RE: Under Protection????????

RE: Under Protection???????? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

NearlyAcquiesced -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/20/2009 10:40:04 AM)
fast reply I've read some of the responses, but here's my take. I can see it as a guy trying to get into a girl's pants under the guise of being a protector, or actually watching out for the person in question. Newbies stepping into a club for the first time cannot always depend on the staff or even the OWNER of the club to watch out for their well being (let alone not take advantage of them..). Personally, I prefer the term confiDom (: And of course you can always have a confisub, as well.

CelticPrince -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/20/2009 12:47:00 PM)
quote: Hi CP.... I have been thinking on this for a long time and 5 pages went by me! Well lets see... it means your ass has some sort of rash and you are asking us what it might mean. The space between your chaps and ass are too close, ie chaps too tight. The space betwee ass and chaps are too loose, so losts of friction. Do you want a solution too? baby powder? desitin? baby balm? bath soak in epson salts? nakie is better than chaps? maybe wear long johns under chaps? Am I helping? realsub, Damn I wish everyone showed as much concern for my glutius minimus, but worry not the ointment I use is first class! CP BTW...I am trying/attempting to PROTECT your ass from a bad case of "chaps." Hope its not catchy over the world wide wow!

CelticPrince -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/20/2009 12:51:54 PM)
quote: it might have been mentioned as this thread is so long i have to admit not reading all, but i thought it ment as much as hookers being under the protection of their pimps... personally i do feel under protection of my Husband as he does indeed protect me and would defend me if needed... when i feel dramatic and weirdly romantic i might get all mushy and very submissive about a subject like this. I wonder why some people who are putting such value on wearing a thing like a collar, living the lifestyle, leather or lace have such problems with other people who like to think they are- or have someone under protection... it is just another link in the kinky chain... sometimes it might be BS sometimes it is BDSM... play nice ranja, I am not sure is you have understood the issue discussed. It does not assume the protection of a collar....... that is automatic. It discusses the issue of uncollared ,probably newcomers, that carry a sign under the protection of........... CP _____________________________ married fem sub amanda when my profile is hidden it is because i do not want to receive any unsolicited mail.

Acer49 -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/22/2009 9:36:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CelticPrince To be concise, this just chaps my ass! What does it mean to you? CP It generally means that someone who is mature and experienced is helping a less experieced and possibably naive individual who makes unwise decisons find a suitable partner. And you care about because? If you attempting to involve yourself with someone who, you come to find out is, unnder protection and you are having a problem, just move on. Do not waste your time getting amnnoyed about it, because, it solves nothing

porcelaine -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/22/2009 9:41:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CelticPrince To be concise, this just chaps my ass! What does it mean to you? CP someone really needs to log off. what are you being protected from? the cyber boogey man? good grief. porcelaine

subbibrat -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/22/2009 11:11:36 PM)
I am not sure about the "protocol" of the term but honestly you either are or aren't working on a relationship so i don't understand the terms "under protection or under consideration". maybe it is an online thing?

Rhodes85 -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/23/2009 12:07:36 AM)
'It generally means that someone who is mature and experienced is helping a less experieced and possibably naive individual who makes unwise decisons find a suitable partner. ' If they make such bad decisions or are so naive then I would think they need to grow up and mature more and learn to make better decisions for themselves before putting themselves in a potentially dangerous situation in a place like this. Speaking of which I noticed just such an profile earlier tonight with the words 'this girl is now my student and I am screening her messages. show respect or you will have to deal with ME. and I don't play well with others' Now am I the only one that sees something a little exploitive about that comment...?

NihilusZero -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/23/2009 12:16:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 If they make such bad decisions or are so naive then I would think they need to grow up and mature more and learn to make better decisions for themselves before putting themselves in a potentially dangerous situation in a place like this. You say this as if it is not an issue inherent to the entire species. Or as if the decision to surrender unto the decision-making of another could not itself be a competent decision.

WyldHrt -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/23/2009 1:11:28 AM)
quote: Or as if the decision to surrender unto the decision-making of another could not itself be a competent decision. Nicely said, Nihilus. If I had the power to award Nihilus points, that would rate 20 or so. [8D]

Rhodes85 -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/23/2009 10:44:04 PM)
I think you misunderstood what I meant by that comment. I was not trying to imply that the girl in question was not competent to make decisions. I was trying to say that while her intention was to find someone to look out for her, that was not what the guy in question was actually doing, as is quite evident by the quote I included. In short, she is being taken advantage of by a person who is claiming to be looking out for her best interests, yet clearly states right afterwards that that is not his real intention.

NihilusZero -> RE: Under Protection???????? (8/24/2009 1:33:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 I think you misunderstood what I meant by that comment. I was not trying to imply that the girl in question was not competent to make decisions. What "girl in question"? You replied to a "generally" comment. Wasn't your response meant "generally" as well? quote: ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 I was trying to say that while her intention was to find someone to look out for her, that was not what the guy in question was actually doing, as is quite evident by the quote I included. In short, she is being taken advantage of by a person who is claiming to be looking out for her best interests, yet clearly states right afterwards that that is not his real intention. Are we talking about the profile you came across? The one your referred to here: quote: ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 Speaking of which I noticed just such an profile earlier tonight with the words 'this girl is now my student and I am screening her messages. show respect or you will have to deal with ME. and I don't play well with others' Now am I the only one that sees something a little exploitive about that comment...? And, if so, then I'm not sure where I'm to be seeing anything supposedly exploitative.

Page: << < prev 8 9 10 11 [12]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125