RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LadyNTrainer -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (8/23/2009 4:57:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andalusite
I guess I misunderstood. I don't get paid because "it's fair because I have to put up with them." I think that's a rather crappy attitude to have toward clients/customers, although you can't always choose who you will work with.


Consider the plight of the doctor at a social event who is endlessly approached by people asking for free medical advice, ruining her good time at the party. She is not willing to put up with that in her personal life, but patients who are willing to show up at the clinic where the proper diagnostic tools are and pay to support that clinic and the doctor's salary are welcome.  However if a patient with a really fascinating case relevant to her research interests shows up, or if that patient is a good personal friend, she might be quite willing to exercise her medical skills at a party or see them on her own time at the clinic.  Does that doctor have a "crappy attitude"?  If not, what exactly is the difference?


quote:

If they are really rude and obnoxious enough that you feel that way, I'd hope you could find other clients who didn't push your buttons like that.


I do, thank you.  But that does not mean I have the time or energy to cater to all of the men who are interested in training with me without being compensated.

quote:

If you like and respect your clients, then why is it a question of fairness?


I should hope that any professional, whether they are a doctor, an electrician, a plumber or a website designer, should generally like and respect their clients.  They should not however be expected to work without fair compensation.


quote:

You don't choose to work with them or play with them for free, fine, but no amount of money would make it "fair" for me to do anything sexually charged with someone I felt that way toward, and doing so *would* mess with my own sexuality and BDSM aspects in my personal life.


Ahh, I see.  It's different because sex is involved.  While I respect the different limits and boundaries of others, everyone has the right to decide where their own sexual comfort zones are.  I am personally comfortable doing "naughty" things with clients that do not cross the boundaries of prostitution (eg, no direct sexual contact).  I have friends who are professional escorts who are comfortable doing more than that.  I also have friends like yourself who are unwilling to engage in any form of BDSM or kink except with trusted personal partners, because they perceive the exchange as sexually charged and are not comfortable with such an interaction with relative strangers. 

I agree that no amount of money would make it "fair" for someone to violate their own personal comfort zones.  For me, playing in a kinky but not directly sexual way with relative strangers is completely comfortable, something I'm quite likely to do for casual amusement at a play party or with a client.  In truth, my rates are more competitive with vanilla personal trainers than pro dommes, so I consider that I am fairly charging for the physical fitness service that I am both qualified and legally certified to offer, and having a hell of a lot of fun with the kinky part. 




thishereboi -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (2/17/2010 11:20:17 AM)

quote:

Same for pro dommes, though I would often like to play with many of them cause they are usually oh so hot, it comes down to this fact: Asking for money is the bdsm equivalent of being a prostitute in the vanilla world.


Do you go to restaurants? Do you think the cook should make your meal for free? How about pro sports? Do you think the athletes should be out there entertaining you out of the goodness of their hearts? What about barber shops? Do you get all pissed off, when the guy asks your to pay for the service you just received? Sorry, but my guess is, you have no clue what a pro domme is?

I will agree with the hot part. At least the ones I know personally. And yes they are fucking awesome to play with. Some of my favorite scenes have been with women who also happened to be pros.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (2/17/2010 11:37:43 AM)

lilboycaught,

Tribute would not even exist, If there were not for the desparate guys out there coughing up the $$$. It's really a shame to see how 'male submission' had advanced from the 10,000 foot perspective, This could be looked upon as an utter failure as well.

I'm expressing this, using the same level of thought you asserted in your OP. It helps to flip the coin over and look at it the same light. Tends to lead to more objective conclusions by deduction instead of one sided conclusions based on clouded conjecture.

Bell well














Lashra -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (2/18/2010 4:09:55 AM)

My Femdom relationship is alive and well and has been for the last 7 years. So while it may fail for some people, it is working quite well for others. Lots of relationships fail regardless of what dynamic they have, that is just how life is.

Instead of focusing on the pros that charge for their services, perhaps you should do some real research and find a lifestyle Femdom. So many male subs end up going to pros because it is just easier for them to pay someone, rather than putting the time and effort into meeting someone and establishing a relationship.

Good luck,
~Lashra




SweetDommes -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (2/18/2010 4:20:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lilboycaught


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilboycaught

quote:

Actually, the male dominants don't ask for money because they wouldn't get it.....period. Female dominant profiles asking for money exist because men will pay.


Oh, you're certainly right there. But don't you see? Male dominants exist even though there is no money involved.

See? Which begs the question, would female dominants even exist without money?


You've already answered that question in your initial post! Quit your damned whining already.



For God's sake I'm NOT whining. You're wining. I asked a question. Is the female domination lifestyle a failure. Haven't had a single answer yet.



Actually, there are answers to it from multiple people - it isn't a failure. You just chose not to pay attention to them because you aren't liking them.

Female dominants do exist without money entering the picture. Holly and I only require money from a boy if/when he is contributing to the bills of our household. Until then, he only has to pay for what he feels willing and able to. There are many others who are the same way. Perhaps if you are only finding the same types of women, the problem isn't with them ...




xxblushesxx -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (2/18/2010 5:52:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

Same for pro dommes, though I would often like to play with many of them cause they are usually oh so hot, it comes down to this fact: Asking for money is the bdsm equivalent of being a prostitute in the vanilla world.


Do you go to restaurants? Do you think the cook should make your meal for free? How about pro sports? Do you think the athletes should be out there entertaining you out of the goodness of their hearts? What about barber shops? Do you get all pissed off, when the guy asks your to pay for the service you just received? Sorry, but my guess is, you have no clue what a pro domme is?

I will agree with the hot part. At least the ones I know personally. And yes they are fucking awesome to play with. Some of my favorite scenes have been with women who also happened to be pros.



Six months?

It took you six months to come up with a reply?!!

[;)][:D]




BelleNoir -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/5/2010 9:32:51 AM)

I can only think of one reason.
1. In my experience I do not feel there are many forums for ProDommes or those strictly seeking Prodommes.

I do not know what area of the country you live in or why you think that Domination is about sexual gratification. I know that just because I play with someone does not mean I am going to have sex with them. There is a pschology behind what we do and how we do it.
And you sit there and pass judgement on people you don't know. Is this your only why to find someone?
Do you live the lifestyle? Do you show face in public and attend munches, classes, parties, anything or do you hid behind the computer and expect it to come to you? You sound ignorant.

I am a Pro Domme and PROUD of it . I have been Dominant my whole life. I can remember even as a child I despised the image of a submissive woman because it seemed a role forced on them by society. I also despise painting anyone with a broad brush because it is stereotyping.
I play for free when I feel like it usually at parties.
It seems to me you have been in this lifestyle long enough to know what you are saying is silly.

Dominant Women exist without money.

Submissive men exist without thinking the are entitled to a Dommes attention simply because they are willing to submit.

I am no less a REAL Domme because I charge to do it. I am Dominant in all aspects of my life not just when I have a whip in my hand.

You need to learn more about this lifestyle and if you are not finding sucess in it you should try a few more venues.





BelleNoir -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/5/2010 9:35:11 AM)

Did I mention I know how to spell psychology and success? lol




submaleinzona -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/5/2010 1:29:41 PM)

My this is a long thread.

I've noticed that this topic seems to come up a lot.

One thing that gets brought up a lot is the ratio of submissive men to dominant women, and a few brought up that that's also how it is in the vanilla world, with several guys around one woman. Now, that being the case, I have to wonder: Where are all the other women at? If there are 10 single males going after one single female, then it would seem to me that there should be at least 9 single females...somewhere.

I've heard that in church groups, single women tend to outnumber the single men. I'm not sure if that's really true or not, as I haven't taken the time to research it, but it would explain a few things.




Elisabella -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 5:55:48 AM)

Jesus. Reading this thread there is only one thought in my mind - why is it that any time a submissive man posts anything other than "how may I serve you Mistress" there is an explosion of women acting like downright cunts?

It's not even (just) the dommes, the first response to this thread was one of several snarky posts by a femsub who literally contributed nothing to the thread but multiple one or two line snark posts. And then comes the avalanche of tirades from dommes who seem to think that a guy expecting his needs to be met in a relationship as well is unthinkable and gloating that only the cream of the crop of male submissives get chosen.

Well actually, that last bit is true. The top male submissives get chosen, and the sheer gender imbalance of the femdom lifestyle means that not only is it incredibly difficult for the above-average-but-not-perfect men to find a woman (the kind of men who would have no trouble finding a vanilla wife, if they were so inclined, but since they're in the top 20% rather than the top 10% the 1/10 ratio screws them over) but also, it means that the less than desirable femdoms who would be lonely cat ladies if vanilla, have far less trouble finding a partner.

Which makes me wonder how the women here who seem to delight in saying "well obviously you're not good enough to attract a domme" would feel if the tables were turned and they were competing against 10 women for a man, knowing that no matter how attractive, successful or loving you are, there's always going to be a couple women who are that and more.

That's where the financial aspect comes in - lots of cute young girls realize there's a niche market in the sex industry and are able to fill it, and guys who aren't able to get their sexual needs met elsewhere have a place to go. I'm utterly astounded at some of the replies here that seem to completely dismiss the sexual needs of a submissive male. I've also seen that femdom is a lot different than maledom in that for a lifestyle LTR, in a femdom relationship there is almost always a strong service aspect. I have had comparably little trouble finding men who wanted a long term relationship with me where I would submit in the bedroom for mutual pleasure without any nonsexual service to him and we were both happy and fulfilled, but from what I've read on this thread a femdom relationship is a lot more service oriented. I don't think one is inherently better or worse than the other but it does show that the genders tend to prioritize things differently.

Anyway back to the OP - I think he makes quite a few valid points, I'd also think that there needs to be a discussion about the distinction between a male submissive and a male bottom because although I absolutely fundamentally loathe the term bottom (it's what I call my butt. I'm not too keen to refer to a person with the same word I use for my butt.) because it seems that when female dominants use the term "male submissive" they think of a person with a strong service orientation whereas when a lot of male submissives use the phrase, they're thinking in terms of sexual submission and sexual kinks. Personally I like the term 'sexual submissive' and 'service oriented submissive' to distinguish, but I do think it kind of sucks that the numbers mean that if there are 10 dommes who want service oriented submissives and only 5 of 100 male subs who want service oriented submission, the other 95 are going to have to either learn to like service oriented submission or go to a pro because the numbers mean the women don't have to compromise when seeking a partner.

And as someone who loves bedroom fun but would be absolutely miserable in the "service oriented" relationships that some people enjoy, I'll just say I'm glad the numbers worked out *for me* that I didn't have to force myself into a role I wouldn't be happy in just to find a romantic partner. Have some sympathy here people, all the snarking just because you found a partner and the OP hasn't really looks petty.




Lucienne -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 7:14:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
Which makes me wonder how the women here who seem to delight in saying "well obviously you're not good enough to attract a domme" would feel if the tables were turned and they were competing against 10 women for a man, knowing that no matter how attractive, successful or loving you are, there's always going to be a couple women who are that and more.


I get your point about the numbers in the bdsm context, but come on.... this place isn't exactly full of dommes who are 24 year old supermodels. It's an exceptionally rare woman who doesn't know what it is to feel like you're competing with younger/skinnier/prettier/breastier women for male attention. It's pretty myopic of you to lose sight of that. There is a place where the tables are turned - it's called the rest of the damn world. It's almost like you're asking dommes to feel guilty because they're taking proper advantage of a buyer's market. In terms of understanding one's place in the world, I can see the point of recognizing, as a domme, that you're leveraging your particular interest/skill set for a "better" man than you might get on the "vanilla" market. But seeing as the supply/demand numbers are unlikely to change, well, ever, I don't think there's any reason for dommes to change their behavior. Also, I have a difficult time summoning much sympathy for men who've found that little corner of the world where it's not all about them and their sexual needs.






Elisabella -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 3:31:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
Which makes me wonder how the women here who seem to delight in saying "well obviously you're not good enough to attract a domme" would feel if the tables were turned and they were competing against 10 women for a man, knowing that no matter how attractive, successful or loving you are, there's always going to be a couple women who are that and more.


I get your point about the numbers in the bdsm context, but come on.... this place isn't exactly full of dommes who are 24 year old supermodels. It's an exceptionally rare woman who doesn't know what it is to feel like you're competing with younger/skinnier/prettier/breastier women for male attention. It's pretty myopic of you to lose sight of that. There is a place where the tables are turned - it's called the rest of the damn world. It's almost like you're asking dommes to feel guilty because they're taking proper advantage of a buyer's market. In terms of understanding one's place in the world, I can see the point of recognizing, as a domme, that you're leveraging your particular interest/skill set for a "better" man than you might get on the "vanilla" market. But seeing as the supply/demand numbers are unlikely to change, well, ever, I don't think there's any reason for dommes to change their behavior. Also, I have a difficult time summoning much sympathy for men who've found that little corner of the world where it's not all about them and their sexual needs.



No, no, I'm not saying they should feel guilty about it, just chill out on the "obviously you're not good enough to have a partner if you're single" thing when the numbers are so skewed. From what I see, the OP was saying more or less "wow it sucks that most of the dommes on this site are pros, and it's incredibly hard for a submissive man to find a dominant woman" and the response was "quit whining that no dommes like you, it's obviously your fault" when the majority of dommes who replied are happily partnered and (seemingly) oblivious to the fact that the OP could be a nice guy. I didn't get whining out of his post at all, I think it was well written and he responded to the negative replies very well, and I think it's a shame that the first few replies were just snark because that set the tone of the conversation.

I also don't get why a man who expects to have his sexual needs met in a relationship, and makes it a requirement for finding a partner, is seen as a selfish do me sub...obviously if he makes it *only* about his needs then yeah, he's a selfish partner, but not just for expecting that his ideal partner will share many of his sexual desires. We all have sexual needs and I don't really see the point of being in a relationship with someone if you're that sexually unfulfilled.

I held out for a man who would do me the way I like to be done. Nobody says I'm selfish, or that I'm not a real submissive because I haven't overriden my sex drive to become a servant who always puts my partner's sexual needs first. I don't get the vitriol toward another submissive who feels the same way I do, just because he's male.




cloudboy -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:00:49 PM)

I was reading Men's Journal magazine and they always has a "sex" section.

S&M was listed as the one thing men and women (combined) were least interested in. (About 5,000 people were polled.)

Men were least interested in a threesome with another man.

Women were least interested in a threesome with another woman. (They weren't too hot on Anal Sex either.)

The most popular shared interests were having sex in a public place followed by the use of sex toys. (To repeat, the least popular shared interest was S&M.)




Smutmonger -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:09:58 PM)

There ain't no such thing a a free lunch. We all pay for what we get in some sort of coin.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:41:45 PM)

quote:

Reading this thread there is only one thought in my mind - why is it that any time a submissive man posts anything other than "how may I serve you Mistress" there is an explosion of women acting like downright cunts?


The reality, Elisabella, is that most of us have become quite adept as distinguishing a fetishist looking for a dominatrix to cater to his desires from a truly submissive man. Most truly dominant women aren't too fond of men wanting to use them to get off.

That said, unless the OP is completely offensive, I try to give the best advice to him that I can. I also often try to give them the benefit of the doubt that they are being sincere.

- LA




Smutmonger -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:46:28 PM)

I think you have it there-the amount of objectification that is projected. Personally..If I were to be approached by a fem sub who's attitude was "Anyone who will serve need "x" will do..."

They just would not do. It's not just the men who pull this shit.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

Reading this thread there is only one thought in my mind - why is it that any time a submissive man posts anything other than "how may I serve you Mistress" there is an explosion of women acting like downright cunts?


The reality, Elisabella, is that most of us have become quite adept as distinguishing a fetishist looking for a dominatrix to cater to his desires from a truly submissive man. Most truly dominant women aren't too fond of men wanting to use them to get off.

That said, unless the OP is completely offensive, I try to give the best advice to him that I can. I also often try to give them the benefit of the doubt that they are being sincere.

- LA






LadyAngelika -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:55:21 PM)

quote:

I think you have it there-the amount of objectification that is projected.


Indeed. As Aakasha once so perfectly put it --

So the submissive says to the Femdom he's courting, "Well, enough talking about my fetishes. What do YOU think about my fetishes?"

- LA




Smutmonger -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 9:57:56 PM)

My reply to more than one of this sort in the past was.."You seem to have it all planned out perfectly.
I'm obviously not even needed-you can go fuck yourself."

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

I think you have it there-the amount of objectification that is projected.


Indeed. As Aakasha once so perfectly put it --

So the submissive says to the Femdom he's courting, "Well, enough talking about my fetishes. What do YOU think about my fetishes?"

- LA






LadyNTrainer -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/6/2010 11:10:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Jesus. Reading this thread there is only one thought in my mind - why is it that any time a submissive man posts anything other than "how may I serve you Mistress" there is an explosion of women acting like downright cunts?


Possibly because of the plethora of men acting like dicks.  An intelligent, interesting post from a submissive man that speaks to us as if we were actually fellow human beings is always welcomed and appreciated, and he is certain to get the same courtesy from us in turn.  Unfortunately that's more the exception than the rule.  It's not much fun to be fetishized, objectified, crudely propositioned, etc, but sadly that's a large percentage of what we get from "submissive" men who are actually aggressive sex fetishists with poor social skills.  And when somebody comes on board with a negative or bitter or selfish/demanding attitude right off the bat, it's no surprise when he reaps what he sows.


quote:

Which makes me wonder how the women here who seem to delight in saying "well obviously you're not good enough to attract a domme" would feel if the tables were turned and they were competing against 10 women for a man, knowing that no matter how attractive, successful or loving you are, there's always going to be a couple women who are that and more.


I don't delight in it.  It's a sad thing to have to explain to someone who has no clue why dominant women aren't interested in him that he has poor social skills and needs to do a better job of personal grooming and presentation if he wants to be considered desirable.  As for the supposed 10 to 1 statistics, what you see online may be misleading  The femdom events I have attended have very often had more women than men in attendance.  Build a strong community of other dominant women and they will come in numbers.  However, the constant barrage that female dominants get from aggressive sex fetishists on standard "adult" sites is such that many of us get thoroughly sick of it and disappear.  The odds of femdoms showing up and sticking around are much, much better in local groups when they are safe, supportive and either fully pansexual or femdom in orientation.  Funnily enough, we don't tend to hang out in very great numbers in places where we are constantly treated like things for fetishists to use.  Sadly, that would describe the atmosphere of most adult sites including this one.


quote:

I'm utterly astounded at some of the replies here that seem to completely dismiss the sexual needs of a submissive male. I've also seen that femdom is a lot different than maledom in that for a lifestyle LTR, in a femdom relationship there is almost always a strong service aspect. I have had comparably little trouble finding men who wanted a long term relationship with me where I would submit in the bedroom for mutual pleasure without any nonsexual service to him and we were both happy and fulfilled, but from what I've read on this thread a femdom relationship is a lot more service oriented. I don't think one is inherently better or worse than the other but it does show that the genders tend to prioritize things differently.


Depends on the individuals, really.  There are plenty of top/bottom couples I know who don't do much D/s or service in their relationship.  There is nothing wrong with a male bottom who is not submissive, as long as he is honest and up front about his interest and at least as equally interested in making his partner happy as in getting his own rocks off.  The problem is that the huge number of rude, selfish, demanding do-me boys who expect women to act as their personal drive-through McDomme's are the ones who are the most public representatives of that orientation.  Ergo dominant women do often use service and submission as an asshole filter to avoid the worst of that lot.  It does make a good asshole filter in that the selfish ones won't be willing to do anything for us at all, and the good bottoms who aren't really submissive or into service have good enough social skills to get to know us as people first.

quote:

Have some sympathy here people, all the snarking just because you found a partner and the OP hasn't really looks petty.


There's a good reason the OP hasn't found a partner, and I don't think it does him any favors not to point that out. 

Ethical male submissives who have good social skills and take decent physical care of themselves, even if they are pure bottoms who are only into kink for fun, do not tend to lack for female dominant partners.  The only exception would be if they live in Lower East Buttfuck, Alaska and can't make it to any realtime BDSM events.  If you're well groomed, take care of yourself physically, have good enough manners that you are genuinely fun to be with, and most importantly you have a real interest in making your partner happy, you will find someone without having to compromise on what you want. 

If you aren't doing any of this stuff, you're fucked.  It's not about the "odds", and it's not about all dommes being fake because they don't want you.  It's about taking responsibility for yourself and your choices.  And if you blame other people for your lack of desirability, rather than focusing your energy on improving yourself and becoming more desirable, you're not just fucked.  You're fucked up. Harsh but true.




JoeStalin -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (3/10/2010 12:42:17 AM)

yadda yadda yadda

and conclusion of this long boring dribble is that pro dommes sexually satisfy men in exchange for their money, which just happens to be exactly same definition as for the oldest profession known to mankind, the so called whoring.

and 14 pages of rationalisation, "no it's not, no it's not, i'm not, i'm not"

LOL






Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875