LadyNTrainer -> RE: Is the Female Domination Lifestyle a Failure? (8/20/2009 7:32:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy quote:
In your apparently rather rigid judgment Where exactly do you come up with this stuff? As for Aakasha, its just more of the usual, aka her challenger is: "paranoid," "bitter," "obsessed," and "angry." Its pretty amusing and Bill O'Reillyesque. Because it really and truly looks that way to an observer, even one who is surprised to see it in you. I don't think you're that kind of person, having chatted with you amiably from my former friends-only profile. But your ragging on Akasha just plain looks bad, and I really have to wonder what's motivating you. quote:
As for suspicions, I suppose my greatest was when she was looking for a secondary partner for what seemed like 18 MOs - 2 yrs, and it came to look like simply a lure for attention to sign up for professional sessions. Sorry, anyone with half a brain had to get suspicious there. [Those reading the Ask a Mistress Board] Let me give you a short look inside a domme's headspace. Finding a secondary partner is *hard*. I've been at it myself for quite some time, but I mostly stick to trolling local BDSM mailing lists and poly events, because unlike Akasha, I'm really not set up to deal with long distance situations, or bringing someone in who might not have a job in this area initially. I do get a lot of people approaching me on this profile asking for a personal relationship, but they're *not* the best candidates for clients. It's not a good "marketing shunt" at all, and it's not why I'm looking for a secondary partner. I'm looking to add a third into my current household because my primary sub/partner is bisexual, I really enjoy the dynamics of a trio in so many ways, and the "leather family" model has historically been a very good thing for me and my nontraditionally genderbent partners. The person we're looking for is a pretty rare bird, and we're both aware that the search is realistically quite likely to take some time to find the right fit. It will surprise no one if it does take us a couple of years to find a candidate. Poly can be like that; it gets exponentially harder to manage the wants and needs and emotional health of more people in a relationship. Unless you want dysfunctional poly, which is No Fun. The last thing the average pro domme wants is to have guys confused about what the expectations are in a session. I'm not talking about your "stealth pros" who pretend they are personally interested, then demand "tribute". I'm talking about the ethical, smart and serious ones who know why it's a good business model to keep a separation. For starters, the last thing I need is to be up on prostitution charges because I blurred the lines between the professional, nonsexual "kinky fitness" services I offer, and a personal session that will involve hot men getting nasty for my amusement. Like church and state, this shit seriously has to stay separate. There can't be any personal boundary crossing, and I don't even want clients trying for it. Managing that is just too difficult and dangerous. Yes, I'm tempted when cute bisexual clients show up. No, I'm not going there, unless I'm willing to fire them as clients first. I'm not sure what Akasha's parameters are for a secondary, but if she's at all interested in using him sexually, it is very much not worth the massive hassles and potential legal issues of blurring the boundaries between client and personal partner. I don't know why you're "suspicious" of Akasha. The truth is that she's a very amateur pro domme, in the sense that she's barely dabbling in the business end and not making nearly as much of a go at marketing and getting clients as she definitely could. She's a smart woman and very good at business, but she's applying those smarts to her vanilla career and not at all to her domme life. Think about it - what could she be doing to get lots more attention if she really was out to do more than amuse herself with very occasional phone sessions? It would be considerably less subtle and far more effective than advertising for a secondary.
|
|
|
|