|
Petruchio -> RE: Supreme-E-est of Supreme (2/21/2006 6:32:43 PM)
|
quote:
Beating a dead horse to a pulp is correct. I say who cares? Neither sex is superior one cannot survive without the other so lets just all get along.
Ah ha! An attempt to inject intelligence into the debate!
Forget the 'supremecy' bullshit, because that's all it is. There was little more sickening than old guard feminists going on about their 'moral supremecy' and the backlash reactionists yapping about their own 'religious and righteous superiority'. I hope we're past that now.
I've noted before that dommes (F) are often fundamentally different from male doms. Often they seem (to me, as an outsider) more humane, more motherly, more willing to be vulnerable. Their great strength appears to be that womanly way of absorbing male faults and lacks. I do not understand submissive males, so I can only observe and attempt to assess.
I grew up around strong women and I admire brains, tenacity, and success. It's that I seek a challenge (although I've been good at melting ice queens), but rather that I want someone with a mind, aspirations, and code that matches my own. I'm fascinated that at least some dommes-F may seek to control some males and females, but succumb to a strong, honorable male, though not necessarily one who forces them to submit. (I may be flattering myself unnecessarily.)
A male needs strength, not necessarily of muscles, but of character, of leadership, of morality, and of love. In that way he can 'earn' a woman, and not merely force or insist upon the submission of one.
|
|
|
|
