DemonKia -> RE: Additional Profile Criterea (7/24/2009 8:25:53 PM)
|
The offense is as much in the taking as in the giving. & my offense was aimed at those who disdained the offered solution of using the oh-so-flexible 'hide' feature. If you choose to interpret my remarks as applying to you, that is your choice . ... . . (I've bolded & increased font size on the pertinent word that allows the reader to opt in, or not . . . . . ) Part of hanging out on any online fora is the regular opportunities to experience & / or participate in sarcasm & other scathing wit, both valid forms of expression. I thought I was being hysterically funny, actually, channeling my inner Python there . . . . . *shrugs & chuckles* . . . . Still think that was a pretty funny post . . . . . Also, note that the conversations that emanate from an initial posting are not solely & exclusively focused on the OP, & many OPs concern matters much discussed here . . . . . Exposure to previous similar discussions might alert the canny user to potential flammage points prior to posting. I, personally, flame up in defense of professional sex services of all kinds, & around these parts that frequently takes the shape of verbal bitch-slaps at the dog-pile that regularly occurs on professional BDSM providers, without showing any understanding of how those persons engaging in that work fit into the overall out-&-organized kink 'community' . . . . . & specifically, re-reading the thread between the OP & my bitchy (I prefer bitchy to pissy, cuz, well, I am a bitch & it would be so dishonest for me to pretend otherwise at this late juncture) posting, one might note that there were dire imprecations implied for the fate of CM if whatever wasn't done, other than the OP . . . . & reify, if you'd like to engage in positive conversation, might I suggest you address your thoughts about my initial response to your OP . . . . . . . Or, alternately, if you are looking to only encourage viewpoints in agreement with your perspective, then I'd suggest you only engage in dialogue with those who agree with you & ignore the rest of us . . . . . [:D] quote:
ORIGINAL: reify quote:
ORIGINAL: DemonKia FR, after read thru Laziness. All these people not wanting to make use of the 'hide' feature strike me as lazy. They can't be bothered to do anymore work than they have to, & they're gonna whine to high-heaven & issue forth dire predictions about CM's imminent demise if what they think should be done isn't implemented, immediately . ... . . (In very whiny tone of voice.) "CM, save me from having to look at the profiles of professional BDSM providers, I can't use the 'hide' button, it's too much to ask of me. CM, hear my supplication, I am psychic & I know this site is on the road to ruin if it doesn't do what I tell it needs doing. All these professional dominants are making the site unusable for me & my needs are preeminent over everyone else's. & I'm so smart about how a site should be run that I really oughta run my own site, but yet I'm not, I'm here whinging about how lazy I am . . . . " What, did you think CM was gonna FedEx the BDSM soul-mate of your choice to your door, after you were done picking him or her out? [:D] Please don't be so judgemental. Or pissy. Or rude. But if you want to be negative, I guess I can't stop you. I spend 2-3 hours every other day, reading and sifting through every profile in my area. I send measured and specific messages to every dom who seems interesting. I'd put in more time, but I don't have any more. I've been doing this for a year and a half now. Additionally, a simple proposition and justification isn't the same thing as whining. I saw something resembling a problem presented a valid, applicable solution and followed it with a justification. You read and see what tone you want to see. That's fine. Thank you arpig, for pointing out the "hide" function. I have managed to not see that and I'll begin using it!
|
|
|
|