Prinsexx -> RE: What attracts also repels? (7/26/2009 9:13:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW The thing is, many times we get involved in relationships or fall in love with a person because of some trait that fascinates or challenges us. After a time, like any new toy, that interesting characteristic is probably not going anywhere, but unless we've become attached to the entire person in the interim, we may come to notice that set of traits that first attracted us, like moths to the flame, is scorching our asses, and the only solution we can find is to put out the fire or move away from the fire, in our fear that it may consume us. I really appreciate the metaphor of fire. To continue it: these are the type of relationships that have left me feeling burned out. quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW Sometimes, too, the reason that someone attracts a dominant individual is because that particular dominant individual wants to -control- something as conceivably uncontrollable as what that particular yielding individual is. Surely there are aspects to everyone, traits within everyone, which are uncontrollable? It's not possible to own another individual heart, body, mind and soul? I've seen this written in sub missives' profiles though....but retained a sense of self and self-will. quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW The dominant party who secretly questions hir capacity to hold authority may, interestingly, look to hold authority over individuals who have aspects of themselves that they've indicated that they will not yield, and the authority-holder, in such cases, will often measure hir 'success' by whether or not xhe could force this person to give up those things that were, already, off the list. If xhe succeeds, then regardless of the damage it has done, that authority-holder can see hirself as a 'success', and the 'failure' (sorrow, grief, loss, anger) will be on the other party. I've experienced this. And the dominant 'co-opting' my success as their own quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW This is the situation when one hears such lines as "I know xhe doesn't see it, but I was only doing it for hir own good." 'You know you need this form of control...' quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW On the other hand, if the person yielding authority is clear and firm about holding on to those things that xhe has held outside the sphere of authority, then the authority-holder who is insecure may rant about "topping from the bottom" or "being a poor s-type", again, shoving the problems of the relationship off on the other party, in order to make it -clear- (in part to hirself, though xhe doesn't, in many cases, believe hir own press) to all and sundry that -xhe- was a GOOD authority-figure and it isn't hir fault that this individual "couldn't see what was good for hir". The assertive submissive...I wonder how Igot this far if I hadn't been assertive in the world anyway... quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW Anyway, all of this may just be rationalization -- but it's what I've observed, so I thought I'd share. Dame Calla Not a rationalisation at all. There is more than one dynamic usually. And certainly more of a complex dynamic than meets the eye in most cases. I thank you sincerely.
|
|
|
|