RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Falkenstein -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/17/2009 9:29:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Falkenstein

Hello everybody,

I read recently an article in the last edition of The Economist that I got from a neighbouring boat. it is called "Unjust and ineffective" and is about the punition of sexual delicts in the USA. It quite upset me. One case of a woman is particulary disgusting: having as a teenager given a blow job to another one, but younger, she got convicted for "sodomy on a minor", is livelong registred in a sex offender online register... She could be as well branded on her forehead.

I have no qualm with taking out really dangerous criminals, but this offends my most basic sence of justice.

I also wonder, could this not happen to our community too?

I will not comment here any further, I have other duties for the next days, But I really recommend to read the article: it is chilling.
It is on The Economist web site, there is an editorial and the article is under

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14164614&CFID=73550468&CFTOKEN=68009113

I wish I could wish you a good reading

Kinky regards

Henry



(Seems to me someone got their facts a smidge skewed.  Sodomy of course....involves the butthole....and unless one of the parties was a real asshole....something's missing here).


I will never ever again give a mouthkiss to a worman from the state of Georgia ;-)




Danibelle -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/18/2009 10:22:35 AM)

Here's an interesting concept that has been adapted in NYS and probably other states.  When you look up someone on the state sex offender website and you see the little boxes that represent their home or workplace (yes, they're both listed) it COLOR CODES them.  Violent crimes are one color, statutory rape charges are another.  There are quite a few color categories actually.  This allows the person using the site as a reference for a background check to form their own opinions and decide whether or not they would like to give the convicted a chance to explain or rule them out entirely.  This is a good idea.  In NYS it is illegal to engage in sexual acts when you are under the age of 17- it doesn't matter how old your partner is.  Under 17 means you are not old enough to consent to sex.  If you and your partner are BOTH under 17 there are misdemeanor crimes you can be convicted of.  If two 16 year olds have sex and one or both of them are charged and convicted of one of these crimes they would show up on the map in the proper color category so they are NOT listed with people who commited violent crimes.  One sex crime is not equal to another.

About this particular sex crime:  She should have known there would be concequences for giving a blow job in class.  Whether those concequences were on a state legal level or on the school level is irrelevent.  There's NO WAY she thought this was appropriate behavior.  I do not believe this is an innocent mistake.  Sex in school?  Come on!

Then she violated her parole repeatedly.  This is the action that put her in jail.  There is no excuse for violating parole repeatedly.  Unorganized?  That is NOT an excuse.  These lifelong concequences she's complaining about are her own doing as well.  If you KNOW you cannot buy a home within x amount of feet from a day care center, why do you go and buy it?  She SHOULD be evicted.

I think that the law itself wasn't necessary.  Clearly I'm not alone in this since they have repealed this law.  HOWEVER, if the journalist wanted to make a point, they should have chosen a subject who adhered to all the rules and still faced problems.  I don't feel sorry for this girl.  I might have felt sorry for someone else.




angelikaJ -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/18/2009 1:06:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


(Seems to me someone got their facts a smidge skewed.  Sodomy of course....involves the butthole....and unless one of the parties was a real asshole....something's missing here).


"Anal or oral intercourse between human beings, or any sexual relations between a human being and an animal, the act of which may be punishable as a criminal offense."
 
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Sodomy 

edit to add: already covered in post #6 but I couldn't find it.




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 12:54:08 PM)

What you seem to be missing in this converstaion and in the artical is that this girl. only met her lawyer 5 minuets before her hearing. which should have led to her hearing being postponed because 5 minuets is not enough time to talk about anything or for her to even give the facts from her point of view to her lawyer. her lawyer should have also been sacked because this girl would have had a much better chance of getting parol with no parol officer from the judge if shed pleaded not guilty. And if it actually went to court she could have given her side and they would have heard from the boy as well as no dubt by the time they got to that court date hed have been of legal consenting age and no longer a minor. Another thing is. That i myself at the age of 18 got arrested for totally different charges but if my mom my school and my lawyer had not been reminding me constantly when my appointments were or when id be off probation id have been in a whole shit ton more trouble. Age has nothing to do with maturity. espcially when it comes to things like going to court for the first time ever. yes she was idiotic for even doing what she did in the first place. But the punishment she got was severly out of porportion to what she did. i would say expulsion from school with 100 hours community service should have been the absolut worse she got.

also ignorance is no excuse but if shes like me at all i didnt even know my best friend was older than me until it was her birthday. forget knowing how old the kids were in school. so forget not knowing the law. how the hell was she supposed to know how old this kid was just by looking at him. hell even ive come to find after ive been released from a moment of passion and asked questions that someone was a slight bit younger than i was expecting them to be. i felt bad for it too but it happens when people dont ask ages first. And at that age its never something you ask first.




slaveyslave -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 4:00:02 PM)

i assume that the GA anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults was setup as a way to punish gays for being...well gay. Red Necks really really hate gays in a load up in a pickup and kill them kind of way.

But more to the point it seems as though calling two teenagers having sex both of whom are under 18 a sex crime minimizes real sex crimes. There are people who victimize children and they should be tracked but if a teenage girl that had sex with her teenage boyfriend is one the same website how do we know who to look out for. Will she re-offend like other sex predators, most likely not.  She is one the sex offender website because she forgot to see her parole officer. Maybe they should have a regesty for people that had sex before they were 18 and have problems keeping appointments. Wait... the Whitepages.com




thishereboi -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 5:57:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

What you seem to be missing in this converstaion and in the artical is that this girl. only met her lawyer 5 minuets before her hearing. which should have led to her hearing being postponed because 5 minuets is not enough time to talk about anything or for her to even give the facts from her point of view to her lawyer. her lawyer should have also been sacked because this girl would have had a much better chance of getting parol with no parol officer from the judge if shed pleaded not guilty. And if it actually went to court she could have given her side and they would have heard from the boy as well as no dubt by the time they got to that court date hed have been of legal consenting age and no longer a minor. Another thing is. That i myself at the age of 18 got arrested for totally different charges but if my mom my school and my lawyer had not been reminding me constantly when my appointments were or when id be off probation id have been in a whole shit ton more trouble. Age has nothing to do with maturity. espcially when it comes to things like going to court for the first time ever. yes she was idiotic for even doing what she did in the first place. But the punishment she got was severly out of porportion to what she did. i would say expulsion from school with 100 hours community service should have been the absolut worse she got.

also ignorance is no excuse but if shes like me at all i didnt even know my best friend was older than me until it was her birthday. forget knowing how old the kids were in school. so forget not knowing the law. how the hell was she supposed to know how old this kid was just by looking at him. hell even ive come to find after ive been released from a moment of passion and asked questions that someone was a slight bit younger than i was expecting them to be. i felt bad for it too but it happens when people dont ask ages first. And at that age its never something you ask first.


Ok, so you didn't know how old the other kids in your class were, did you know you shouldn't have sex during the movie or were you just real lucky?




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 6:47:59 PM)

well first im a lesbian and thats what the drama closet was for..or the band closet. and second i sat in the front row of classes of maybe 15 so woulda been hard to even get enough kids in a class for it to be plausible. that and i was the only out lesbian in school at the time. sooo unfroutunatly out side of the closets...no there wouldnt have been a chance for that to even happen.




LadyPact -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 7:09:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

What you seem to be missing in this converstaion and in the artical is that this girl. only met her lawyer 5 minuets before her hearing. which should have led to her hearing being postponed because 5 minuets is not enough time to talk about anything or for her to even give the facts from her point of view to her lawyer. her lawyer should have also been sacked because this girl would have had a much better chance of getting parol with no parol officer from the judge if shed pleaded not guilty.

So your theory on this was that it would have been better to suck up the resources of, what I'm assuming was a public defender, and the court system when there really wasn't a doubt that the girl gave a blow job in class.  Something of which she was obviously guilty and, consensual blow job or not, was against the law.  If she'd have gone to trial, the DA would have called all witness confirming she did it. 
quote:

And if it actually went to court she could have given her side and they would have heard from the boy as well as no dubt by the time they got to that court date hed have been of legal consenting age and no longer a minor.

Yeah, it doesn't exactly work like that either.  The idea that the boy would grow up in the meantime waiting for the trial doesn't change that he was a minor when the incident occurred.  You must have missed a whole slew of cases that were brought against certain priests that were committed when the allegations were brought once people were adults.  Since the crimes occurred when the victims were children, they were charged that way.
quote:

Another thing is. That i myself at the age of 18 got arrested for totally different charges but if my mom my school and my lawyer had not been reminding me constantly when my appointments were or when id be off probation id have been in a whole shit ton more trouble. Age has nothing to do with maturity. espcially when it comes to things like going to court for the first time ever.

Is your argument here that people should just be patted on the head and not have to face the consequences of their sentences?  Great idea!  Nobody on probation should have to bother with those silly things.  Good grief. 
quote:

she was idiotic for even doing what she did in the first place. But the punishment she got was severly out of porportion to what she did. i would say expulsion from school with 100 hours community service should have been the absolut worse she got.
So, if she couldn't remember to meet with her probation officer, you really expect that she would have completed community service? 

quote:

also ignorance is no excuse but if shes like me at all i didnt even know my best friend was older than me until it was her birthday. forget knowing how old the kids were in school. so forget not knowing the law. how the hell was she supposed to know how old this kid was just by looking at him. hell even ive come to find after ive been released from a moment of passion and asked questions that someone was a slight bit younger than i was expecting them to be. i felt bad for it too but it happens when people dont ask ages first. And at that age its never something you ask first.
It wasn't a "moment of passion."  The boy got her to give him a blow job during class.  She was dumb enough to do it and made additional dumb decisions along the way.  Had she stuck to the terms of her sentence in the first place, she wouldn't be on the sexual offender registry.  She has no one to blame that for but herself.





Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 8:57:40 PM)

First even pubilc defenders are supposed to defend their clients. mine was a public defender and did his job. even pushed back a court date cause we hadnt been able to meet before the original date so yes it would have been better to suck up resources. Her lawyer did nothing for her. met her just 5 mins before trial and said your guilyt just say so. Hell even murderes with dozens of witnesses plead not guilty and still have a good chance of being let off if all the evidence doesnt add up to just one person. even if witness confirmed she did it she still would have been able to say. hey im an idiot this guy asked me to do this and it was dark and i thought itd be fun. the most she should have gotten was. And what I ment by hearing from the boy was that because he would no longer be a minor in the laws eyes she would have a right to have him questioned. meaning he would have to state his involvment to the court in this case and not just getting automatically protected by the hes a minor you cant question him card. Also i did not say people shouldt have to face their consequences i was poiting out the fact that no, most teenagers even if viewed as adults by the law are not responsible enough to keep up with doctors appointments much less cour dats and probation appointments along with all the rules they cram down your numbed mind while in court. It took my mom, my school counseler, my doctors and my lawyer to tell me what they said my rules were in court as well as makeing sure hey you have to go see such and such person next week like the judge ordered. so unless she failed to get to these appoinments with everyone and there mother telling her about them when they were coming up then i dont blame her at all for not remembering. espcially if she was still attending school and had tests and homework and other silly teen stuff she had to do. and the thing with community service is most schools require kids to do it to graduate. so yeah shed have remembered. thats something alot easier to say oh every day for 5 hours a day for the next 20 days i have to go 'work' at the (insert place here). cause then its a constant every day thing. much harder to forget. And again i mentioned the moment of passion thing in reference to myself as a point that it can be nearly impossible to know how old someone is unless they tatto their age to their foreheads. So if this kid was 2 weeks. meaning 14 days away from actually being 16 then there should have been some leeway. because if you go to the mall and look at a group of guys of varying hights and races ill bett you you will only get one age in maybe every 10 right on the nose so yes lets expect a 17 year old in the same class as him to know hes 14 days away from being legal and that it would be a really really stupid idea cause shed be labled as a child molestor for life. you keep arguing this like the law makes sense for children doing this to children. when it doesnt. espcially when they are both willing participants. and the 'minor' asked for it. when at 17 that girl herself is still a minor in the governments eyes and still getting claimed as such on her parents taxes. so this minor not minor distinction makes no sense in this case.
Your 40 or so you profile says. I get that you like your laws as they are. but as part of the younger generation i have no shame in addmitting alot of our laws are antquiated and just plain crazy if you apply them as the book says to every single person. so you can keep your death grip on the old laws being applied libberaly to everyone no matter what the circumstance. And i will uphold my belife that this is just one of many laws that needs to be looked at and carried out on a case by case basis on what makes sense and is truely fair when to kids both consenting are part of the equation




LadyPact -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 9:33:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

First even pubilc defenders are supposed to defend their clients. mine was a public defender and did his job. even pushed back a court date cause we hadnt been able to meet before the original date so yes it would have been better to suck up resources. Her lawyer did nothing for her. met her just 5 mins before trial and said your guilyt just say so. Hell even murderes with dozens of witnesses plead not guilty and still have a good chance of being let off if all the evidence doesnt add up to just one person. even if witness confirmed she did it she still would have been able to say. hey im an idiot this guy asked me to do this and it was dark and i thought itd be fun. the most she should have gotten was. And what I ment by hearing from the boy was that because he would no longer be a minor in the laws eyes she would have a right to have him questioned. meaning he would have to state his involvment to the court in this case and not just getting automatically protected by the hes a minor you cant question him card. Also i did not say people shouldt have to face their consequences i was poiting out the fact that no, most teenagers even if viewed as adults by the law are not responsible enough to keep up with doctors appointments much less cour dats and probation appointments along with all the rules they cram down your numbed mind while in court. It took my mom, my school counseler, my doctors and my lawyer to tell me what they said my rules were in court as well as makeing sure hey you have to go see such and such person next week like the judge ordered. so unless she failed to get to these appoinments with everyone and there mother telling her about them when they were coming up then i dont blame her at all for not remembering. espcially if she was still attending school and had tests and homework and other silly teen stuff she had to do. and the thing with community service is most schools require kids to do it to graduate. so yeah shed have remembered. thats something alot easier to say oh every day for 5 hours a day for the next 20 days i have to go 'work' at the (insert place here). cause then its a constant every day thing. much harder to forget. And again i mentioned the moment of passion thing in reference to myself as a point that it can be nearly impossible to know how old someone is unless they tatto their age to their foreheads. So if this kid was 2 weeks. meaning 14 days away from actually being 16 then there should have been some leeway. because if you go to the mall and look at a group of guys of varying hights and races ill bett you you will only get one age in maybe every 10 right on the nose so yes lets expect a 17 year old in the same class as him to know hes 14 days away from being legal and that it would be a really really stupid idea cause shed be labled as a child molestor for life. you keep arguing this like the law makes sense for children doing this to children. when it doesnt. espcially when they are both willing participants. and the 'minor' asked for it. when at 17 that girl herself is still a minor in the governments eyes and still getting claimed as such on her parents taxes. so this minor not minor distinction makes no sense in this case.
Your 40 or so you profile says. I get that you like your laws as they are. but as part of the younger generation i have no shame in addmitting alot of our laws are antquiated and just plain crazy if you apply them as the book says to every single person. so you can keep your death grip on the old laws being applied libberaly to everyone no matter what the circumstance. And i will uphold my belife that this is just one of many laws that needs to be looked at and carried out on a case by case basis on what makes sense and is truely fair when to kids both consenting are part of the equation


I'm not going to quote all of the separate sections this time.  It's entirely too difficult with the lack of paragraphs.  (The spelling could use some work, too.)

What you're abdicating here is that those who commit crimes should buck the system.  I'm sorry to say that is part of what is wrong with plea bargaining.  That is a whole other thread better suited for politics and religion.

It's very obvious to Me that you didn't bother doing any research behind the story that the article presented and, I suspect, didn't even read the whole thread.  The point of being young and "forgetful" about appointments has already been raised and answered.  Being given five years probation a 17 means she was an adult for 80% of that sentence.  Yes, I absolutely expect that anyone without some kind of mental incapacity to be able to handle their affairs in an adult fashion at 18.

As for the boy asking for it, please, read the article.  This woman is not the only case.  Did you happen to catch that part about the 27 year old who "thought" the girl he was screwing was 17 when she was really younger?  Sure, she was all for him banging her, but since she really was a minor, she didn't have what the law considers the ability to consent.

I'm not exactly going to the mall cruising for teenagers, so that point is moot. 

Yes, I absolutely am 40, and if My age has anything to do with the laws about it's not acceptable to give a student a blow job during class, I'm good with that.  From what you are writing here, with your experience in band closets and such, it's fine that you don't see it that way.  Silly Me, thinking schools should be a place of education and not just a free for all of oral sex if the teacher dims the lights.




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 10:10:58 PM)

I may not have done more research right after reading it as i had done researh in school my senior year so whats the point of redoing that research. Youll also notice i have only focused on the part where its the girl who was just a kid. and i am assumeing she got 5 years probation but was put in jail before that 5 years even came close because she had issues schedualing things. i have no doubt that the law is working perfectly fine for the 27 year old you got introuble over the 14 year ould thats just creepy and a very obvious and huge no. i am saying that for KIDS this law is not working. espcially when there is 3 year age difference that is more like 2. and both are consenting and the one getting in trouble is the one that was asked to do what she did not forceing it on the other person.

Now say if i at 22 did that to a girl who was 16 or 17 then yes i should be going to jail. if i didnt know there age beforehand because i didnt ask and they looked legal i would plead not guilty to get a trial and make sure that was known before i was sentenced. thats just me.

Now if say i was 35 and did it to a girl 16 or 17 knowing the age or not my butt deserves to be put into jail i might still try for a trial to get lesser time but i wouldnt be banking on that happening and i wouldnt be doing much to help my case. mostly because when i do something wrong i own up to it. i may own up to it after ive been able to get all the facts out but i own up to it. so the law in instances of adults 20 or overdoing anything with teens depend on how over they are might need a little of okay they do look legal they admitted they didnt tell you their age and you didnt ask so either we can take a little off your punishment or not but there would still be some form of punishment. for teens with teens unless its a 19 year old doing something to someone 15 or under and its obvious. if they are both consenting and the young of the 2 is initiating these things then id say let them be. warn tem for sure, and espcially come up with some for of punishment that makes sense if its done in public but dont brand them for life as rapists when it was an innocent albeit stupid gesture of lust.

and yes my spelling sucks it always has and always will. i am dyslexic and moved around to much growing up to get any consistant flow of teaching while it would have been benifical to help me. so sorry you had to decifer my words.




LadyPact -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/19/2009 10:38:56 PM)

That's the problem.  You didn't do the research.  You just looked at the article and took it at face value.  You didn't bother to notice that the woman went to jail because of subsequent actions.  Or that she filed suit in GA because she tried to duck the law again with her residence.  Or that she also has another conviction under her belt.  You did exactly what the writer of the article hoped you would do.  Feel sorry for her even though she broke the law.




thishereboi -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 4:00:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

well first im a lesbian and thats what the drama closet was for..or the band closet. and second i sat in the front row of classes of maybe 15 so woulda been hard to even get enough kids in a class for it to be plausible. that and i was the only out lesbian in school at the time. sooo unfroutunatly out side of the closets...no there wouldnt have been a chance for that to even happen.



That did not answer my question. I didn't ask if you ever had the opportunity. In your post you implied that the girl did not know what she was doing was wrong. So I will ask you again. When you were in school did you realize that it was wrong to have sex with another student in the class?




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:42:39 AM)

yes i did. but it didnt mean that if the oppertunity to do so happened to appear that i turned it down just for that fact. because i like most other kids had sex on the brain and no steady way of makeing it happen. so if a girl in my gym class said take a shower with me or a girl in my art class said to meet her in the drama closet next peroid i did. i knew full well it was wrong and was probably result in a suspension if not worse but i still did it. cause there was a thill in not knowing if wed be caught and all the kids knew what the closets were for and what the girls who were shareing showers did and no one ratted people out because either they wished it were them or they wished they had the guts. so yes. I did  and still do know its wrong. but given a chance to go back id do it again.because it was FUN. which is all i cared about in high school. my first question always was. is it fun. if yes then i did it if no then i asked a few more questions before deciding if i wanted to do it. right and wrong never crossed my mind. because if it did 3/4ths of the stuff i did in high school would have never happened. I dont know what kind of high schoolers you all now but all the ones ive ever known from when i was younger till now have all been intrested in fun and of the opion that if they thought they could get away with it they would try to get away with it. and im pretty sure that has nothing to do with where people go to school and everything to do with how boreing they preceive there life to be. that is the end of this and all other points i will try to get across because i know you older folks are of the if i didnt do this then nobody did varity and enjoy trying to make people sound like idots when they have valid points.

and Lp i did read the whole entier thread before i even started posting. so yes i know people argued some of the stuff i did if differently. which should just mean i support them and their side and not...well not yours..and your style of picking apart peoples paragraphs is mostly just so you can belittle them and what they are saying where as i tend to find one or two solid blocks of text if not easy to read is less offensive to look at and less likely to put someone on the defensive because they feel like theyve been insulted.

Bye grandma and grandpa. have a nice night.




RapierFugue -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 6:00:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kitastrophe33

Yes. For me. I am an adult, therefore it is for me. In the case cited in the article, a teenage girl, goes down on a teenage boy. To me that's something entirely different. When I was 15 I had sex with my 16 year old boyfriend...would have been pretty ridiculous if either one of us had ended up registered as a sex offender for that. That's an issue for parents to deal with... Not the law.

The law can get involved when an *adult* has sex with a minor. And I realize there's that gray area of the just turned 18 year old banging his almost 18 year old girlfriend...but the law was intended to protect 16 year olds from 30 year old preditors. Not from their high school sweet hearts.



That was one of the 3 parts that caught my eye too ...

1:
"Terry Norris of the Georgia Sheriffs’ Association cites a man who was convicted of statutory rape two decades ago for having consensual sex with his high-school sweetheart, to whom he is now married. “It doesn’t make it right, but it doesn’t make him a threat to anybody,” says Mr Norris. “We spend the same amount of time on that guy as on someone who’s done something heinous.”"

2:
"Several studies suggest that making it harder for sex offenders to find a home or a job makes them more likely to reoffend. Gwenda Willis and Randolph Grace of the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, for example, found that the lack of a place to live was “significantly related to sexual recidivism”. Candace Kruttschnitt and Christopher Uggen of the University of Minnesota and Kelly Shelton of the Minnesota Department of Corrections tracked 556 sex offenders on probation and found less recidivism among those with a history of stable employment."

3:
"Publicly accessible sex-offender registries are intended to keep people safe. But there is little evidence that they do. A study by Kristen Zgoba of the New Jersey Department of Corrections found that the state’s system for registering sex offenders and warning their neighbours cost millions of dollars and had no discernible effect on the number of sex crimes. Restricting where sex offenders can live is supposed to keep them away from potential victims, but it is doubtful that this works. A determined predator can always catch a bus."

While accepting that, in general, the law (wherever it is applied) tends to be an ass, in terms of not taking account of personal circumstances, but rather in slavishly following the letter of the law, rather than its spirit or intent, I can't help thinking that laws are there to serve the people and, where they aren't (see above), they aren't good laws.




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:20:13 PM)

Thank You. i would hug you but i dont know you. [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:24:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

Bye grandma and grandpa. have a nice night.

This whole entire thread aside, those of us who really are Grandmas and Grandpas aren't put off but those titles.  It is a joy in life that can not be used as an insult.




RapierFugue -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:25:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

Thank You. i would hug you but i dont know you. [:D]


Madam, I am generally happy to be hugged by any gender, race, creed, colour or religion.

Unless they try to pick my pockets. In that case, I get proper snotty.




Dragonfly369 -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:39:42 PM)

yes but i happen to have stranger issues. so i guess itll have to do as being said i would.

@ LP it wasnt an insult. unless i am comparing you to my grandparents. in which case you may take offense. -waves hand- ta




RapierFugue -> RE: Unjust and ineffective sex laws in USA (8/20/2009 5:41:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonfly369

Thank You. i would hug you but i dont know you. [:D]


Madam, I am generally happy to be hugged by any gender, race, creed, colour or religion.

Unless they try to pick my pockets. In that case, I get proper snotty.


For some bizarre reason (well mostly coz it's my fave hour of TV, ever), I found myself watching S01E01 of The West Wing this evening, and the following quote jumped out:

Religious Extremist: "If our children can buy pornography on any street corner for $5, isn't that too high a price to pay for free speech?"

President Bartlet: "No"

Fundamentalist Christian: "Really?"

President Bartlet: "On the other hand, I do think $5 is too high a price to pay for pornography".

I guess what I'm saying is, the degree of "tolerance" being paraded in this thread doesn't fill me with joy.





Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.296875E-02