tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf quote:
ORIGINAL: slutslave4u quote:
ORIGINAL:OrionTheWolf Actually the investigation starts with reasonable suspicion, which the officer had. There is a distinct difference between resasonable suspicion and probable cause. There are several good sites that explain the differences, and how they effect police procedure. not true here either, If responding to a possible burglary, forced entry or not, even a simple unlocked door, yes, as an officer they will and have the right to search the home to ensure no burglars are inside, which even you would want them to do if it were your home............. Sorry not worth my time to research the case law again. Glad you are on the sidelines making those calls. If you look you should be able to find a Nevada, two Florida and a Missouri case that shows that the call by itself does not constitute probable cause. See now aren't you glad you are retired now. Hell even Terry stops have been challenged and are more strict. And I posted one where a 911 call was the sole reason for a stop and was considered probable cause. Its obviously not as clear cut as you seem to think. Thing is now, the charges have all been dropped. i seriously doubt we will ever see a lawsuit from either side. The PD has cleared the officer... i think the Mayor may still wanna stir in this for a few. But basically, on the front page at least, the issue is over. So, in essence, both were wrong in their actions. Charges were dropped because both were wrong, in my opinion. i do agree with many that this will make a great learning experience. Provided the right lessons are taught. i would suggest a pig roast and a few kegs of beer!
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|