more or less before you are DEAD!!!!

Just because certain people around here choose to close their eyes to reality.

-------------------
what really fries me about a certain few in here is the piss poor attitutes they have towards others:

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyV
I think you misunderstand why I was laughing. I love MoGA. She's so great at handing idiots their balls. I swear.. she's my idol.

When I grow up.. I wanna be just like her.

As for the "True Dominant".. yes.. keep that pepper spray handy. You'll probably need it.

HI expectations! dont break your neck looking up!

Whats up with this people? This was a new guy never posted before frustrated and venting. Just like the OP. These people ripped him up. They were so narrow minded about it and incorrect in what they did i was angry after i read all that. The OP who also is a new poster complained about the way they turned it into a bicker contest JUST LIKE HERE!!!!

Same crap someone read it wrong and the whole crew ran with it patting themselves on the backs for their sideline touchdown!!

This is representative of the attitudes we have in here. Since we are on the subject of morals i feel that everyone has the right to be treated with respect regardless if someone considers them an idiot or not.

The guy should be proud of himself frankly because unlike me he has the tenacity to take the high road and he did take the high road and no matter how assinine these people were to him he did not dive in the dirt with them like i do even tho the way they treated him was totally undeserved.

FACT: tress came here guns loaded and looking for a fight, well you got one now i hope you are satisfied.

Anyone can make a mistake in interpretation but a few have established themselves as an institution around here and what i would like to know is why doesnt this little clique with these shitty attitudes wise up and try being part of the solution instead of part of the problem for a change?

you can bet that guy will never post again, at least not on here.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadiesBladewing)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 3:57:28 PM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.



_____________________________





(in reply to fergus)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 4:35:50 PM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.




Isn't it absolutly gorgeous MistressOfGa?


_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to MistressOfGa)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 4:40:08 PM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist


quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.




Isn't it absolutly gorgeous MistressOfGa?



Yes it is Irish. Very nice.

_____________________________





(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 4:41:14 PM   
yourMissTress


Posts: 1665
Joined: 6/14/2005
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.





OK, now I missed 2 things...going now to find fergus' profile and check him out.

MoGA...where's the flame war?


_____________________________

Tress


"If you have to tell people that you are a lady, you are not." My Grandmother


(in reply to MistressOfGa)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 4:45:59 PM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.





OK, now I missed 2 things...going now to find fergus' profile and check him out.

MoGA...where's the flame war?



Right above my original post.

_____________________________





(in reply to yourMissTress)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 5:52:51 PM   
Petruchio


Posts: 1615
Joined: 2/6/2005
Status: offline
Like so many have said:

It all depends…

(in reply to LadyElizabeth)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 11:29:28 PM   
SimplyV


Posts: 351
Joined: 11/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa

I would like to interupt this flaming war to tell Fergus I love his new photo.





OK, now I missed 2 things...going now to find fergus' profile and check him out.

MoGA...where's the flame war?



Right above my original post.


Omg.. *drools* Dang Fergus looks hot.

And I got flamed. *does a little jig* I dont' think I've gotten flamed before. YES.. This rocks. Its like losing my virginity all over again.

V

*runs off to look for Fergus with the rest of the Switches*

(in reply to MistressOfGa)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/19/2006 11:53:10 PM   
KittenWithaTwist


Posts: 490
Joined: 8/3/2005
Status: offline
Simply put, No. I would not have a d/s relationship with someone who did not closely match my ethical and moral code. It would make me extremely uncomfortable and concerned if I had to worry about the compatibility of our ethical codes of conduct over the course of our relationship.

On a side note, I recently discovered that a co-worker of mine has an entirely different ethical code from myself and it has since caused me to see her in a different light. In fact, it makes me eerily uncomfortable and queasy when I think about her code of conduct and how it influences my relationship with her.

I can only imagine how this would expand in a dating situation.

However, as far as scening goes, if I don't know about someone's ethical code, and I'm in a public environment, I'm less concerned. I know that I'm mostly safe and my partner is close by, so those sorts of things are less of a worry.

_____________________________

"Time travel: It's a cornocopia of disturbing concepts." ~Ron Stoppable

(in reply to LadyElizabeth)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 5:19:07 AM   
MHOO314


Posts: 3628
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyElizabeth

Would you, submit, or Dominate to someone who's morals and ethics did not match your own in all areas?



I've pondered this question to give a fair and accurate answer--I have certain areas that are completely non-negotiable---thoughts on child raising, love for animals, respect for the earth, dealings with past baggage, spirituality---these things have to mesh with Mine---it's been many a submissive who has been removed from the buddy list for ideas that were counter to Mine in the above mentioned----so My answer would be no--key elements have to be in place for Me to proceed.

_____________________________

SLUTS: Southern Ladies Under Tremendous Stress...

Mistress Hathor


(in reply to LadyElizabeth)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 9:37:49 AM   
LATEXBABY64


Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline
thats about the most realistic answer i have heard in a long time
Mistress Hathor kudos to you
purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

(in reply to MHOO314)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 11:20:37 AM   
Submotive


Posts: 440
Joined: 9/9/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyElizabeth

Would you, submit, or Dominate to someone who's morals and ethics did not match your own in all areas?

Being that my submission completely intertwines itself in trust, i would not be able to truly surrender to Someone who's morals and ethics conflicted with mine. i believe this is pretty critical to a D/s relationship and at the heart of any true connection. Trust for me has a tremendous amount to do with Who He is and what He believes is moral and ethical.

As far as ALL areas. Those would definitely need discussion and understanding of O/one another before i could proceed honestly.

_____________________________

Owned by Scotch Master

i would rather continue alone than be permitted to show only parts of myself to my Beloved.

If you're not living as you would like to today, when are you going to start?

(in reply to LadyElizabeth)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 11:27:23 AM   
LATEXBABY64


Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline
i agree with that i think it takes time to get to know one another to many rush into a relationship with the lusting factor going on and never take the time to get to know the person thats why a lot bdsm relationships do not last its to much head space gone amuk reality chk 101

(in reply to Submotive)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 4:28:57 PM   
MistressSassy66


Posts: 1675
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
I pretty much get along with anyone...no matter what their morals/ethics are.
W/we all have some quirks to overlook.



Of course there are exceptions...like pedophiles,rapists,killers(people and animal) etc. I'm thinking not only are their morals/ethics skewed,but they as a whole person are.

_____________________________

Mistress Sassy

http://www.mistresssassy.com

In the Immortal Words of Bob....Fuck the dumb shit.

"I love you not only for what you are,But for what I am when I'm with you."- Opening line from a poem by Roy Croft

(in reply to LATEXBABY64)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/20/2006 4:51:05 PM   
SweetEscravo


Posts: 193
Joined: 12/17/2005
Status: offline
I think this is pretty much the same as in a normal relationship- he's a republican but you aren't, fine. But if he's a neo-nazi and you're a Buddhist, you might not get along.

(in reply to SimplyV)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: moral/ethics.. - 2/21/2006 12:02:04 AM   
Petruchio


Posts: 1615
Joined: 2/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

he's a republican but you aren't…


You think Laura Bush ever had 2nd thoughts?
But I suppose being 1st lady can make up for a lot.

(in reply to SweetEscravo)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: moral/ethics.. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109