CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
Heretic, Not to be argumentative, but I -do- have a question (on top of my earlier questions which weren't answered by anyone)... Just because we -can- do something, does that necessarily mean we -should- do it? I mean, just because we can rip up the planet and tear it open to get to more oil, does that mean that it is the absolute BEST way to meet our energy needs? See, it seems to me that we've been handed better options, nearly on a silver platter. Between wind, water, and solar energy, with some (much needed) innovation in technology (which, btw, it sounds like shale oil extraction is going to need as well before it is functional), and with a little bit of responsible management of our energy -consumption-, I don't think it would be unreasonable to say that we could meet our energy needs without ripping up yet another bit of our planet's infrastructure -- so why, pray tell, is this considered WRONG, rather than WISE? DC
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|