Andalusite -> RE: If the tables were turned. (8/13/2009 9:24:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact Kind of makes you wonder if we females would ignore such things put in profiles and proceed to be annoying until we were blocked by the males. [8D] I seriously doubt it. The only women who write that way tend to be scammers, pro-Dommes who cater to the BDSM-porn female supremacists, and guys pretending to be women. They might have a lot more e-mails to choose from, and quite possibly a lot of "umm Hi" type ones that aren't very detailed, but not much in the way of "On your knees bitch/I want to serve you/I'm a worthless worm" types, or whatever equivalent ones would be likely to get them blocked. Some might not bother to respond to any woman who doesn't meet their standards, though, no matter how well she writes. Jaz, I'm taken, so I wouldn't be affected, but in general, I'd say a lot of the women would play with each other, and poly would probably become even more popular/accepted, so that would tend to even the numbers out a bit. I suspect that most of the loser guys, of whatever BDSM persuasion, still wouldn't attract much interest, but there would be a lot more competition for the good ones. In your question, do you mean that the shift would take place in the local public scenes as well, or just online? There's some overlap, but certainly not exclusively, and it's hard to imagine those demographics shifting significantly that quickly. Lilly, I don't think of it as choosing, even though I'm a switch. When I was looking, I was open to any BDSM role, with a man of any BDSM orientation, but I can't *choose* to submit to or dominate someone, it depended on how I reacted to that individual. AAkasha, I'm with you on that - I've "converted" a couple of open-minded vanilla guys, and have had LTRs with a couple more guys who were interested in BDSM, but hadn't had a chance to explore it yet. Even if I were single again, losing the BDSM kinky sites as a useful tool probably wouldn't affect me all that much.
|
|
|
|